Online safety as a new component of digital literacy for young people

Автор: Tomczyk Lukasz, Eger Ludvik

Журнал: Интеграция образования @edumag-mrsu

Рубрика: Международный опыт интеграции образования

Статья в выпуске: 2 (99), 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. Digital literacy refers to the skills required to achieve digital competence, the confident and critical use of information and communication technology for learning, leisure, communication and future work of young people. Digital competence has a dual nature. First of all, it is the technical ability to operate programs, pages, equipment. Secondly, it is also the ability to use digital media safely. Both perspectives are important in the educational perspective, i.e. media education and socialisation. Materials and Methods. The paper presents the attempts to measure digital literacy in the area of threats resutling from using the new media in the group of upper-secondary school students (fourth educational cycle). The study was carried out using a diagnostic test with 18 questions. The research was conducted in the group of 1693 youths aged 15-21. The research was designed based on traditional methods of testing knowledge and skills. Results. The findings showed that the weakest digital literacy component was the copyright-related knowledge and the strongest area was online shopping and financial operations. All digital literacy components are interrelated. The improvement in one area leads to the development of other digital literacy elements. Despite this correlation, digital literacy is a heterogeneous concept. There are also differences regarding certain digital literacy components, determined by gender - girls obtained higher test results in terms of the soft competencies whereas boys were better with the technical aspects of digital literacy. Based on the cluster analysis, we noticed that 41.41% of the students obtained good and very good results from the competence test. More than half of the students require further education in most of the analysed areas. Discussion and Conclusion. For educational decision-makers, the findings highlight the importance of designing training programs aimed at developing students' digital literacies, with a special focus on new topics as sexting, piracy and cyberbullying.

Еще

Digital literacy, cybersafety, youth, protection of image, cyberbullying, sexting, digital piracy, hoax, measure, poland

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147221995

IDR: 147221995   |   DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.099.024.202002.172-184

Список литературы Online safety as a new component of digital literacy for young people

  • Flanigan A.E., Babchuk W.A. Social Media as Academic Quicksand: A Phenomenological Study of Student Experiences in and out of the Classroom. Learning and Individual Differences. 2015; 44:40-45. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.10167j.lindif.2015.11.003
  • Goodfellow R. Literacy, Literacies and the Digital in Higher Education. Teaching in Higher Education. 2011; 16(1):131-144. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.544125
  • Mazman S.G., Usluel Y.K. Modeling Educational Usage of Facebook. Computers & Education. 2010; 55(2):444-453. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.008
  • Stosic L., Stosic I. Perceptions of Teachers Regarding the Implementation of the Internet in Education. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015; 53:462-468. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/jxhb.2015.07.027
  • Wu Y.-T., Tsai Ch.-Ch. University Students' Internet Attitudes and Internet Self-Efficacy: A Study at Three Universities in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 2006; 9(4):441-450. (In Eng.) DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.441
  • Nyikes Z. Digital Competence and Safety Awareness Base on the Assessments Results of the Midle-East European Generations. Procedía Manufacturing. 2018; 22:916-922. (In Eng.)
  • Wilson M., Scalise C., Gochyev P. Rethinking DL: From Computer Skills to Socialnetwork Settings. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2015; 18:65-80. (In Eng.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.10167j.tsc.2015.05.001
  • List A. Defining Digital Literacy Development: An Examination of Preservice Teachers' Beliefs. Computers & Education. 2019; 138:146-158. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/jxompedu.2019.03.009
  • Rothagi A., Scherer R., Hetlevik O.E. The Role of ICT Self-Efficacy for Students' ICT Use and their Achievement in a Computer and Information Literacy Test. Computers & Education. 2016; 102:103-116. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/jxompedu.2016.08.001
  • Guzmán-Simón F., García-Jiménez E., López-Cobo I. Undergraduate Students' Perspectives on Digital Competence and Academic Literacy in Spanish University. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017; 74:196-204. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/jxhb.2017.04.040
  • Fraillon J., Schulz W., Friedman T., Ainley J., Gebhardt E. International Computer and Information Literacy Study: ICILS 2018: Technical Report. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15478/uuid:b9cdd888-6665-4e9f-a21e-61569845ed5b
  • Fraillon J., Ainlen J., Schultz W., Friedman T., Gebhardt E. Preparing for Live in Digital Edge. Melbourne: Springer; 2014. Available at: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319142210 (accessed 12.12.2019). (In Eng.)
  • Eshet-Alkalai Y. Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital Era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 2004; 13(1):93-106. Available at: https://www. openu.ac.il/personal_sites/download/Digital-literacy2004-JEMH.pdf (accessed 12.12.2019). (In Eng.)
  • Porat E., Blau I., Barak A. Measuring Digital Literacies: Junior High-School Students' Perceived Competencies versus Actual Performance. Computers & Education. 2018; 126:23-36. (In Eng.) DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.030
  • Rambousek V., Stípek J., Vaüoková P. Contents of Digital Literacy from the Perspective of Teachers and Pupils. Procedia. Social andBahavioral Sciences. 2016; 217:354-362. (In Eng.)
  • Ferrari A. DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. 2013. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2788/52966
  • Hatlewik O.E., Gudmundsdóttir G.B., Loi M. Digital Diversity among Upper Secondary Students: A Multilevel Analysis of the Relationship between Cultural Capital, Self-Efficacy, Strategic Use of Information and Digital Competence. Computers & Education. 2015; 81:345-353. (In Eng.) DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.019
  • Fenaughty J., Harré N. Factors Associated with Distressing Electronic Harassment and Cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013; 29(3):803-811. (In Eng.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jxhb.2012.11.008
  • Livingstone S., Smith P. K. Annual Research Review: Harms Experienced by Child Users of Online and Mobile Technologies: The Nature, Prevalence and Management of Sexual and Aggressive Risks in the Digital Age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2014; 55(6):635-654. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12197
  • Sabella A.R., Patchin W.J., Hinduja S. Cyberbullying Myths and Realities. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013; 29(6):2703-2711. (In Eng.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jxhb.2013.06.040
  • Tomczyk L., Srokowski L., Wqsinski A. [Digital Safety Competencies in Polish Schools]. Tarnów: Stowarzyszenie Miasta w Internecie; 2016. (In Pol.)
  • Siddiq F., Hatlevik O.E., Olsen V.R., Throndsen I., Scherer R. Taking a Future Perspective by Learning from the Past - A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments that Aim to Measure Primary and Secondary School Students' ICT. Educational Research Review. 2016; 19:58-84. (In Eng.) DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002
  • Kopecky K., Szotkowski R., Krejcí V. [Risk Forms of Behavior of Czech and Slovak Children in the Internet Environment]. 2015. (In Czech.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.5507/pdf.15.24448619
  • Gray D.E. Doing Research in the Real World. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2009. Available at: https:// www.academia.edu/29567720/Doing_Research_in_the_Real_Worl_-_David_E_Gray (accessed 12.12.2019). (In Eng.)
  • Ziemba E. Discussion on a Sustainable Information Society. Business Informatics - Informatyka Ekonomiczna. 2014; 1(31):13-25. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/ie.2014.1.01
  • Ziemba E. [Sustainable Information Society]. Katowice: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny; 2017. (In Pol.)
  • Macuh B., Raspor A., Sraka M., Kovacic A. Media Exposure and Education of First to Six Grade Children from Slovenia - Parent Opinions. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE). 2018; 6(3):49-57. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1803049M
  • Fleming M.J., Greentree S., Cocotti-Muller D., Elias K.A., Morrison S. Safety in Cyberspace. Youth & Society. 2006; 38(2):135-154. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x06287858
  • Istenic Starcic A., Lebenicnik M. Investigation of University Students' Perceptions of their Eductors as Role Models and Designers of Digitalized Curricula. Human Technology. 2020; 16(1):55-91. Available at: https://humantechnology.jyu.fi/archive/vol-16/issue-1/istenicstarcic_lebenicnik (accessed 11.03.2020). (In Eng.)
  • Tomczyk L. Digital Piracy among Adolescents - Scale and Sonditions. In: L. Tomczyk, A. Ryk, J. Prokop (ed.) New Trends and Research Challenges in Pedagogy and Andragogy. Krakow: Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie; 2018. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24917/9788394156893.5
  • Jang S.M., Kim J.K. Third Person Effects of Fake News: Fake News Regulation and Media Literacy Interventions. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018; 80:295-302. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.034
  • Potyrala K. [iEducation Synergy of New Media and Didactics]. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Pedagogicznego; 2017. (In Pol.)
  • Pyzalski J. Family and School in Prevention of Online Risk Behaviours in Young People. Dziecko krzywdzone. Teoria, badania,praktyka. 2013; 12(1):99-109. Available at: http://dzieckokrzywdzone.fdds.pl/ index.php/DK/article/view/83/72 (accessed 12.12.2019). (In Pol., abstract in Eng.)
  • Plichta P. [Socialization and Education of Children and Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities in the Digital Age]. Torun: Wydaw. Adam Marszalek; 2017. (In Pol.)
  • Pyzalski J., Zdrodowska A., Tomczyk L., Abramczuk K. [Polish Research EU KIDS ONLINE. The Most Important Results and Conclusions]. Poznan: Wydaw. Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza; 2019. (In Pol.)
  • Stähl T. How ICT Savvy are Digital Natives Actually? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy. 2017; 12(03):89-108. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2017-03-04
  • Blankenship R. Are Digital Natives Real? Exploring the Myths and Realities of the Digital Native Existence. Inted 2017Proceedings. 2017. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.1832
  • McKnight K. The First Generation of True Digital Natives. Research World. 2018; 70:14-17. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rwm3.20659
  • Lee S.-H. Digital Literacy Education for the Development of Digital Literacy. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence. 2014; 5(3):29-43. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdldc.2014070103
  • Livingstone S., Bober M., Helsper E. Internet Literacy among Children and Young People: Findings from the UK Children Go Online Project; 2005. (In Eng.)
  • Berge O. Rethinking Digital Literacy in Nordic School Curricula. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy. 2017; 12(01-02):5-7. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2017-01-02-01
  • Eger L., Klement M., Tomczyk L., Pisonova M., Petrova G. Different User Groups of University Students and their ICT Competence: Evidence from Three Countries in Central Europe. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2018; 17(5):851-866. Available at: http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1539418548.pdf (accessed 12.12.2019). (In Eng.)
Еще
Статья научная