Rose angina score can really estimate myocardial perfusion scan results in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients?

Автор: Namiranian Nasim, Naghedi Aryan, Soltani Narges, Moghadam Reza Nafisi, Shahbaz Amir Pasha Amel, Razavi-Ratki Seid Kazem

Журнал: Cardiometry @cardiometry

Рубрика: Original research

Статья в выпуске: 16, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Aims Cardiovascular diseases are among the most important causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. There are different risk factors explained for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus (DM) is notable among them. There are different modalities for diagnosis and risk assessment of cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) but considering high price and low accessibility of this modality we decided to assess any possible association between MPI findings and Rose angina score (RAS) in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Materials and methods In this descriptive-analytic study we enrolled 585 diabetic and non-diabetic patients with angina pectoris referred to nuclear medicine department of Shahid Sadoughi hospital, Yazd, Iran for MPI. Patients demographic information along with MPI results and Rose angina questionnaire were obtained. Data were finally analyzed using SPSS ver.21 software using appropriate statistical tests. Results in this study, there were 294 diabetic and 291 non diabetic patients enrolled. 61.9% of non-diabetic patients had normal MPI results but this amount was only 38.8% among diabetic patients. Our study population did not differ based on age, gender and Rose angina score between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Our results indicate that there is a statistically significant association between RAS and MPI findings in both diabetic (P-value=0.001) and non-diabetic (P-value=0.001) patients.Conclusion In present study we found a significant association between simple RAS questionnaire and MPI findings. We do not deny high accuracy and diagnostic value of MPI but we want to focus on clinical judgement of physicians prior to imaging modalities. We believe that in many cases, with a good clinical assessment such as RAS, many unnecessary and expensive modalities can be avoided.

Еще

Rose angina score, rose angina questionnaire, diabetes mellitus, myocardial perfusion scan, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, ischemia

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148311459

IDR: 148311459   |   DOI: 10.12710/cardiometry.2020.16.111116

Список литературы Rose angina score can really estimate myocardial perfusion scan results in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients?

  • Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update. European heart journal. 2013;34(39):3028-34.
  • Deaton C, Froelicher ES, Wu LH, Ho C, Shishani K, Jaarsma T. The global burden of cardiovascular disease. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2011;10(2_suppl):S5-S13.
  • Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascu¬lar risk factors: the Framingham study. Circulation. 1979;59(1):8-13.
  • Kannel WB. Blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk fac¬tor: prevention and treatment. Jama. 1996; 275(20): 1571-6.
  • Grundy SM. Metabolic syndrome: a multiplex car¬diovascular risk factor. The Journal of Clinical Endo-crinology & Metabolism. 2007;92(2):399-404.
  • Bateman TM. Advantages and disadvantages of PET and SPECT in a busy clinical practice. Journal of Nu-clear Cardiology. 2012;19(1):3-11.
  • Sabharwal NK, Stoykova B, Taneja AK, Lahiri A. A randomized trial of exercise treadmill ECG versus stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging as an ini¬tial diagnostic strategy in stable patients with chest pain and suspected CAD: cost analysis. Journal of nu¬clear cardiology. 2007;14(2):174.
  • Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Santana CA, Kraw¬czynska EG, De Braal L, et al. Diagnostic performance of an expert system for the interpretation of myocardi¬al perfusion SPECT studies. Journal of Nuclear Medi¬cine. 2001;42(8):1185-91.
  • Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, Saha GB, Neu¬mann DR, Underwood DA, et al. A prospective com-parison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyr-idamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery dis¬ease. Journal of nuclear medicine: official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 1990;31(12):1899-905.
  • Verani MS. Myocardial perfusion imaging versus two-dimensional echocardiography: comparative val-ue in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 1994;1(4):399-414.
  • Otsuka R, Miyazaki Y, Kubo N, Kawahara M, Ta¬kaesu J, Fukuchi K. The Status of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 99mTc Pharmaceuticals in Japan: Results from a Nationwide Survey. Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 2018;6(2):90.
  • Gaziano TA. Cardiovascular disease in the devel¬oping world and its cost-effective management. Circu-lation. 2005;112(23):3547-53.
  • Rose G. Variability of angina. Some implications for epidemiology. British journal of preventive & so¬cial medicine. 1968;22(1):12.
  • Rahman MA, Spurrier N, Mahmood MA, Rah¬man M, Choudhury SR, Leeder S. Rose Angina Ques-tionnaire: validation with cardiologists' diagnoses to detect coronary heart disease in Bangladesh. indian heart journal. 2013;65(1):30-9.
  • Bastos M-S, Lotufo PA, Whitaker AL, Bensenor IM. Validation of the short-version of Rose Angina Ques¬tionnaire in Brazil. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012;99(5):1056-9.
  • Kannel WB, D'Agostino RB, Wilson PW, Belanger AJ, Gagnon DR. Diabetes, fibrinogen, and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Framingham experience. American heart journal. 1990;120(3):672-6.
  • Ford ES, Zhao G, Li C. Pre-diabetes and the risk for cardiovascular disease: a systematic review of the evi¬dence. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;55(13):1310-7.
  • Zhou B, Lu Y, Hajifathalian K, Bentham J, Di Ce¬sare M, Danaei G, et al. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4· 4 million participants. The Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1513-30.
  • Grundy SM, Benjamin IJ, Burke GL, Chait A, Eck¬el RH, Howard BV, et al. Diabetes and cardiovascu¬lar disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 1999;100(10):1134-46.
  • Habibian S, Eyni E, Emami H, Azizi F. Prevalence of Rose Questionnaire Angina and It's Association With Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors In Tehran, IR Iran. 2000.
  • Fakhrzadeh H, Nabipour I, Dehdari A. The asso¬ciation of hypertension and ischemic heart disease; a population-based study. 2001.
  • Sadeghi M, Rouhafza H, Shirani S, AKHAVAN TA, Aghdak P, Hosseini S. The prevalence of coronary artery disease according to Rose Questionnaire and ECG: Isfahan Healthy Heart Program (IHHP). 2006.
  • Poudel M, Bhandari R, Malla G, Baral D, Upre¬ty S, Chaudhary R, et al. Rose Angina Questionnaire: Validation in emergency department to detect myo¬cardial infarction in a tertiary hospital of eastern Nepal. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019:1024907919836573.
  • Hui G, Koch B, Calara F, Wong ND. Angina in coro¬nary artery disease patients with and without diabetes: US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2010. Clinical cardiology. 2016;39(1):30-6.
  • Park G-M, An H, Lee S-W, Cho Y-R, Gil EH, Her SH, et al. Risk score model for the assessment of coro-nary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Medicine. 2015;94(4).
Еще
Статья научная