Научные статьи
\
Прикладные науки. Медицина. Технология
\
Mедицинские науки
\
Патология. Клиническая медицина
\
Заболевания мочеполовой системы
Сравнение открытой, лапароскопической и роботизированной радикальных простатэктомий по клиническим результатам и стоимости лечения (обзор литературы)
Автор: Катибов Магомед Исламбегович, Аполихин Олег Иванович
Журнал: Вестник Российского научного центра рентгенорадиологии Минздрава России @vestnik-rncrr
Рубрика: Обзоры
Статья в выпуске: 3 т.11, 2011 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Обзор литературы показал, что лапароскопическая и роботизированная методики радикальной простатэктомии не дают преимуществ перед открытой операцией и не приводят к предполагаемым выгодам для пациентов. Различия по основным результатам между видами радикальной простатэктомии являются незначительными и обусловлены меньшими сроками пребывания больных в стационаре, но при этом расходы на выполнение лапароскопической и роботизированной операций значительно выше, чем на выполнение открытой операции. Полученные данные свидетельствуют, что результаты любого вмешательства в большей степени зависят от способностей хирурга, чем от методики выполнения радикальной простатэктомии. С учетом отсутствия существенных преимуществ малоинвазивных методик, короткого периода кривой обучения, полученных отдаленных результатов и низких затрат на лечение открытая техника по-прежнему остается «золотым стандартом» радикального хирургического лечения рака предстательной железы.
Рак предстательной железы, радикальная простатэктомия, лапароскопическая простатэктомия, роботизированная простатэктомия
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14955264
IDR: 14955264
Comparison of clinical results and treatment cost of open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical prostatectomy
The review showed that, overall, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy outcomes have not proved superior to open radical prostatectomy outcomes or resulted in anticipated benefits to patients. The differences among major outcomes are minor and associated with shorter lengths of stay, the costs associated with laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy are significantly higher than with open radical prostatectomy. In addition, current data seem to suggest that results of any of the procedures depend more on the surgeon's ability than on the approach. Therefore, considering the nonsuperiority of the other techniques, the shorter learning curves, the available long-term outcome data, and low expenses for treatment the open technique remains the gold standard.
Список литературы Сравнение открытой, лапароскопической и роботизированной радикальных простатэктомий по клиническим результатам и стоимости лечения (обзор литературы)
- Middleton R.G., Thompson I.M., Austenfeld M.S. et al. Prostate cancer clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. The American Urological Association//J. Urol. -1995. -Vol. 154, N 6. -P. 2144-2148.
- Bivalacqua T.J., Pierorazio P.M., Su L.M. Open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: optimizing the surgical approach//Surg. Oncol. -2009. -Vol. 18, N 3. -P. 233-241.
- Parsons J.K., Bennett J.L. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy//Urology. -2008. -Vol. 72, N 2. -P. 412-416.
- Nelson B., Kaufman M., Broughton G. et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 177, N 3. -Р. 929-931.
- Poulakis V., Witzsch U., de Vries R. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in men older than 70 years of age with localized prostate cancer: comparison of morbidity, reconvalescence, and short-term clinical outcomes between younger and older men//Eur. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 51, N 5. -Р. 1341-1348.
- Artibani W., Grosso G., Novara G. et al. Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy//Eur. Urol. -2003. -Vol. 44, N 4. -Р. 401-406.
- Touijer K., Eastham J.A., Secin F.P. et al. Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005//J. Urol. -2008. -Vol. 179, N 5. -Р. 1811-1817.
- Salomon L., Levrel O., de la Taille A. et al. Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center//Eur. Urol. -2002. -Vol. 42, N 2. -Р. 104-110.
- Hu J.C., Nelson R.A., Wilson T.G. et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 175, N 2. -Р. 541-546.
- Menon M., Tewari A., Baize B. et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience//Urology. -2002. -Vol. 60, N 5. -Р. 864-868.
- Bhayani S.B., Pavlovich C.P., Hsu T.S. et al. Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy//Urology. -2003. -Vol. 61, N 3. -Р. 612-616.
- Webster T.M., Herrell S.D., Chang S.S. et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain//J. Urol. -2005. -Vol. 174, N 3. -Р. 912-914.
- Tewari A., Menon M. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: surgical technique and current results//Curr. Urol. Rep. -2003. -Vol. 4, N 2. -P. 119-123.
- Han M., Partin A. W., Pound C. R. et al. Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience//Urol. Clin. North Am. -2001. -Vol. 28, N 3. -P. 555-565.
- Lepor H., Nieder A. M., Ferrandino M. N. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases//J. Urol. -2001. -Vol. 166, N 5. -P. 1729-1733.
- Augustin H., Pummer K., Daghofer F. et al. Patient self-reporting questionnaire on urological morbidity and bother after radical retropubic prostatectomy//Eur. Urol. -2002. -Vol. 42, N 2. -Р. 112-117.
- Roehl K.A., Han M., Ramos C.G. et al. Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results//J. Urol. -2004. -Vol. 172, N 3. -Р. 910-914.
- Bianco F.J. Jr., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta")//Urology. -2005. -Vol. 66, N 5 (Suppl.). -Р. 83-94.
- Saranchuk J.W., Kattan M.W., Elkin E. et al. Achieving optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy//J. Clin. Oncol. -2005. -Vol. 23, N 18. -Р. 4146-4151.
- Chun F.K., Graefen M., Zacharias M. et al. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer//World J. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 24, N 3. -Р. 273-280.
- Porter C.R., Kodama K., Gibbons R.P. et al. 25-year prostate cancer control and survival outcomes: a 40-year radical prostatectomy single institution series//J. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 176, N 2. -Р. 569-574.
- Sacco E., Prayer-Galetti T., Pinto F. et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up//BJU Int. -2006. -Vol. 97, N 6. -Р. 1234-1241.
- Велиев Е.И. Оптимизация хирургического лечения больных локализованным раком предстательной железы: Дис. … д-ра мед. наук. -СПб., 2003. -348 с.
- Ракул С.А. Рак предстательной железы: диагностика, результаты хирургического лечения и качество жизни: Дис. … д-ра мед. наук. -СПб., 2009. -309 с.
- Brown J.A., Garlitz C., Gomella L.G. et al. Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens//Urology. -2003. -Vol. 62, N 3. -Р. 481-486.
- Khan M.A., Partin A.W. Surgical margin status after radical retropubic prostatectomy//BJU Int. -2005. -Vol. 95, N 3. -Р. 281-284.
- Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19185977//Eur. Urol. -2009. -Vol. 55, N 5. -P. 1037-1063.
- Ahlering T.E., Woo D., Eichel L. et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes//Urology. -2004. -Vol. 63, N 5. -Р. 819-822.
- Smith J.A. Jr., Chan R.C., Chang S.S. et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 178, N 6. -P. 2385-2389.
- Krambeck A.E., DiMarco D.S., Rangel L.J. et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques//BJU Int. -2009. -Vol. 103, N 4. -Р. 448-453.
- DiMarco D.S., Ho K.L., Leibovich B.C. Early complications and surgical margin status following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RARP) compared to robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP)//J. Urol. -2005. -Vol. 173, N 1. -P. 277.
- Rozet F., Galiano M., Cathelineau X. et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases//J. Urol. -2005. -Vol. 174, N 3. -Р. 908-911.
- Joseph J.V., Vicente I., Madeb R. et al. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? BJU Int. -2005. -Vol. 96, N 1. -Р. 39-42.
- Guillonneau B., Cathelineau X., Doublet J.D. et al. Laparoscopic prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures//Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. -2002. -Vol. 43, N 2. -P. 123-133.
- Rassweiler J., Stolzenburg J., Sulser T. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy-the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group//Eur. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 49, N 1. -Р. 113-119.
- Menon M., Shrivastava A., Kaul S. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results//Eur. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 51, N 3. -Р. 648-57.
- Murphy D.G., Challacombe B.J., Costello A.J. Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy//Asian J. Androl. -2009. -Vol. 11, N 1. -Р. 94-99.
- Kao T. C., Cruess D. F., Garner D. et al. Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2000. -Vol. 163, N 3. -P. 858-864.
- Stanford J.L., Feng Z., Hamilton A.S. et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study//JAMA. -2000. -Vol. 283, N 3. -Р. 354-360.
- Graefen M., Walz.J, Huland H. Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy//Eur. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 49, N 1. -Р. 38-48.
- Hoznek A., Salomon L., Olsson L.E. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The Créteil experience//Eur. Urol. -2001. -Vol. 40, N 1. -Р. 38-45.
- Djavan B., Eckersberger E., Finkelstein J. et al. Oncologic, functional, and cost analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical prostatectomy//Eur. Urol. Suppl. -2010. -Vol. 9, N 3. -Р. 371-378.
- Anastasiadis A.G., Salomon L., Katz R. et al. Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome//Urology. -2003. -Vol. 62, N 2. -Р. 292-297.
- Stolzenburg J.U., Rabenalt R., Dо M. et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures//J. Urol. -2005. -Vol. 174, N 4 (Pt. 1). -Р. 1271-1275.
- Su L.M., Link R.E., Bhayani S.B. et al. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique//Urology. -2004. -Vol. 64, N 1. -Р. 123-127.
- Katz R., Salomon L., Hoznek A. et al. Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2002. -Vol. 168, N 5. -Р. 2078-2082.
- Rassweiler J., Seemann O., Schulze M. et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution//J. Urol. -2003. -Vol. 169, N 5. -Р. 1689-1693.
- Curto F., Benijts J., Pansadoro A. et al. Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique//Eur. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 49, N 2. -Р. 344-352.
- Türk I., Deger S., Winkelmann B. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases//Eur. Urol. -2001. -Vol. 40, N 1. -Р. 46-52.
- Wagner A.A., Link R.E., Trock B.J. et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy outcomes from a surgeon's early experience//Urology. -2007. -Vol. 70, N 4. -Р. 667-671.
- Schwab II C.W., Fabrizio M.D., Given R.W. Prospective longitudinal comparison of health related quality of life in patients undergoing treatment for localized prostate cancer: an evaluation of three surgical treatment modalities from a single institution//J. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 177, N 1. -Р. 7.
- Lepor H., McCullough A., Engel J.D. Renewing intimacy: advances in treating erectile dysfunction postprostatectomy//Rev. Urol. -2008. -Vol. 10, N 4. -Р. 245-253.
- Joseph J.V., Rosenbaum R., Madeb R. et al. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach//J. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 175, N 3 (Pt. 1). -Р. 945-950.
- Hara I., Kawabata G., Miyake H. et al. Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer//J. Urol. -2003. -Vol. 169, N 6. -Р. 2045-2048.
- Namiki S., Egawa S., Terachi T. et al. Changes in quality of life in first year after radical prostatectomy by retropubic, laparoscopic, and perineal approach: Multi-institutional longitudinal study in Japan//Urology. -2006. -Vol. 67, N 2. -Р. 321-327.
- Медведев В.Л. Сравнительный анализ открытой и лапароскопической радикальной простатэктомии в лечении локального рака предстательной железы: Автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. -М., 2004. -50 с.
- Eden C.G., Cahill D., Vass J.A. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series//BJU Int. -2002. -Vol. 90, N 9. -Р. 876-882.
- Roumeguere T., Bollens R., Vanden Bossche M. et al. Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches//World J. Urol. -2003. -Vol. 20, N 6. -Р. 360-366.
- Miller J., Smith A., Kouba E. et al. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 178, N 3 (Pt. 1). -Р. 854-858.
- Ball A.J., Gambill B., Fabrizio M.D. et al. Prospective longitudinal comparative study of early health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer: a short-term evaluation of five approaches from a single institution//J. Endourol. -2006. -Vol. 20, N 10. -Р. 723-731.
- Frota R., Turna B., Barros R., Gill I.S. Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted//Int. Braz. J. Urol. -2008. -Vol. 34, N 3. -Р. 259-268.
- Patel H.R., Linares A., Joseph J.V. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery: cost and training//Surg. Oncol. -2009. -Vol. 18, N 3. -P. 242-246.
- Klein E.A., Bianco F.J., Serio A.M. et al. Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories//J. Urol. -2008. -Vol. 179, N 6. -Р. 2212-2216.
- Badani K.K., Kaul S., Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures//Cancer. -2007. -Vol. 110, N 9. -Р. 1951-1958.
- Touijer K., Secin F.P., Cronin A.M. et al. Oncologic outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years of experience//Eur. Urol. -2009. -Vol. 55, N 5. -Р. 1014-1019.
- Eastham J., Tokuda Y., Scardino P. Trends in radical prostatectomy//Int. J. Urol. -2009. -Vol. 16, N 2. -P. 151-160.
- Link R.E., Su L.M., Bhayani S.B., Pavlovich C.P. Making ends meet: a cost comparison of laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2004. -Vol. 172, N 1. -P. 269-274.
- Lotan Y., Cadeddu J.A., Gettman M.T. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques//J. Urol. -2004. -Vol. 172, N 4 (Pt. 1). -P. 1431-1435.
- Anderson J.K., Murdock A., Cadeddu J.A., Lotan Y. Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy//Urology. -2005. -Vol. 66, N 3. -P. 557-560.
- Scales C.D. Jr., Jones P.J., Eisenstein E.L. et al. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2005. -Vol. 174, N 6. -P. 2323-2329.
- Mouraviev V., Nosnik I., Sun L., Robertson C.N. et al. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience//Urology. -2007. -Vol. 69, N 32. -P. 311-314.
- Bolenz C., Gupta A., Hotze T., Ho R. et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer//Eur. Urol. -2010. -Vol. 57, N 3. -Р. 453-458.
