Модифицированная Кэм-клэй модель. Основы теории и численный анализ

Автор: Гольдштейн Роберт Вениаминович, Кузнецов Сергей Владимирович

Журнал: Вычислительная механика сплошных сред @journal-icmm

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.9, 2016 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Анализируются основные уравнения и допущения, принимаемые при конструировании модифицированной Кэм-клэй модели. Отмечается связь модифицированной Кэм-клэй модели с родственными моделями теории пластичности с изотропным упрочнением, описываемыми замкнутыми поверхностями пластичности. Дается оценка уравнений состояния модификаций Кэм-клэй моделей в упругой зоне; выделены работы, в которых упругое состояние представляется уравнениями гиперупругости с экспоненциальным потенциалом. Рассматриваются обобщения модифицированных Кэм-клэй моделей на случай больших деформаций. Подчеркивается, что впервые Кэм-клэй модель с логарифмической поверхностью пластичности в докритической зоне построена в работах Роску, Скофилда и Роса. Позже предложено логарифмическую поверхность пластичности заменить эллипсоидальной. Такая модель также именуется модифицированной Кэм-клэй моделью. Как Кэм-клэй модель с логарифмической поверхностью, так и ее модификация с эллипсоидальной поверхностью относятся к упругопластическим моделям с изотропным упрочнением. Выявлены аналоги модификации Кэм-клэй моделей, в которых учитывается возможность моделирования эффекта Баушингера за счет сдвига поверхности пластичности с помощью комбинации изотропного и кинематического упрочнений. Приводится значительное число работ по применению как Кэм-клэй модели, так и ее модификаций для исследования поведения различных гранулированных материалов с малой когезией в условиях монотонных и циклических воздействий. Большая часть этих работ посвящена либо одноосному, либо трехосному силовому нагружению. Исходя из обзора публикаций делается вывод, что исследования по кинематическим комбинированным нагружениям в шаровой и девиаторной областях на основе Кэм-клэй модели практически отсутствуют. Именно этой проблеме посвящена настоящая работа.

Еще

Кэм-клэй модель, пластичность, гиперупругость, упрочнение, размягчение, когезия, сam-clay model

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14320802

IDR: 14320802   |   УДК: 53.072.23:534.5   |   DOI: 10.7242/1999-6691/2016.9.2.14

Modified Сam-clay model. Theoretical foundations and numerical analysis

State equations and principle assumptions of a modified cam-clay model are analyzed. It is assumed that the modified cam-clay model is related to the plasticity models described by the isotropic hardening rules and closed yield surfaces. Equations of state in the elastic zone, along with models related to the hyperelastic equations of state with the exponential potential, are considered. Some generalizations of the modified cam-clay model for finite strains are performed. Works associated with the problems regarding calibration of theoretical modified cam-clay models with experimental data are reviewed. The first Clay-clay model with logarithmic surface plasticity in the critical zone was constructed in [1, 2]. Later on, the logarithmic surface plasticity was replaced by ellipsoidal one. This model is also called a modified Cam-clay model. The Cam-clay model and its modified variant belong to a class of the elastic-plastic models with isotropic hardening. It should be noted that there are also some modifications of the Cam-clay models, which take into account the possibility of modeling the Bauschinger effect by shifting surface plasticity using a combination of isotropic and kinematic hardening rules. There are a considerable number of works, in which the Cam-clay model and its modifications are used to study the behavior of various granular materials with low cohesion under monotonic or cyclic force loadings. Most of these works are devoted to uniaxial or triaxial force loading. This paper deals with analyzing the behavior of the modified Cam-Clay model under combined kinematic loadings.

Еще

Список литературы Модифицированная Кэм-клэй модель. Основы теории и численный анализ

  • Roscoe K.H., Schofield A.N., Wroth C.P. On the yielding of soils//Géotechnique. -1958. -Vol. 8, no. 1. -P. 22-53.
  • Roscoe K.H., Schofield A.N. Mechanical behavior of an idealized ‘wet’ clay//Proc. 2nd European Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Wiesbaden, 1963. -Vol. I. -P. 47-54.
  • Roscoe K.H., Burland J.B. On the generalized stressstrain behavior of wet clay//Engineering Plasticity/Eds. J. Heyman, F.A. Leckie. -Cambridge University Press, 1968. -P. 535-609.
  • Alawaji H., Runesson K., Sture S., Axelsson K. Implicit integration in soil plasticity under mixed control for drained and undrained response//Int. J. Numer. Anal. Met. -1992. -Vol. 16, no. 10. -P. 737-756.
  • Armero F., Pérez-Foguet A. On the formulation of closest-point projection algorithms in elastoplasticity -part I: The variational structure//Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. -2002. -Vol. 53, no. 2. -P. 297-329.
  • Bigoni D., Hueckel T. Uniqueness and localization -I. Associative and non-associative elastoplasticity//Int. J. Solids Struct. -1991. -Vol. 28, no. 2. -P. 197-213.
  • Borja R.I., Lee S.R. Cam-Clay plasticity. Part I: Implicit integration of elasto-plastic constitutive relations//Comput. Method. Appl. M. -1990. -Vol. 78, no. 1. -P. 49-72.
  • Borja R.I., Sama K.M., Sanz P.F. On the numerical integration of three-invariant elastoplastic constitutive models//Comput. Method. Appl. M. -2003. -Vol. 192, no. 9-10. -P. 1227-1258.
  • Borja R., Tamagnini C. Cam-Clay plasticity, Part III: Extension of the infinitesimal model to include finite strains//Comput. Method. Appl. M. -1998. -Vol. 155, no. 1-2. -P. 73-95.
  • Buscarnera G., Dattola G., di Prisco C. Controllability, uniqueness and existence of the incremental response: A mathematical criterion for elastoplastic constitutive laws//Int. J. Solids Struct. -2011. -Vol. 48, no. 13. -P. 1867-1878.
  • Conti R., Tamagnini C., DeSimone A. Critical softening in Cam-Clay plasticity: Adaptive viscous regularization, dilated time and numerical integration across stress-strain jump discontinuities//Comput. Method. Appl. M. -2013. -Vol. 258. -P. 118-133.
  • Dal Maso G., DeSimone A. Quasistatic evolution for Cam-Clay plasticity: Examples of spatially homogeneous solutions//Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. -2009. -Vol. 19. -P. 1643-1711.
  • Dal Maso G., DeSimone A., Solombrino F. Quasistatic evolution for Cam-Clay plasticity: a weak formulation via viscoplastic regularization and time rescaling//Calc. Var. Partial. Dif. -2011. -Vol. 40, no. 1. -P. 125-181.
  • Dal Maso G., Solombrino F. Quasistatic evolution for Cam-Clay plasticity: The spatially homogeneous case//Networks and Heterogeneous Media. -2010. -Vol. 5, no. 1. -P. 97-132.
  • Al-Tabbaa A., Wood D.M. An experimentally based bubble model for clay//Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Num. Models Geomech. (NUMOG III), 8-11 May, 1989, Niagara Falls, Canada. -1989. -P. 90-99.
  • Andersen K.H. Bearing capacity under cyclic loading -offshore, along the coast, and on land//Can. Geotech J. -2009. -Vol. 46, no. 5. -P. 513-535.
  • Carter J.P., Booker J.R., Wroth C.P. A critical state soil model for cyclic loading//Soil mechanics -transient and cyclic loads/Eds. G.N. Pande, O.L. Zienkiewicz. -London: Wiley, 1982. -P. 219-252.
  • Liu J., Xia J. Experimental study on the stability of railroad silt subgrade with increasing train speed//J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. -2010. -Vol. 10.1061. -P. 833-841.
  • Mróz Z. On the description of anisotropic workhardening//J. Mech. Phys. Solids. -1967. -Vol. 15, no. 3. -P. 163-175.
  • Puppala A.J., Mohammad L., Allen A. Permanent deformation characterization of subgrade soils from RLT test//J. Mater. Civ. Eng. -1999. -Vol. 11, no. 4. -P. 274-282.
  • Sangrey D.A., Castro G., Poulos S.J., France J.W. Cyclic loading of sands, silts and clays//Earthquake engineering and soil dynamics. Proc. ASCE Geotechnical Engineering Division Specialty Conference, June 19-21, 1978, Pasadena, California. -P. 836-851.
  • Selig E.T., Chang C.S. Soil failure modes in undrained cyclic loading//J. Geotech. Eng.-ASCE. -1981. -Vol. 107, no. GT5. -P. 539-551.
  • Takahashi M., Hight D.W., Vaughan P.R. Effective stress changes observed during undrained cyclic triaxial tests on clay//Proc. Int. Symp. on Soils under Cyclic and Transient Loading/Eds. G.N. Pande, O.C. Zienkiewicz. -Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1980. -P. 201-209.
  • Uzan J. Characterization of granular material//Transportation Research Record. -1985. -Vol. 1022. -P. 52-59.
  • Wood D.M. Soil behaviour and critical state soil mechanics. -Cambridge University Press, 1990. -462 p.
  • Zhou J., Gong X. Strain degradation of saturated clay under cyclic loading//Can. Geotech. J. -2001. -Vol. 38, no. 1. -P. 208-212.
  • Ni J., Indraratna B., Geng X., Carter J., Chen Y. Model of soft soils under cyclic loading//Int. J. Geomech. -2014. -Vol. 15, no. 4. -P. 1-10.
  • Shahin M.A., Loh R.B.H., Nikraz H.R. Some observations on the behaviour of soft clay under undrained cyclic loading//J. GeoEngineering. -2011. -Vol. 6, no. 2. -P. 109-112.
  • Papuga J. A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading//Int. J. Fatigue. -2011. -Vol. 33, no. 2. -P. 153-165.
  • Hashiguchi K. On the linear relations of V -ln p and ln v -ln p for isotropic consolidation of soils//Int. J. Numer. Anal. Met. -1995. -Vol. 19, no. 5. -P. 367-376.
  • Schofield A.N., Wroth C.P. Critical state soil mechanics. -London: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
  • Van Eekelen S.J.M., van den Berg P. The delft egg model, a constitutive model for clay//DIANA Computational Mechanics’94. -1994. -P. 103-116.
  • Dafalias Y.F., Herrmann L.R. A bounding surface soil plasticity model//Proc. Int. Symp. Soils Cyclic Trans. Load. -University of Swansea, U.K., January, 1980. -P. 335-345.
  • Auricchio F., Taylor R.L. A return-map algorithm for general associative isotropic elasto-plastic materials in large deformation regimes//Int. J. Plasticity. -1999. -Vol. 15, no. 12. -P. 1359-1378.
  • Auricchio F., Taylor R.L., Lubliner J. Application of a return map algorithm to plasticity models//Computational Plasticity/Eds. D.R.J. Owen et al. -CIMNE, Barcelona, 1992. -P. 2229-2248.
  • Callari C., Auricchio F., Sacco E. A finite-strain cam-clay model in the framework of multiplicative elasto-plasticity//Int. J. Plasticity. -1998. -Vol. 14, no. 12. -P. 1155-1187.
  • Simo J.C., Meschke G. A new class of algorithms for classical plasticity extended to finite strains. Application to geomaterials//Comput. Mech. -1993. -Vol. 11, no. 4. -P. 253-278.
  • Drucker D.C, Gibson R.E., Henkel D.J. Soil mechanics and work hardening theories of plasticity//Trans. ASCE. -1957. -Vol. 122. -P. 338-346.
  • Brace W.F., Paulding B.W., Scholz C.H. Dilatancy in the fracture of crystalline rocks//J. Geophys. Res. -1966. -Vol. 71, no. 16. -P. 3939-3953.
  • DiMaggio F.L., Sandier I.S. Material model for granular soils//J. Eng. Mech. Div-ASCE. -1971. -Vol. 97. -P. 935-950.
  • Simo J.C., Hughes T.J.R. Computational inelasticity. -New York: Prentice-Hall, 1998.
  • Fossum A.F., Fredrich J.T. Estimation of constitutive parameters for the Belridge Diatomite, South Belridge Diatomite field//SAND98-1407, Sandia National Laboratories. -Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1998. -32 p.
  • Jefferies M.G., Shuttle D.A. Norsand: calibration and use. Prediction, analysis and design in geomechanical applications//Proc. of 11th Int. Conf. of IACMAG, Torino, Italy, June 19-24, 2005. -Vol. 1. -P. 345-352.
  • Kuznetsov S.V. Lamb waves in anisotropic plates (review)//Acoust. Phys. -2014. -Vol. 60, no. 1. -P. 95-103.
  • Corapcioglu Y., Uz T. Constitutive equations for plastic deformation of porous materials//Powder Technol. -1978. -Vol. 21, no. 2. -P. 269-274.
  • Jenike A.W., Sield R.T. On the plastic flow of Coulomb solids beyond original failure//J. Appl. Mech. -1959. -Vol. 26, no. 4. -P. 599-602.
  • Perzyna P. The constitutive equations for rate sensitive plastic materials//Quart. Appl. Math. -1963. -Vol. 20, no. 4. -P. 321-332.
  • Sloan S.W. Substepping schemes for the numerical integration of elastoplastic stress-strain relations//Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. -1989. -Vol. 24, no. 3. -P. 893-911.
  • Potts D.M., Zdravkovic L. Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: theory. -London: Thomas Telford, 1999. -440 p.
  • Wood D.M. Geotechnical modelling. -London: Spon Press, 2004.
  • Aboim C., Roth W. Bounding surface plasticity theory applied to cyclic loading of sand//Int. Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics, 1982. -P. 65-72.
  • Hirai H. An elastoplastic constitutive model for cyclic behaviour of sands//Int. J. Numer. Anal. Met. -1987. -Vol. 11, no. 5. -P. 503-520.
  • Zienkiewicz O., Mróz Z. Generalized plasticity formulation and application to geomechanics//Mechanics of Engineering Materials/Eds. C.S. Desai, R.H. Gallaher. -New York: Wiley, 1984. -P. 655-679.
Еще