The Babylonian exile of the Judaeans and the formation of the doctrine of the bodily resurrection from the dead: from the naturalistic allegory of the collective revival of the Jews upon their expected return to Judaea through the personified image of the people's rising from the dead to the concept of an individual eschatological resurrection in the flesh

Бесплатный доступ

The author reveals the following sequence in the formation of the Jewish doctrine of the bodily resurrection of the dead: during the Babylonian captivity of the Judaeans, a naturalistic allegory of their revival upon their expected return to their Motherland arises (Ezek. 37:1-14, Isa. 26:19, 41:14); by the end of the period of exile / at the very beginning of the Persian period, the personified image of the people’s rising from the dead is developing (the allegory of the Servant of the Lord in Isa. 42:1-9, 49: 1-7, 50:4-9, 52:13-53:12; perhaps also the image of Job, cf. especially: Job 19:25-27a and 42:5, 7-17). In the time of another national catastrophe - the persecution of the faithful Jews under Antiochus IV Epiphanes - the concept of an individual eschatological resurrection in the flesh arises; at this receiving of the afterlife requital is assumed to be realized in the body (Dan. 12:1b-3, 13).

Еще

Formation of the doctrine of the bodily resurrection, eschatology, babylonian exile of the judaeans, the concept of an individual eschatological resurrection in the flesh, the servant of the lord, books of isaiah, ezekiel, job, daniel

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147215866

IDR: 147215866

Текст научной статьи The Babylonian exile of the Judaeans and the formation of the doctrine of the bodily resurrection from the dead: from the naturalistic allegory of the collective revival of the Jews upon their expected return to Judaea through the personified image of the people's rising from the dead to the concept of an individual eschatological resurrection in the flesh

* This research was carried out thanks to the funding of the Russian Science Foundation (project №15-18-00062; Saint-Petersburg State University).

ΣΧΟΛΗ Vol. 14. 1 (2020)

I

The Book of the Judaean prophet Isaiah 26:19 contains an allegory of the revival of the Jews in their native land after the Lord “punishes the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquities”1:

Thy dead will come back to life, the dead bodies of my (people)2 will rise!3

Wake up and rejoice you, dwelling in the dust, for Thy dew (will be) the dew of the (reviving) light4, and the earth will give birth5 to her dead.6

Although part of the Book of Isaiah, chapters 24–27 (conditionally called “Prophetic Announcement of the Lord’s New World Order: Prophesy of the Salvation for Zion / Israel”7), was included in the prophecies of Proto-Isaiah (second half of the eighth century B.C.E.), however many researchers date it now to the period of the Babylonian exile of the Jews (after the fall of Jerusalem in 586 B.C.E.) or even to the very beginning of Persian dominion in Judaea.8

The prophet Ezekiel, who lived among the Jewish exiles in the first decades of the Babylonian captivity (the first third of the sixth century B.C.E.)9, in one of his prophecies creates a naturalistic image of the people of Israel rising from the dead in exile, whom the Lord God eventually brings home, to the Land of Israel ( Ezek . 37: 1–14). In particular, the prophet says about the "dry bones" of the Israel-ites/Judahites scattered on the field in a foreign land as follows:

  • <…> and now, shuddered (the earth), and the bones came together, bone to bone.

And as I looked, they were covered with sinews; flesh was growing on them and skin was covering them, (yet) there was no spirit10 in them. <…>

And He said to me, «Prophesy to the Spirit; prophesy, son of man. Say to the Spirit, “The Lord God says this: ‘Come from the four winds, O Spirit; breathe on these dead, so that they come to life!’ ”».

I prophesied as he had ordered me, and the spirit entered them; they came to life and stood up on their feet, a great, an immense army.

Then He said, «Son of man, these bones are the whole House of Israel. (They) keep saying, “Our bones are dry, our hope has gone; we are done for”.

So, prophesy, and say to them, “The Lord God says this: ‘I am now going to open your graves; I shall raise you from your graves, My people, and lead you back to the soil of Israel’ ”» ( Ezek . 37: 7b–12).

The image of the resurrection to the life of the seemingly lost people of Israel acquires particular relevance in Isa ., chap. 40–55, in the so-called Deutero-Isaiah, whose core of prophecies is usually dated to the time close to the very end of the Babylonian captivity of the Jews and their return to their homeland (probably the 540s – about 539 B.C.E.).11 Thus, in Isa . 41:14 we read:

“Fear not, you worm of Jacob12, you the dead13 of Israel (mty yśrʼl)14!

I will help you”, says the Lord.

“I am your Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel”.

Deutero-Isaiah also personifies the image of the people of Israel in his allegory of the Servant of the Lord (see the so-called Songs of the Servant of the Lord in Isa . 42:1–9, 49:1–7, 50:4–9, 52:13–53:12), suffering and, as it seemed to others, practically ceased to exist in Babylonian exile. However, the prophet is confident that as a result, the Lord will raise His Servant and, returning him to his homeland, will exalt among the nations. This idea is especially distinctly expressed in Isa . 53:8b–9, 11–12:

  • <…> He was cut off from the land of the living;

for the sin of My people He was stricken.

he was given a grave with the wicked, and his 15 is with the rich16;

although he had done no violence, had spoken no deceit. <…>

After the ordeal he has endured, he will see 17 and be content.

“By his knowledge, the upright one, My servant will justify many by taking their guilt on himself.

Hence I shall give him (a portion) with the many, and he will share the booty with the mighty, for having exposed himself to death and for being counted as one of the transgressors;

whereas he was bearing the sin18 of many and interceding for the transgressors.

It is also likely that the righteous man of ancient antiquity, the servant of the Lord Job19 (see: Job. 42:7–8), personifies the Jewish people in the Babylonian captivity in the Biblical book of the same name20: the author of this work, as the reader can understand, correlates the misfortunes of pious and wealthy Job, sincerely worshiping God, with the fate of the Judaeans who carried out religious reform in ca . 621 B.C.E., which resulted in the establishment of a single centralized Divine service in the Temple of Jerusalem, cleansed of any pagan elements, but lost their Motherland and found themselves in the Babylonian exile on the verge of national death. At the same time, the descriptions of Job’s loss of livestock (broadly – property), servants, children, and finally his deadly disease – all this "by hand" of figure, designated in the book as haś-śāṭān , lit. “enemy, adversary, rival, etc.”, the reader could correlate with the successive invasions of the

Babylonians to Judaea (since 605 B.C.E.), the plunder and devastation of the country, the treasures of the Temple and the royal palace, the removal of prisoners and, finally, the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple of the Lord in 586 B.C.E.

However, like the Servant of the Lord in the Book of Isaiah, the servant of the Lord Job was also regenerated by God to life; he found new children and property, his relatives returned to him. In this connection it is significant that the turn šāḇ ʾeṯ šĕḇîṯ (lit. “to return captivity (captives)”) attested in the final part of the book ( Job 42:10a) describing the final restoration of Job and his rebirth by the Lord to a new life, was used by the prophets, who lived at the beginning of the Babylonian captivity (see: Jer . 29:14, 30:3, Ezek . 16:53, 39:25 ; this phrase is also present in Deut . 30:3) and proclaimed the final return of the exiles to their homeland.21

The innocent sufferer Job, being on the verge of death and complaining about his fate, declares an unjust arrangement of the world where, in his opinion, the righteous suffer, and the wicked are prosperous and dominate. At the same time, behind the coffin, there seems to be no hope as well, for the transition of the human spirit to Sheol (the underground abode of the deceased) turns out, according to the widely spread opinion known to Job, to be tantamount to practically total non-being.

But God “opens” people’s “ear in oppression” ( Job 36:15b; cf.: Isa . 50:4b–5), that is, “sensitivity” to intuitive knowledge in existential situations; and here Job comes to his main conclusion, which he would like to not simply write down in the scroll, but suggests to “cut into the rock22 with iron chisel and engraving tool for ever”, so that it is available to all generations:

I know (that) my Redeemer lives,

And (at) last (wĕʾaḥărôn) He shall stand over the ashes23, after my skin is destroyed;

however , from my flesh I shall see God ( ûmibbśārî ʾeḥĕzeh ʾĕlôah )24,

I shall see (Him) by myself,

My eyes shall behold – (I myself), and not another ( Job 19:25–27a).

Moreover, God gives to Job, who is on the verge of death, in fact already in a liminal situation, an opportunity to look at the world created by Him from the moment of its formation – and not from the point of view of man, but from the point of view of the Creator Himself. This Revelation contains, as the reader can conclude, the essence of God’s answer to Job who was inquiring of Him. Job himself characterizes the Divine Revelation that he received as follows:

I have heard of Thee only by the hearing of the ear;

But now my eye sees Thee! ( Job 42:5).

After Job acquired this higher Knowledge, he was reborn by the Lord, in fact, he found a new life. It was this miraculous restoration of Job in the flesh that was rendered in Job 42:10a by the turn sab ’et sebit, meaning literally: ‘’to return captivity (captives)’’. The Lord doubled Job’s inheritance, his relatives and friends returned to him, and he again found children and offspring ( Job 42:10b–16). This all could be interpreted by the reader of the Book of Job as an allegory of the revival of the Jews in their homeland after the Babylonian exile and the construction of a new Temple of the Lord YHWH by them in Jerusalem.25

It is significant that the Tetragrammaton YHWH, the Name of God26 revealed by Him to His people, Israel (Ex. 3:14–15, 6:3), who was in Egyptian bondage, is used in the Book of Job only in its beginning – up to seemingly fatal blow received by Job (the Tetragrammaton sounds three times in the mouth of Job himself; Job 1:21c–d), and at the end, when the Lord Himself appears to the suffering Job – in Job 38:1–42:6 (the author’s remarks introducing the Lord’s speeches and Job’s answers), as well as in the prosaic part concluding the book, which tells about the rebirth of Job to life by the Lord and the restoration of everything that he had (Job 42:7–17).

But the Tetragrammaton is not used in the speeches of Job affected by the deadly disease and lost practically everything except his wife (a personification of the Jewesses?) and in the orations of his multinational interlocutors27, full of pathos and represented in poetic form28; they all designate God by the terms ʼēl / ʼĕlôah / ʼĕlōhîm , "God", šadday , the traditional interpretation: "Almighty"29, ῾elyôn , "the Most High", known in the Semitic milieu. (In this connection let us note that, as cuneiform sources and bulls show, the Judaeans in Babylonia sometimes gave their children local Neo-Babylonian names, and also replaced the typical Jewish component -yahu (abbreviated form of the Tetragrammaton YHWH) in their theophoric names to the general-Semitic element - ʼēl 30.) It seems that the use of the Tetragrammaton by the author of the Book of Job symbolizes the presence the people of Judaea, whom Job supposedly personifies, in their homeland: the beginning of the book – the period before the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem; the end of the book – the appearance of the Lord to the Jews in the Babylonian captivity (by analogy with the way it was during the slavery of the Jews in Egypt; cf. especially: Ex. 3:14–15, 6:3) and the “return of captives” to Judaea and the construction of a new Temple in Jerusalem. The genre organization of the book also contributes to the expression of this idea: prosaic beginning and end, describing the pious and serene life of Job, are probably called upon to lead the reader to the idea that the life of the Jews, whom Job ex hypothesi personified, will return/returns to its blessed origins.

II

In the mid-160’s B.C.E. the Jews again found themselves on the verge of ending of their national existence – this time in connection with the terrible persecutions that the Seleucid king Antiochus IV Epiphanes (whose state included Judaea then) brought upon them. The king ordered the Jews to abandon the basic elements of their religion under the threat of painful death. At this time, the faithful Jews demonstrated mass examples of martyrdom for faith – for the first time in the history of mankind; simultaneously, other Jews were ready to take a collaborative attitude towards the Hellenizers –for fear or by conviction. It is to this period that the first indisputable indications of the appearance among the Judaeans of the doctrine of the individual bodily resurrection from the dead at the End of the Days date back. This concept could crystallize under the influence of the expressive allegories of the rising from the dead of the people of Israel/Judaea in the flesh, i. e. , their revival in the Motherland, used by prophets of the Babylonian captivity period and, as may be supposed, by the author of the Book of Job.31 The doctrine of the individual bodily resurrection is attested, first of all, in the Book of Daniel, composed in its modern form in Judaea towards the end of 165– 164 B.C.E.32 So, Dan . 12:1–3 says:

<…> And there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since nations came into existence to that time.

And at that time (certain of) your people shall be delivered, all those who are found written in the Book.

And many of those who sleep

(in) the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, some to shame (and) everlasting contempt.

Those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the firmament,33 and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever.

Perhaps it was supposed that the most terrible sinners would not be resurrected at all, which was regarded as the most severe punishment.34

Dan . 12:13 contains an individual presage to the righteous Daniel himself:

“And you, go to (your) end, and you will rest, but (afterwards) you will arise ( wĕṯa̒ămōḏ ) to (receive) your lot at the End of the days”.

In the Hasmonean and Еarly Roman periods, the doctrine of the bodily resurrection of the dead in the End of the Days was widely spread in the Judaean society. 35 It is attested in the Dead Sea scrolls, in particular, in the works of the Qum-ran community36,37 a number of pseudepigraphs38 and other compositions of the

Judaeans39, becoming one of the most important components of Judaistic eschatology.

The Apostle Paul introduces a significant aspect in the doctrine of the resurrection: in 1 Cor . 15:42–55 and Philip . 3:20–21 he foretells the resurrection of the dead in the “incorruptible” “spiritual bodies” of “heavenly” nature, as well as the “change”, “transformation” of the bodies of the living, “putting on imperishability” and “immortality” at the End of the Days.40 It is possible that this idea goes back to the passage of Dan . 12:1–3 already cited above, judging by which the author of the Book of Daniel believed that as those who will survive to the End of the Days, so also those who rise from the dead then will receive eternal bodies of a radiant heavenly nature – of course, only the “wise” and “righteous” ones are meant here.

Список литературы The Babylonian exile of the Judaeans and the formation of the doctrine of the bodily resurrection from the dead: from the naturalistic allegory of the collective revival of the Jews upon their expected return to Judaea through the personified image of the people's rising from the dead to the concept of an individual eschatological resurrection in the flesh

  • Albright, W.F. (1954) "Northwest Semitic Names in a List of Egyptian Slaves from the
  • Eighteenth Century B.C.", Journal of the American Oriental Society, 74, 223-233. Amusin, I.D. (1983) The Qumran Community. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian). Blenkinsopp, J. (2002). Isaiah 40-55: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York, NY: Doubleday. Brown, W. P. (2011) Ecclesiastes: Interpretation. A Bible Commentary for Teaching and
  • Preaching. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press. Coogan, M.D. (1974) "Life in the Diaspora: Jews at Nippur in the Fifth Century", Biblical
  • Archaeologist 37, 6-12. Dupont-Sommer, A. (1980) Les écrits esséniens découverts près de la mer Morte. 4 éd. Paris: Payot.
  • Fokkelman, J.P. (2012) The Book ofJob in Form. A Literary Translation with Commentary. Leiden: Brill.
  • Hartman, L. F.; Di Lella, A.A. (1978) The Book of Daniel. Introduction, translation with notes, and commentary. The Anchor Bible. New York, NY: Doubleday. Pope, M.H. (1973) Job. Introduction, Translation, and Notes, The Anchor Bible. New York, NY: Doubleday,1973.
  • Purvis J. D. (1988) "Exile and Return. From the Babylonian Destruction to the Reconstruction of the Jewish State", // Ancient Israel. Ed. by H. Shanks. Washington, DC, 151175.
  • Seow, C.L. (1997) Ecclesiastes. A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Seow, C.L. (2003). Daniel. Louisville; London: Westminster John Knox Press.
  • Seow, C.L. (2013). Job 1-21: Interpretation and Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
  • Sweeney, M.A. Isaiah 1-39. With an Introduction to Prophetic Literature. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tantlevskij, I.R., Svetlov, R.V. (2014") "Predestination and Essenism", ХХОЛН (Schole), 8.1, 50-53.
  • Tantlevskij, I. R.; Svetlov R. V. (2014b) "The Essenes as the Pythagoreans: Predestination in Pythagoreanism, Platonism and the Qumran Theology", ЕХОЛН (Schole) 8.1., 5466 (in Russian with an English abstract).
  • Tantlevskij, I. R. (2014°) "Optimism of Ecclesiastes", Voprosy Filosofii 11, 137-148 (in Russian with an English abstract).
  • Tantlevskij, I. R. (2015) "Non-Mortal, Mortal and Immortal Adam in Biblical Anthropogo-ny Teachings", Voprosy Filosofii 6, 141-153 (in Russian with an English abstract).
  • Tantlevskij, I.R. (2016a) "Further Considerations on Possible Aramaic Etymologies of the Designation of the Judaean Sect of Essenes ('Eccaio 1 /'Eccnvoi) in the Light of the Ancient Authors Accounts of Them and the Qumran Community World-View", ЕХОЛН (Schole), 10.1, 61-75.
  • Tantlevskij, I.R. (2016b) "Spinoza's Deus et Natura in Context of Maimonides's and Gikatilla's Views on God's Acts in the "Nature's" Formation", Voprosy Filosofii 3, 170-185 (in Russian with an English abstract).
  • Tantlevskij, I.R. (2017) "Possible Parallels in Ecclesiastes' and Aristotle's Reflections Concerning the Eternity and Immortality of the Soul in Correlation with Its Intellectual and Ethical Merits", ЕХОЛН (Schole), 11.1, 133-143.
  • Tantlevskij, I.R. (2018) "How to Come to the Correct Solution? To the Interpretation of the Epistemological Definition of the Method of Comparison in Aristotle (Ethica Eu-demia, VII, 1245K13-14) and Ecclesiastes 7:27", ХХОЛН (Schole), 12.1, 17-30 (in Russian with an English abstract).
  • VanderKam, J., Flint, P.W., eds. (2002) The Book of Daniel. Composition and Reception. Vols. I-II. Leiden: Brill.
  • VanderKam, J., Flint, P.W. (2013) The Meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Their Significance for Understanding the Bible, Judaism, Jesus, and Christianity. Foreword by E. Tov. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
  • Whybray, R.N. (2004) The Second Isaiah. London; New York, NY: T&T Clark International.
  • Амусин, И.Д. (1983) Кумранская община. М.: Наука.
  • Тантлевский, И.Р. (2014е) "Оптимизм Экклесиаста", Вопросы философии, 11, 137-148.
  • Тантлевский, И.Р., Светлов, Р.В. (2014b) "«Ессеи как пифагорейцы»: предестинация в пифагореизме, платонизме и кумранской теологии", ЕХОЛН (Schole) 8.1, 5466.
  • Тантлевский, И.Р. (2015) "Адам-несмертный, смертный и бессмертный в библейских антропогонических учениях", Вопросы философии, 6, 141-153.
  • Тантлевский, И.Р. (20i6b) Deus et Natura у Спинозы в контексте воззрений Маймо-нида и Джикатилы на деяния Бога по созиданию "Природы", Вопросы философии, 3, 170-185.
  • Тантлевский, И.Р. (2018) Как прийти к правильному решению? К интерпретации эпистемологического определения метода сравнения у Аристотеля (Ethica Eudem-ia, VIII, 1245b.13-14) и Экклесиаста (Эккл 7:27), ЕХОЛН (Schole), 12.1, 17-30.
Еще
Статья научная