Ontological paradoxes in the system of public strategic management

In the article the authors accentuate the scientific community on the processes of strategic management. Responding to his appearance on emerging business issues, strategic management in the West continues the evolutionary development, both in practical and in scientific field. Evidence of this is the search for relevant sense of the object of strategic management. System of strategic management in Russia is evidently in the process of its formation. This, however, leads to the presence of the so-called institutional traps, and therefore to emergence of ontological paradoxes. It is possible to justify the emerging ontological paradoxes - situations in which reality differs from the planned state and the desired effect, despite the fact that all actions taken were aimed at their achievement. In the coordinate system of the «action - inaction», «incentive - disincentive», the authors build the holarchy forms of participation of subjects - from the utilitarian to conduct «institutional traps» (the presence in the system of perverse incentives that block the activity of participants of the system) and «institutional provocations» (the activity of participants aimed at the use of «institutional traps» for the redistribution of resources in order to obtain benefits for themselves or for third parties). The remarkable conclusion made by the authors about the presence of «traps» and «provocations» in the law itself. The article described the «glossary trap», «trap of pessimism», «the provocation of sight», «the provocation of the substitution of strategic objectives», «provocation of inaction». The uniqueness lies in the classification behavior of participants in the system of state strategic planning, which allows to develop countermeasures «traps» and «provocations» that occurs at the stage of rulemaking, and also to neutralize cultural inertia, defined as the effect of the theory of institutional traps.