Testing Herzberg's two factor theory on millennials

Автор: Bhatt N., Chitranshi J., Mehta M.

Журнал: Cardiometry @cardiometry

Рубрика: Original research

Статья в выпуске: 22, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

This study tests Herzberg’s two-factor theory of motivation on working millennials. The purpose of the study is to evaluate what the assumptions and the findings of the original study hold for millennials. With the increasing trend of amalgamation of work life and personal life, job satisfaction and general job happiness have never been more on an individual’s personal life. This impact is far-reaching, with strong indications of affecting the employees’ physical, mental, and social health. In such a scenario, organizations need to keep their employees motivated and satisfied. For studying Herzberg’s two-factor theory of motivation on working millennials, we have selected respondents with work experience of at least one year. We have not restricted the study to any particular industry; hence our sample is across all industries. The type of sampling used was convenient sampling. From the analysis, we have found that for the concerned sample, hygiene factors tower above the motivating factors in terms of job satisfaction for millennials. From the data collection and analysis, we proved that both motivators and hygiene factors affect job satisfaction, unlike what has been said by Herzberg. This study will contribute to the exciting literature on motivation.

Еще

Herzberg's motivation-hygiene, job satisfaction, motivation, millennials, social health

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148324600

IDR: 148324600   |   DOI: 10.18137/cardiometry.2022.22.231236

Список литературы Testing Herzberg's two factor theory on millennials

  • E. T. Albert, AI in talent acquisition: a review of applications used in recruitment and selection. Strategic HR Review, 18(5), 215–221, (2019).
  • P. M. Arsenault, Validating generational differences: A legitimate diversity and leadership issue. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25(2), 124-141, (2004).
  • Birkman, (2016). https://birkman.com. [Online] Available at: https://birkman.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Generational-DifferencesPDF.pdf
  • G. D. Buckner, V. Shah, Future Vision: Impacts on Organizational Success. Kybernetes, 22(2), 40–50, (1993).
  • C. Cran, 101 ways to make generations X, Y, and Zoomers happy at work. Cheryl Cran, (2010).
  • M. I. Finney, Myi Library, Building high-performance people and organizations. Westport, Conn: Praeger (2008).
  • P, K. H. Blanchard, Management of organizational behavior: utilizing the human resource. Atlanta: Prentice- Hall, (1988).
  • A. A. Khan, N. Abbas, K. A. Zaki, Effect of Incentives Based Two Factor Theory on Employee Performance in Telecom. The Nucleus, 54(3), 173-180, (2017).
  • U. Lichtenthaler, Beyond artificial intelligence: why companies need to go the extra step. Journal of Business Strategy (2018).
  • A. Maslow, Motivation and personality, New York: McGraw Hill (1954).
  • F. Michalek, M. Long, Cohabitation with Millennials in the Workplace: A contemporary challenge of Leadership (2013).
  • D. C. McClelland, The achieving society, Princeton: Van Norstrand (1961).
  • A. R. McIlvaine, is HR ready? (2019). Retrieved from https://hrexecutive.com/ai-is-coming-but-is-hrready/
  • S. P. Robbins, Organizational behavior, 9th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, (2001).
  • S. Schulze, T. Steyn, Educators’ motivation: Differences related to gender, age, and experience. Acta Academica, 35(3), 138–160, (2003).
  • M. E. Sempane, Job satisfaction about organizational culture. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28, 23-30, (2002)
  • V. H. Vroom, Work and motivation, New York: John Wiley (1964).
  • T. Weaver, Theory M: motivating with money. Cornell HRA Quarterly, 29(3), 40-45, (1988).
Еще
Статья научная