On the category "non-law" in the paradigm of integrative law comprehension

The subject of the research is the content of the category of non-law, which is one of the most important categories in the concept of integrative law comprehension. The article analyzes Hegel's definition of non-law as a negation of law based on dialectical logic and the interpretation of non-law as a category denoting numerous social regulators of public relations not included in the system of forms of law proposed in the paradigm of integrative law comprehension. The author draws attention to the heterogeneity of non-law phenomena generalized by this category as well as reveals the formal-logical character of the distinction between law and non-law as contradictory concepts used to refer to essentially non-contradictory phenomena. The author also argues the thesis about the theoretical unproductiveness of separating law from non-law, which prevents their study as interacting opposites.