Problems of regulation of indirect relationship of state and commercial experts when evaluating the expert's conclusions in judicial sessions

The article is devoted to a modern critical view of the expert opinion when assessing evidence in court. In particular, it is said about the bipolar structure of the conclusion (legal and special) with a predominance of the latter. In this connection, the experience and competence that both the reviewer (a non-state expert who evaluates on a commercial basis) and the head of the state forensic institution possess. As a solution to the problem, the authors of the article propose to acquaint the expert with the review in advance, as well as to involve the head of the expert institution during the interrogation as a kind of surety and guarantor.