Definition per genus proximum et differentiam specificam and legal language
Автор: Ogleznev Vitaly, Surovtsev Valery
Журнал: Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция @classics-nsu-schole
Рубрика: Право и философия: с аналитической точки зрения
Статья в выпуске: 2 т.9, 2015 года.
Бесплатный доступ
This essay is concerned with the applicability in modern conceptual jurisprudence of a particular methodology for defining concepts, namely, per genus proximum et differentiam specificam. We explicate the origin of this method and how it was applied by Aristotle, Porphyry, and Boethius, arguing that H. L. A. Hart's views about the “open texture” of language, which is context-sensitive, call into question the applicability of this methodology in modern conceptual jurisprudence.
Aristotle, porphyry, boethius, definitio per genus proximum et differentiam specificam, legal language, h. l. a. hart, j. bentham
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147103415
IDR: 147103415
