Essence of evidence assessment in arbitration procedure

This article will consider the problem of assessing evidence by persons participating in the arbitration process. Evaluation of evidence is entrusted mainly to the Arbitration Court, represented by a judge, or a panel of judges according to their inner conviction, as well as the study of each evidence in the proceedings. The judge expresses the assessment of evidence in the reasons for accepting or refusing to accept the evidence, which are provided by the persons participating in the arbitration dispute, substantiating their claims and objections. The arbitration court determines the relationship and sufficiency of all evidence in general and the compliance of the information with reality. Also, the assessment of evidence is assigned to the persons participating in the case. The lack of a theoretical and methodological basis for assessing evidence leads to judicial errors, which directly affects the objectivity and quality of the court decision.