Flexible rings in comparison with rigid rings in the treatment of functional tricuspid insufficiency: two different models of reverse remodeling of the right heart

Objective. To compare the models of reverse remodeling of the right heart after the tricuspid valve repair with rigid or flexible rings.Material and Methods. During the period from September, 2016 to February, 2018, 308 patients who had indications for intervention on the mitral valve and concomitant tricuspid insufficiency without significant differences in clinical status were randomized into two groups. Patients of both groups underwent intervention on the mitral valve with concomitant tricuspid valve repair by a rigid ring (Rigid group, n=154) or a flexible ring (Flex group, n=154)Results. The perioperative mortality rates were 2.0% in the Rigid group and 2.5% in the Flex group (p=0.504). There was no difference in the pacemaker implantation rate (5.1% vs. 2.6%, p=0.238). Freedom from tricuspid insufficiency recurrence at 12 months follow-up was comparable (96.7% in the Rigid group vs 96.1% in the Flex group, p=0.521). The global systolic function of the right ventricle (fractional change in area, FAC; ejection fraction, EF) significantly increased in both groups (p