A oemparative analysis of various methods of hemostasis in the treatment of neurovascular bundles during nerve-sparing extraperitoneal endovideosurgical radical prostatectomy
Автор: Popov S.V., Orlov I.N., Vyazovtsev P.V., Borisenkov M.B., Sushina I.V., Grin E.A., Gulko A.M.
Журнал: Экспериментальная и клиническая урология @ecuro
Рубрика: Онкоурология
Статья в выпуске: 3, 2018 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The aim of our study was to compare different methods of hemostasis in the treatment of neurovascular bundles during endovideosurgical extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) regarding the risk of developing erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. Materials and methods. The prospective study comprised 35 patients, who underwent nerve-sparing EERPE over the period of 2009-2013. The mean age of patients was 62.2 ± 4.3 years (from 54 to 69 years). The median volume of the prostate was 39 cm3, according to the ultrasonography data (interquartile range [32, 56]). The median level of the total prostate-specific blood antigen was 11.1 ng/ml (interquartile range [8.1, 17.4]). All patients demonstrated complete urinary continence before the surgery and marked the presence of erectile function. All patients were divided into three groups, depending on the method of hemostasis in the treatment of neurovascular bundles during EERPE: Group I - the use of titanium clips (n = 12); Group II - the application of bipolar coagulation (n = 12); III group - the use of an ul trasonic dissector (n = 11)...
Prostate cancer, endovideosurgical extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy, vascular-neural bundle, hemostasis, long-term results, erectile disfunction, urinal retention, biochemical relapse
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/142216883
IDR: 142216883