Modern historiographical discourse on the formal and substantive aspects of Russian philosophy (end of the 70s. XX century - the first quarter of the XXI century)

The article attempts to identify and analyze some formal and substantive aspects of modern historiographical discourse on the problems of Russian philosophy. Using a wide range of sources, the article conventionally identifies such “languages” of representation of the problems of Russian philosophy as “artistic philosophizing”, “publicistic philosophizing”, “religious philosophizing”, “media philosophizing” and others. On the basis of the meanings presented in the texts of the representatives of each of the selected directions, the substantive aspects of the modern historiographical discourse of the problems of Russian philosophy are analyzed. The following universal “themes” of historiographical discourse are outlined: what is the essence of Russian philosophy; what is the meaning of the “Russian idea”; what is the specificity of Russian philosophy in the space of the world philosophical discourse, etc. The features of the representation of the content of the indicated questions in “languages” are presented, different in formal characteristics of “philosophizing”, taking into account the reference to the texts of such “iconic” figures in the modern artistic, educational and academic philosophical space as A.A. Voznesensky, F.I. Girenok, A.A. Huseynov, S.D. Dovlatov, N.S. Mikhalkov, V.A. Sidur, A.D. Sukhov and others.