Strategic university management in the context of digitalization: the experience of the world's leading universities
Автор: Strielkowski Wadim, Korneeva Elena N., Sherstobitova Anna A., Platitzyn Alexandr Yu.
Журнал: Интеграция образования @edumag-mrsu
Рубрика: Международный опыт интеграции образования
Статья в выпуске: 3 (108), 2022 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Introduction. The research paper's aim is to study the ongoing digitalization in all spheres of economy, which inevitably impacted on the strategic university management. It explains how universities and higher educational institutions strategically positioned themselves and searched for the novel pathways for innovation and development, which was further reinforced by the COVID-19 pandemic and the digital surge it brought. Materials and Methods. The authors analyzed the strategic university management in the context of digitalization using the literature review and their own analysis. They focus on the experience of the world's best universities for inspiring the institutions of higher education in other countries and regions, helping them to improve information and communication technologies and digital skills. Results. Our results corroborate the ongoing digitalization in all spheres of economy and social life which was pushed further by the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to the transformation of the higher educational institutions challenging them to embark upon the path of in-depth transition, restructuring, and re-thinking their role and their mission with regard to the new challenges and novel technologies that are available on the market. Discussion and Conclusion. The outcomes present interesting possibilities for their application in practice for some countries, most notably Russia. They can be of a special interest not only for the government officials responsible for fostering higher education and devising guidelines for the strategic management of universities and higher educational institutions, but also for the academic environment with its researchers and lecturers who seek to innovate based on the most recent and advanced trends in higher education (e.g. ministries and national authorities responsible for science, research, and education in different countries, such as the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Ministry of National Education, Ministry for Research, as well as National Educational Authority or the World Bank, just to name a few).
Universities, digitalization, higher education, strategic management, information systems
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238968
IDR: 147238968 | DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.108.026.202203.402-417
Текст научной статьи Strategic university management in the context of digitalization: the experience of the world's leading universities
Today, at the era of digitalization and digital transformation, many universities and other higher educational institutions (HEIs)
face the necessity to rethink their role and mission as well as to adapt to the new conditions on the educational market [1–3]. Some universities and HEIs employ the

university-wide strategy plans that provide a detailed description of how campus-wide interviews, listening tours, and contributions to plan development can contribute to transparency and engagement. For example, the university of Bergen in Norway complements the general university strategy in its university-wide digital strategy in its decision-making and entrepreneurial needs, and defines digitalization as more than just digital tools, it is about changing our culture and how people and companies conduct business1. In the United Kingdom, the digital strategy of many leading universities (e.g. Russel Group universities, an association similar to the Ivy League in the United States) is a stand-alone strategy that complements the universityʼs overall strategic plan. The digital strategy highlights the universityʼs mission and highlights a list of other sectoral strategies that collectively deliver the universityʼs vision. The strategy also includes a list of the key performance indicators that show how successful success is for all stakeholders within the university, from students to decision makers2.
Figure 1 that is depicted below demonstrates the place and the role of the University 4.0 in the era of digitalization and ICT. The Figure clearly explains how the modernday university (which is being generally called “University 4.0”) draws heavily from and depends upon traditional and renewable energy sources, how it cooperates with people and promotes innovative ideas and projects that might include smart technologies as well as various novel applications and devices.
The COVID-19 crisis (2020–2022) demonstrated that leaders in academia and education can derive the lessons learned from the recent events in order to increase the resilience of their respective institutions for the years to come. The data from the online learning and home office can be used for fine-tuning and improving online education tools and approaches for further use in order to test the future of higher education models [8]. University leaders must not overuse their time fighting fires now and forget about the long-term perspective.
For quite some time, managers and leaders in higher education are trying to master their skills in strategic management.

F i g. 1. University 4.0 in the era of digitalization and ICT: links and collaborations Source : Own results.
Even though all managerial skills seem to be similar and uniform across all fields of economy for the majority of people, the complexity and nature of the problems that university managers face in their daily lives are quite different from those tackled by the business companies [9; 10]. There are many learning opportunities that go far beyond what the private sector has learned about university governance. To build sustainable and effective organizations, science and business leaders must look at the current landscape, question assumptions and think differently in order to build sustainable and effective organizations. The results of a powerful institutional strategy are alignment of resource allocation, facilitation of strategic objectives, clear and transparent decision-making, development of new programs, the growth of research capacities and infrastructure investment [11].
It appears that the Fourth Industrial Revolution had an overall profound impact on the digitalization of universities. The digital epoch in history created by the Fourth Industrial Revolution required a transformation of the university system in order to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the digital revolution [12]. One observation about the future that science-fiction writer William Gibson attributed to is that the digital transformation (DX) itself is not evenly distributed [13]. The dominant style of leadership at universities is that the goals of behavior change, expression, freedom of speech, knowledge acquisition, distribution, exchange and reward should lead to trust building between academics and student. Academic learning and teaching leads to creativity, problem-solving and innovation and that staff have enough skills to enable the university to succeed in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Two widespread shifts in the workforce towards shared services and peer-to-peer approaches are changing the nature and the ways employees work and reducing the effective use of resources. Applications and services are to be redesigned taking into account the student experience. These changes need to be discussed and redefined in the context of the Top 10 educational issues of the post-pandemic era [14].
In general terms, institutions of higher education are trying to offer combined and interconnected solutions, such as various learning management systems (LMS) that can facilitate student connections and participation in academic life. Institutional leaders are building massive data repositories in real time to support the data needed for student success initiatives. This is how
relationship management is used to offer the students top-notch experience all throughout their university paths from the secondary school to graduation [15]. As the industry advances, the increasing specialization and complexity of the data science skills, tools and services prompts HEIs to offer training opportunities so that our community members can take full advantage of these new and emerging capabilities. While some universities offer credit courses on aspects of modern information technology to all of our registered students, these courses remain inaccessible to a large portion of our community. Increasing the efforts to provide the faculty, staff, and students with specialized IT training and general IT training opportunities as a form of continuing education in IT are the efforts higher education requires. This novel approach to education is revolutionizing student experience by providing marketing, enrollment and retention services for colleges (i.e. tertiary educational institutions), universities and other HEIs that are focused on the success of their students. HEIs might lag behind many of their counterparts in the effort to use institutional data to improve their educational outcomes and operational efficiencies [16; 17].
Thence, today universities and HEIs need to position themselves as leaders in supporting innovation by supporting the appropriate use of new data collection technologies. This change took longer than usual. For example, universities and HEIs need to foster their usage of online tuition and resources that might include online rating or psychological counselling. In general, there has been a huge increase in the workload in learning how to use new technologies and in processing student requests, expecting them to do the same thing that killed off research [18]. The summer semester of 2021, during which many HEIs were able to gather research results and had time to think about ways to improve their current offerings, should be dominated by the redesign of modules accessible for online teaching and assessment and completion of the formalities necessary to support change ‒ not enough time to ensure a coherent and balanced approach throughout the course.
Список литературы Strategic university management in the context of digitalization: the experience of the world's leading universities
- Saykili A. Higher Education in the Digital Age: The Impact of Digital Connective Technologies. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning. 2019;2(1):1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.516971
- Rodriguez-Abitia G., Bribiesca-Correa G. Assessing Digital Transformation in Universities. Future Internet. 2021;13(2):52. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13020052
- Strielkowski W., Volchik V., Maskaev A., Savko P. Leadership and Effective Institutional Economics Design in the Context of Education Reforms. Economies. 2020;8(2):27. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ economies8020027
- Miller P. 'Culture', 'Context', School Leadership and Entrepreneurialism: Evidence from Sixteen Countries. Education Sciences. 2018;8(2):76. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020076
- Rafiq M., Batool S.H., Ali A.F., Ullah M. University Libraries Response to COVID-19 Pandemic: A Developing Country Perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2021;47(1):102280. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102280
- Mirata V., Hirt F., Bergamin P., Van der Westhuizen C. Challenges and Contexts in Establishing Adaptive Learning in Higher Education: Findings from a Delphi Study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2020;17:32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00209-y
- Tarasova A., Korneeva E., Krayneva R., Gudkova S. Pitfalls and Drawbacks in Engineering Education in Russia. Journal of Applied Engineering Science. 2019;17(1):43-51. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.5937/jaes17-19097
- Azorin C. Beyond COVID-19 Supernova, Is Another Education Coming? Journal of Professional Capital and Community. 2020;5(3/4):381-390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0019
- Klofsten M., Fayolle A., Guerrero M., Mian S., Urbano D., Wright M. The Entrepreneurial University as Driver for Economic Growth and Social Change-Key Strategic Challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019;141:149-158. doi: https://doi.org/10.10167j.techfore.2018.12.004
- Succi C., Canovi M. Soft Skills to Enhance Graduate Employability: Comparing Students and Employers' Perceptions. Studies in Higher Education. 2020;45(9):1834-1847. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1585420
- Miotto G., Del-Castillo-Feito C., Blanco-González A. Reputation and Legitimacy: Key Factors for Higher Education Institutions' Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Business Research. 2020;112:342-353. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jjbusres.2019.11.076
- Schi0lin K. Revolutionary Dreams: Future Essentialism and the Sociotechnical Imaginary of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in Denmark. Social Studies of Science. 2020;50(4):542-566. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0306312719867768
- Grajek S. Digital Transformation and the Post-COVID-19 Institution. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. 2021;53(4):29-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2021.1930979
- Rapanta C., Botturi L., Goodyear P., Guárdia L., Koole M. Balancing Technology, Pedagogy and the New Normal: Post-Pandemic Challenges for Higher Education. Postdigital Science and Education. 2021;3:715-742. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1
- Bauman A., Lucy C. Enhancing Entrepreneurial Education: Developing Competencies for Success. The International Journal of Management Education. 2021;19(1):100293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/). ijme.2019.03.005
- Johnson N., Veletsianos G., Seaman J. US Faculty and Administrators' Experiences and Approaches in the Early Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online Learning. 2020;24(2):6-21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/ olj.v24i2.2285
- Leal Filho W., Raath S., Lazzarini B., Vargas V.R., De Souza L., Anholon R., et al. The Role of Transformation in Learning and Education for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;199:286-295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2018.07.017
- Polly D., Martin F., Guilbaud T.C. Examining Barriers and Desired Supports to Increase Faculty Members' Use of Digital Technologies: Perspectives of Faculty, Staff and Administrators. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2021;33:135-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09259-7
- Hynes W., Trump B., Love P., Linkov I. Bouncing Forward: A Resilience Approach to Dealing with COVID-19 and Future Systemic Shocks. Environment Systems and Decisions. 2020;40(2):174-184. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247742/ (accessed 20.01.2022).
- Komninos N., Kakderi C., Collado A., Papadaki I., Panori A. Digital Transformation of City Ecosystems: Platforms Shaping Engagement and Externalities across Vertical Markets. Journal of Urban Technology. 2021;28(1-2):93-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1805712
- George G., Howard-Grenville J., Joshi A., Tihanyi L. Understanding and Tackling Societal Grand Challenges Through Management Research. Academy of Management Journal. 2016;59(6):1880-1895. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4007
- Lu J., Ren L., Qiao J., Yao S., Strielkowski W., Streimikis J. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corruption: Implications for the Sustainable Energy Sector. Sustainability. 2019;11(15):4128. doi: https://doi. org/10.3390/su11154128
- Banerjee S., Bhardwaj P. Aligning Marketing and Sales in Multi-Channel Marketing: Compensation Design for Online Lead Generation and Offline Sales Conversion. Journal of Business Research. 2019;105:293-305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjbusres.2019.06.016
- Caruso L. Digital Innovation and the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Epochal Social Changes? AI & Society. 2018;33:379-392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0736-1
- Henderson M., Selwyn N., Aston R. What Works and Why? Student Perceptions of 'Useful' Digital Technology in University Teaching and Learning. Studies in Higher Education. 2017;42(8):1567-1579. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946 (accessed 20.01.2022).
- Sadeghi M. A Shift from Classroom to Distance Learning: Advantages and Limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education. 2019;4(1):80-88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/ijree.4.1.80
- Impey C., Formanek M. MOOCS and 100 Days of COVID: Enrollment Surges in Massive Open Online Astronomy Classes during the Coronavirus Pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2021;4(1):100177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.ssaho.2021.100177
- García-Peñalvo F.J. Avoiding the Dark Side of Digital Transformation in Teaching. An Institutional Reference Framework for Elearning in Higher Education. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):2023. doi: https://doi. org/10.3390/su13042023
- Burton-Jones A., Akhlaghpour S., Ayre S., Barde P., Staib A., Sullivan C. Changing the Conversation on Evaluating Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Insights from an Institutional Analysis. Information and Organization. 2020;30(1):100255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100255
- García-Morales V.J., Garrido-Moreno A., Martín-Rojas R. The Transformation of Higher Education after the COVID Disruption: Emerging Challenges in an Online Learning Scenario. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:616059. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
- Ali W. Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A Necessity in Light of COVID-19 Pandemic. Higher Education Studies. 2020;10(3):16-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16
- Idnani D. Pandemic, Policy, and Pedagogy: Analyzing the Tripartite Role of COVID 19 Pandemic, National Education Policy 2020, and Pedagogical Innovations Vis-A-Vis Educational Implications. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI). 2021;4(3):123-128. doi: https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i3.121
- Rof A., Bikfalvi A., Marqués P. Digital Transformation for Business Model Innovation in Higher Education: Overcoming the Tensions. Sustainability. 2020;12(12):4980. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124980
- Pucciarelli F., Kaplan A. Competition and Strategy in Higher Education: Managing Complexity and Uncertainty. Business Horizons. 2016;59(3):311-320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.003
- Ellis V., Steadman S., Mao Q. 'Come to a Screeching Halt': Can Change in Teacher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic Be Seen as Innovation? European Journal of Teacher Education. 2020;43(4):559-572. Available at: https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/come-to-a-screeching-halt-can-change-in-teacher-education-during- (accessed 20.01.2022).