Problematic aspects of the recovery of court costs for the payment of services of a representative in a case under the jurisdiction of the arbitration court

The problems of the distribution of court costs for the services of a representative have become the subject of research by many process scientists. To this day, many scientists, lawyers, jurists are trying to uncover all the problematic aspects related to the distribution of court costs, including the payment of the services of a representative, and try to eliminate them. But there are not so few of them, and many of them are still not identified and have not been eradicated. In our article, we will try to reveal the most important of them and offer the most correct options for how the court should act when distributing court costs related to paying for the services of a representative and point out those moments in which court costs should be collected from the side, even if they are not fully satisfied by the court (for drafting documents such as petitions for attaching documents to the case file, for postponing the trial, or for a break in the court session, and others). We also concluded that the court should initially pay attention to the fact in whose favor the decision was made, using the criterion of reasonableness.