Political subjectness: a case of transdisciplinary reflection

Автор: Kiyashchenko Larisa P., Golofast Anastasia V.

Журнал: Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология @fsf-vestnik

Рубрика: Философия

Статья в выпуске: 4 (48), 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article attempts to comprehend the issues that arise in connection with the spread of transdisciplinary strategies.These are questions to actualize the consideration of transdisciplinarity, as a phenomenon hierarchically associated with an interdisciplinary form of human activity, which is considered as a heuristic primordial foundation of the modern stylistics of philosophizing. It clarifies, redefines, through the filter of the existential problems to be solved, the generally accepted provisions and laws of disciplinary knowledge, using the paradoxicality of the reflexive-recursive subject-object relations of postnonclassics. Political subjectivity can be considered a term in social and political philosophy that accounts for the ability to introduce change in the internal and external areas of the political form. Political subjects execute power in different ways and on different levels of the multilevel governance structure. On each level political subjects come into existence, develop and mature and then proceed with deconstruction. Political morphogenesis is a complex phenomenon. The main target for the closed political subjects is selfpreservation as these political forms have an in-built development ceiling, whereas the main target for the open political subjects is evolution as a process that is isomorphous with the environment. Political morphogenesis has an interval character: it happens mostly under the circumstances of uncertainty and unpredictability of the political life when the political form’s old parameters of order are no longer functional while the new order parameters have not been established yet. This is the momentum when political entrepreneurs enter the political stage - those are political subjects that extract value from uncertainty by offering a crisis management initiative that eventually leads to the empowerment of the political entrepreneur by granting it more power and a widened authority scope.


Authority delegation, path dependence, political complexity, political subject, transdisciplinarity

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147236926

IDR: 147236926   |   DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-569-581

Список литературы Political subjectness: a case of transdisciplinary reflection

  • Alekseeva, I.Yu. and Arshinov, V.I. (2016). In-formatsionnoye obshchestvo i NBICS-revolyutsiya [Information society and NBICS revolution]. Moscow: IPh RAS Publ., 196 p.
  • Caropaso, J. and Jupille, J. (1998). States, Agency, and Rules: The EU in Global Environmental Politics. The European Union in the World Community, ed. by C. Rhodes. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publ., pp. 213-229.
  • Coser, L. (1964). The Functions of Social Conflict: An Examination of the Concept of Social Conflict and Its Use in Empirical Sociological Research. New York: Free Press, 188 p.
  • Fukuyama F., (2015). Political Order andPoliti-cal Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux Publ., 672 p.
  • Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 162 p.
  • Kiyashchenko, L.P. (2015). [The anxiety of becoming whole. Variations on the theme of transdisci-plinarity]. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 11, pp. 76-86.
  • Kiyashchenko, L.P. (2016). [Interdisciplinarity -field of philosophy's and sociology's crossing interests]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. No. 2, pp. 3-11.
  • Kiyashchenko, L.P. (2016). [«Syndrome of para-digmality» in the development dynamics of modern knowledge]. Problemy etiki: Filosofsko-eticheskiy al'manakh [Ethical Problems: Philosophical and Ethical Almanac]. Moscow: MSU Publ., iss. VI, pp. 37-54.
  • Kiyashchenko, L.P. (2017). [Personality as a hologram in transdisciplinary culture]. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 11, pp. 58-67.
  • Lake, D. (2010). Authority, Coercion, and Power in International Relations. APSA 2010 AnnualMeet-ing Paper. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1643751 (accessed 28.07.2021).
  • Mbembe, J.-A. and Meintjes, L. (2003). Ne-cropolitics. Public Culture. Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 11-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-15-1-11
  • Pollack, M. (2007). Principal-Agent Analysis and International Delegation: Red Herrings, Theoretical Clarifications and Empirical Disputes. Bruges Political Research Paper. No. 2. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1011324 (accessed 28.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1011324
  • Roeder, Ph. (2007). Where Nation-States Come From: Institutional Change in the Age of Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 430 p.
  • Sabatier, P. (1988). An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences. Vol. 21,no. 2/3, pp. 129-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00136406
  • Schelling, Th. (1971). The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 309 p.
  • Tomz, M. (2007). Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt across Three Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 328 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400842926
Статья научная