About the philosophical revolutions, their ideological consequences and status of the philosophical knowledge (reflections under the book V. A. Kutyryov "The last kiss. Men as a tradition")

In the article the critical analysis of the materials of the book of the modern Russian philosopher V. A. Kutyryov dedicated to the treatment of the ideological consequences of Kantian philosophical revolution and other qualitative shifts which occurred in the European philosophical consciousness of new and newest time are presented. Raised in the book V. A. Kutyryov position of the author of the article in the fundamental circle of the problems is consisted in the following conclusions: 1) more productive appears for studying the processes of the mental history appears the moderately internalistic and cumulativistic methodology which emanated from the principles of the indirect and integrally contradictory nature of interaction of philosophy, societies and culture and ideological neutral oriented on the criterion of scientific nature and antikvaristic approach interpretation of historic-philosophical facts; 2) the connection of Kantian gnosiology, Euro-American epistemology, analytical philosophy and scientific study with the philosophy of postmodernism has historically concrete, complex and defined by example nature and is not derived by linear method; 3) a basic question of philosophy becomes universal philosophical principle only when the united, developed and single-valued in a cultured way system of philosophical concepts is present; 3) a basic question of philosophy becomes universal philosophical principle only when the united, developed and single-valued system of philosophical concepts are presented; 4) materialism as philosophical direction and school is remain in the modern philosophy however change scales, independence and degree of their ideological influence; 5) transcendentalism and cognitivism as stages on the way of creating the information machine intellect are not the indices of the «death of the man» since they the results of studies in the region of mathematical logic, logical semantics and philosophy of language are refuted.