The ways “genes-traits” are not confess

Today we observe victorious procession of an epigenetic paradigm of inheritance, development and variability [1] and backdown by the traditional genotcentric paradigm which is based on “the central dogma” of molecular genetics offered F. Crick [2] and claiming that genes, like dictators (or generals) send on a railway line “gene-trait” the staff car with the officer of communication who in a package convay orders to traits - what they have to become: qualitative - what structure or color they must to have, and - quantitative - what size their average (genotypic) value and genotypic variance. This “railroad” stands on many “bridges” of many the genocentric of the hypotheses made at the beginning of the 20th century and which still strictly aren't proved though in many textbooks of genetics these hypotheses are presented as the standard theories. Epigenetic researches gradually “blow up bridges” under “rails” from genes to traits. Authors would like to share by history of opening of these phenomena and their studying with readers of this article.