Technological sovereignty projects as a tool for innovative development of the Russian economy
Автор: Lenchuk E.B., Filatov V.I.
Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en
Рубрика: Scientific, technological and innovation development
Статья в выпуске: 3 т.17, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Currently, in the new geopolitical context and amid external restrictions imposed by the West, the achievement of technological sovereignty is becoming the most important feature of a new emerging development model for Russia. In this regard, there is a need to find new and most effective ways and tools to address this problem. Our work considers the issue of implementing the project approach and the transition to a full innovation cycle economy through the formation of technological sovereignty projects that are pointed out as the main tool for ensuring technological independence as stated in the Concept for Technological Development of the Russian Federation up to 2030. Special attention is paid to the development of scientific and methodological approaches to the formation of such a tool in the context of analyzing the existing accumulated experience in the implementation of projects of a full innovation cycle, primarily comprehensive scientific and technological programs and projects implemented in the light of the objectives contained in the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation adopted in 2016. We point out the importance of defining the boundaries of the full innovation cycle, which is interpreted by researchers in different ways. Since technological sovereignty projects are designed to turn into a tool for building their own reproduction chains, they should not end with the introduction of new technology; rather, they should enter mass production and contain a detailed investment component for the creation and reconstruction of production facilities. In this regard, we analyze the procedure for selecting priority areas for the development of technological sovereignty projects and their resource provision; we assess the effectiveness of state tools for supporting such projects; and propose measures to improve the organization of the process of formation and implementation of technological sovereignty projects. The implementation of the package of measures we put forward should help accelerate scientific and technological development and reduce Russia’s technological dependence.
Technological sovereignty, full innovation cycle, innovative development model, national innovation system, critical and end-to-end technologies, integrated scientific and technological programs, technological sovereignty projects
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147245858
IDR: 147245858 | DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.3.93.4
Список литературы Technological sovereignty projects as a tool for innovative development of the Russian economy
- Aganbegyan A.G. (2022). Making no headway. Natsional'nyi bankovskii zhurnal, 9, 6–9 (in Russian).
- Belousov D.R. (2023). Global technological trends of 2022–2040. Gorizont 2040=Horizon 2040, 88–157. Available at: https://files-ice.asi.ru/iblock/165/1651b72732529007ed6831769707d3f7/Block_Gorizont_web_p_0208.pdf (accessed: January 20, 2024; in Russian).
- Freeman C. (Ed.). (1996). Long Wave Theory. Cambridge, UK: The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics.
- Golichenko O.G. (2006). Natsional'naya innovatsionnaya sistema Rossii: sostoyanie i puti razvitiya [National Innovation System of Russia: Current State and Ways of Development]. Moscow: Nauka. Available at: https://new.ras.ru/upload/uf/cc5/w4i817fegw3kxoj1moze0ffoqstv1oro.pdf (accessed: January 20, 2024).
- Groot B., Franses P. (2005). Cycles in Basic Innovations. Econometric Institute Report 2005-35. Rotterdam. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/18507942.pdf
- Khairullin R.A. (2011). Stages of the innovation process. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya, 12, 809–813 (in Russian).
- Khlebnikov K.V. (2016). Parameters of the innovation cycle of a high-tech enterprise: Stages, cost, duration, personnel. Ekonomicheskie nauki=Economic Sciences, 10(143), 23–27 (in Russian).
- Klepach A.N. (2023). Ekonomika nauki i tekhnologicheskii suverenitet [The Economics of Science and Technological Sovereignty]. Available at: https://inveb-docs.ru/attachments/article/2023_12/Ekonomika_znaniy.pdf (accessed: February 22, 2024).
- Lenchuk E.B. (2023). The main contours of the Russian scientific and technological policy within external constraints. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii=Economic Revival of Russia, 3, 16–24. DOI: 10.37930|1990-9780-2023-3-77-16-24 (in Russian).
- Nikolaev I.A. (2023). Technological sovereignty projects: Opportunities and limitations. Mir peremen, 4, 26–39. DOI: 10.51905/2073-3038_2023_4_26 (in Russian).
- Perez C. (2002). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of 26 Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Shepelev G.V., Mironov N.A., Sergeev M.V., Sergeev I.M. (2021). CSTP: Lessons from the implementation of the first stage and future prospects. Innovatika i ekspertiza, 2(32), 101–120. DOI: 10.35264/1996-2274-2021-2-101-120 (in Russian).
- Simachev Yu.V., Kuzyk M.G. (2021). Interaction of Russian business with science: Points of contact and stumbling blocks. Voprosy ekonomiki, 6, 103–138. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-6-103-138 (in Russian).
- Sokolov A.B., Filatov V.I. (2023). New instruments for investment support of technology sovereignty projects. Mir novoi ekonomiki=The World of New Economy, 17(3), 91–108. DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2023-17-3-91-108 (in Russian).
- Vasetskaya N.O. (2020) The analysis of approaches to defining the innovation cycle from the point of view of obtaining a macroeconomic result. Vektor nauki TGU. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie=Science Vector of Togliatti State University. Series: Economics and Management, 3 18–23. DOI: 10.18323/2221-5689-2020-3-18-23 (in Russian).
- Vasetskaya N.O., Fedotov A.V. (2020). Analysis of problems in implementing and evaluating the effectiveness of scientific and technical programs of the full innovation cycle. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Ekonomika”, 18(3), 5–16. DOI: 10.24147/1812-3988.2020.18(3).5-16 (in Russian).
- Yurevich M.A. (2023). Technological sovereignty of Russia: Concept, measurement, and possibility of achievement. VTE, 4, 19. DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_4_7_21 (in Russian).