Providing the constitutional transparency principle of the juridical power during all stages of civil legal proceedings which are not concerning to trial

In the article, the constitutional principle of transparency of the Russian Federation's judicial power is considered together with the definition of the given principle. The constitutional principle of transparency of the judicial power is a principle developing of interconnected provisions: article 1 (part 1), article 3 (part 1 and part 2), article 24 (part 2), article 29, article 123 (part 1) of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and added with standards of other laws, underlying the organization and activity of all judicial authority which provides possibility to citizens, to associations, the state and municipal authorities, without difficulties, to receive full, reliable and objective information on activity of judicial authority at observance of the restrictions established by the federal law. The constitutional principle of transparency of judicial authority of the Russian Federation extends the action to all aspects of its activity and the organization. And, of course, it is one of the most important principles of the Russian civil legal proceedings. This principle is realized at all stages of civil legal proceedings. At one stages of civil legal proceedings it is realized completely, at other stages with some restrictions. Fairly often, the constitutional principle fixed in the article 123 part 1, becomes an object of the research. In a science of the constitutional law the content of such beginning comes only to the openness of a stage of the trial. Such treatment of the principle, in accordance with the opinion of the scientists, follows from the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In the article, distinctive features of the provision of the principle at all stages of civil legislation, which are not concerning to a trial, have been revealed: an initiation of proceedings of a civil case in a court and a stage of preparation to a trial. The author concludes, that the given principle is realized at stages prior to a trial, but with those restrictions which are led to the openness and accessibility of court decision and all records of preliminary examination.