Substantiation of a compliance control of socially significant organisations on the institutional theory basis
Автор: Yakimova Vilena A.
Журнал: Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: Экономика @economics-psu
Рубрика: Экономическая теория
Статья в выпуске: 4 т.12, 2017 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The issues concerning public welfare and sustainable growth that is possible when economic agents behave conscientiously are currently significant. The main purpose of the present study is to substantiate economically the role and the main points of a compliance control as an institute which aim is to reduce stakeholder's risks and to provide a sustainable growth of socially significant organisations that make a national economy function efficiently. The research is based on a theoretical methodological apparatus of an institutional economic theory, a risk-oriented approach, methods of analysis, systematization and generalization. The novelty of the study is a different view on the concept “a compliance control institute of socially significant organisations” that allows us to estimate the consequences of the low breaking by socially significant organisations that occur in the form of costs growth and risks of agents who are interested in a sustainable and conscientious transaction. The trends and types of the compliance control have been determined. These trends consider a social and economic role of organisations that are being controlled and areas where compliance risks arise. Considering the features of socially significant organisations and their classification we have characterised institutional relations, determined possible conflicts of interest and compliance risks, distinguished the functions of the compliance control institute, revealed the role of an institutional structure of the compliance at three levels (internal, external and public). We have also discovered factors that prevent efficient functioning of the institution. In our research we have proven that the institute of a compliance control is significant to reduce opportunistic behaviour risks that threaten sustainable development of socially significant organisations and their stakeholders. The efficient development of the compliance institute is connected to the need of the state and society to assist in the implementation of functions and mechanism of the enforcement to internal audit and internal control by socially significant organisations. The assessment of the control procedure quality by the socially significant organisations and their opposition to legislation violation risks are also important for the compliance control institute. Further studies will be devoted to the construction of a hierarchy of the compliance control institution with a clear division of control tasks at internal and external levels. Also a set of solutions to increase the efficiency of the implementation of the compliance control functionality will be made.
Compliance control, institution of a compliance control, stakeholders, socially significant organizations, compliance risks, transaction costs, efficiency, subjects of transactions, dysfunction of the institution
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147201601
IDR: 147201601 | DOI: 10.17072/1994-9960-2017-4-542-560
Список литературы Substantiation of a compliance control of socially significant organisations on the institutional theory basis
- Valiev V.Kh. Komplaens-funktsiya v sovremennykh predpriyatiyakh pridorozhnogo servisa, kak odin iz effektivnykh metodov upravleniya riskami . Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya , 2015, no. 2-2, pp. 390-399.
- Silakova V.V. Komplaens v sisteme risk-menedzhmenta nepreryvnykh proizvodstv . Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya , 2015, no. 9, pp. 96-104.
- Starinov G.P., Tseveleva I.V. Komplaens-programma v sisteme upravleniya deliktnymi riskami predpriyatiya . Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta , 2016, no. 3 (40), pp. 115-119.
- North D.C. Institutions, transaction costs, and the rise of merchant empires. In book: The political economy of merchant empires. Ed. by J. Tracy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991. рp. 161-195
- Kleiner G.B. Evolyutsiya institutsional'nykh sistem . Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2004. 240 p.
- Hodgson G.M. The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 1998, vol. 36, iss. 1, pр. 166-192
- Itygilova E.Yu. Institutsional'nye aspekty audita bukhgalterskoi finansovoi otchetnosti . Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet , 2015, no. 29 (371), pp. 29-49.
- Institutsional'nye aspekty bukhgalterskogo ucheta i kontrolya . Ed. by V.V. Pankov, V.I. Perov. Moscow, GOU VPO "REA imeni G.V. Plekhanova" Publ., 2009, 428 р.
- Baranov P.P. Ugroza utraty institutsional'nogo statusa auditorskoi deyatel'nosti v usloviyakh stagnatsii teorii audita . Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola , 2012, no. 6 (95), pp. 144-150.
- Zhukov V.N. Ekonomicheskie teorii, opredelyayushchie kontury razvitiya vnutrennego finansovogo kontrolya . Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya , 2014, no. 42 (228), pp. 36-47.
- Commons J.R. Institutsional'naya ekonomika. Per. s angl. A.A. Oganesyan. Nauch. red. V.M Efimov. . Terra Economicus , 2012, no. 3. pp. 69-76
- Williamson O.E. Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma. Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaya» kontraktatsiya. Per. s angl. . St. Petersburg, Lenizdat Publ., 1996. 702 р.
- Alchian A., Demsets G. Proizvodstvo, informatsionnye izderzhki i ekonomicheskaya organizatsiya . In book: Istoki: ekonomika v kontekste istorii i kul'tury. Vypusk 5 . Мoscow, GU -VShE Publ., 2004, pp. 166-207.
- Eggertsson T. Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999. 385 p.
- Furubotn E.G., Richter R. The new institutional economics: An assessment. In book: The New Institutional Economics. Intr. and ed. by E.G. Furubotn, R. Richter. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, 1991, pp. 1-32
- Shastitko A.E. Novaya institutsional'naya ekonomicheskaya teoriya. 4-e izd. . Мoscow, TEIS Publ., 2010. 827 р.
- Coase R.H. Priroda firmy . Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli. T. 2. Teoriya firmy , 1999, vol. 2, pp. 11-32.
- Freeman R.E., Martin K., Parmar B. Stakeholder Capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 2007, vol. 74, iss. 4, pp. 303-314
- Jensen М.С., Meckling W.H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, vol. 3, iss. 4, pp. 305-360
- Institutsional'nye ogranicheniya ekonomicheskoi dinamiki . Scien. ed. V.L. Tambovtsev. Moscow, TEIS Publ., 2009. 524 p.
- Sukharev O.S. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya institutsional'nogo modelirovaniya: printsipy i vozmozhnosti . Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii , 2017, no. 1, pp. 102-116.
- Sotnikova L.V. Audit obshchestvenno znachimykh khozyaistvuyushchikh sub"ektov . Auditorskie vedomosti , 2008, no. 6, pp. 45-52
- Galbraith J.K. Ekonomicheskie teorii i tseli obshchestva . Мoscow, Progress Publ., 1979. 406 p.
- Phillips R. Some key questions about stakeholder theory. Reprint № 9B04TB03. Ivey Business Journal, 2004, March/April, pp. 1-4. Available at: https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/some-key-questions-about-stakeholder-theory/(accessed 05.08.2017)
- Veblen T. The theory of leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York, B.W.Huebsh Publ., 1899. 412 р
- Dement'ev V.V. Chto my issleduem, kogda issleduem instituty? . Ekonomicheskaya teoriya , 2009, vol. 6, no. 3 (3-2009), pp. 75-93.