Performance Analysis of Resampling Techniques on Class Imbalance Issue in Software Defect Prediction

Performance Analysis of Resampling Techniques on Class Imbalance Issue in Software Defect Prediction

Автор: Ahmed Iqbal, Shabib Aftab, Faseeha Matloob

Журнал: International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science @ijitcs

Статья в выпуске: 11 Vol. 11, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Predicting the defects at early stage of software development life cycle can improve the quality of end product at lower cost. Machine learning techniques have been proved to be an effective way for software defect prediction however an imbalance dataset of software defects is the main issue of lower and biased performance of classifiers. This issue can be resolved by applying the re-sampling methods on software defect dataset before the classification process. This research analyzes the performance of three widely used resampling techniques on class imbalance issue for software defect prediction. The resampling techniques include: “Random Under Sampling”, “Random Over Sampling” and “Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE)”. For experiments, 12 publically available cleaned NASA MDP datasets are used with 10 widely used supervised machine learning classifiers. The performance is evaluated through various measures including: F-measure, Accuracy, MCC and ROC. According to results, most of the classifiers performed better with “Random Over Sampling” technique in many datasets.

Еще

Software Defect predication, Imbalanced Dataset, Resampling Methods, Random Under Sampling, Random Oversampling, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15017086

IDR: 15017086   |   DOI: 10.5815/ijitcs.2019.11.05

Список литературы Performance Analysis of Resampling Techniques on Class Imbalance Issue in Software Defect Prediction

  • U. R. Salunkhe and S. N. Mali, “A hybrid approach for class imbalance problem in customer churn prediction: A novel extension to under-sampling,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 71–81, 2018.
  • S. Wang and X. Yao, “Using class imbalance learning for software defect prediction,” IEEE Trans. Reliab., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 434–443, 2013.
  • X. Yu, J. Liu, Z. Yang, X. Jia, Q. Ling, and S. Ye, “Learning from Imbalanced Data for Predicting the Number of Software Defects,” Proc. - Int. Symp. Softw. Reliab. Eng. ISSRE, vol. 2017-October, pp. 78–89, 2017.
  • L. Pelayo and S. Dick, “Applying novel resampling strategies to software defect prediction,” Annu. Conf. North Am. Fuzzy Inf. Process. Soc. - NAFIPS, pp. 69–72, 2007.
  • D. Tomar and S. Agarwal, “Prediction of Defective Software Modules Using Class Imbalance Learning,” Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Comput., vol. 2016, pp. 1–12, 2016.
  • N. F. Hordri, S. S. Yuhaniz, N. F. M. Azmi, and S. M. Shamsuddin, “Handling class imbalance in credit card fraud using resampling methods,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 390–396, 2018.
  • A. Iqbal, S. Aftab, U. Ali, Z. Nawaz, L. Sana, M. Ahmad, and A. Husen “Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques on Software Defect Prediction using NASA Datasets,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 10, no. 5, 2019.
  • D. Bowes, T. Hall, and J. Petrić, “Software defect prediction: do different classifiers find the same defects?,” Softw. Qual. J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 525–552, 2018
  • A. Iqbal, S. Aftab, I. Ullah, M. S. Bashir, and M. A. Saeed, “A Feature Selection based Ensemble Classification Framework for Software Defect Prediction,” Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 54-64, 2019.
  • M. Ahmad, S. Aftab, I. Ali, and N. Hameed, “Hybrid Tools and Techniques for Sentiment Analysis: A Review,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, 2017.
  • M. Ahmad, S. Aftab, S. S. Muhammad, and S. Ahmad, “Machine Learning Techniques for Sentiment Analysis: A Review,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 27, 2017.
  • M. Ahmad, S. Aftab, M. S. Bashir, N. Hameed, I. Ali, and Z. Nawaz, “SVM Optimization for Sentiment Analysis,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 4, 2018.
  • M. Ahmad, S. Aftab, M. S. Bashir, and N. Hameed, “Sentiment Analysis using SVM: A Systematic Literature Review,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 2, 2018.
  • M. Ahmad, S. Aftab, and I. Ali, “Sentiment Analysis of Tweets using SVM,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 25–29, 2017.
  • M. Ahmad and S. Aftab, “Analyzing the Performance of SVM for Polarity Detection with Different Datasets,” Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 29–36, 2017.
  • S. Aftab, M. Ahmad, N. Hameed, M. S. Bashir, I. Ali, and Z. Nawaz, “Rainfall Prediction in Lahore City using Data Mining Techniques,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 4, 2018.
  • S. Aftab, M. Ahmad, N. Hameed, M. S. Bashir, I. Ali, and Z. Nawaz, “Rainfall Prediction using Data Mining Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 5, 2018.
  • A. Iqbal and S. Aftab, “A Feed-Forward and Pattern Recognition ANN Model for Network Intrusion Detection,” Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 19–25, 2019.
  • A. Iqbal, S. Aftab, I. Ullah, M. A. Saeed, and A. Husen, “A Classification Framework to Detect DoS Attacks,” Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 40-47, 2019.
  • S. Huda et al., “A Framework for Software Defect Prediction and Metric Selection,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, no. c, pp. 2844–2858, 2017.
  • E. Erturk and E. Akcapinar, “A comparison of some soft computing methods for software fault prediction,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1872–1879, 2015.
  • M. Shepperd, Q. Song, Z. Sun and C. Mair, “Data Quality: Some Comments on the NASA Software Defect Datasets,” IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 39, pp. 1208–1215, 2013.
  • “NASA Defect Dataset.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/klainfo/NASADefectDataset. [Accessed: 14-August-2019].
  • B. Ghotra, S. McIntosh, and A. E. Hassan, “Revisiting the impact of classification techniques on the performance of defect prediction models,” Proc. - Int. Conf. Softw. Eng., vol. 1, pp. 789–800, 2015.
  • G. Czibula, Z. Marian, and I. G. Czibula, “Software defect prediction using relational association rule mining,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 264, pp. 260–278, 2014.
  • D. Rodriguez, I. Herraiz, R. Harrison, J. Dolado, and J. C. Riquelme, “Preliminary comparison of techniques for dealing with imbalance in software defect prediction,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. ACM, p. 43, 2014.
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp