The comparative analysis of design right and copyright

Автор: Nikola Milosavljević

Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa @pravni-fakultet

Рубрика: Review paper

Статья в выпуске: 2 vol.38, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

A large variety of market relations are regulated by intellectual property rights, which represent legitimate monopolies correcting certain inefficiencies of a profit distribution on the market. In the following paper, the author examines the relations between design right and copyright using the comparative method. Firstly the author will analyze both resemblances and differences between these two intellectual property rights. The resemblance in protection object in particular makes available the cumulation of protected rights, in other words, the possibility of protecting industrial design by copyright, which will also be analyzed in the paper. Such work aims to comprehend the hybrid nature of design right as a right usually bypassed in a legal theory, and which is, in the author’s opinion, especially interesting.

Еще

Design right, copyright, comparison, cumulation of protection, intellectual property law

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170202236

IDR: 170202236   |   DOI: 10.5937/ptp2102129M

Список литературы The comparative analysis of design right and copyright

  • Directive (EU) No. 98/71/EC on the legal protection of designs, OJ L 289/28 of 13/10/1998
  • Regulation (EU) No. 6/2002 on community design, OJ L 003 , 05/01/2002 P. 0001 – 0024 of 12/01/2001
  • Barre`re, C. & Delabruye`re, S. (2011). Intellectual property rights on creativity and heritage: the case of the fashion industry. Eur J Law Econ 32, pp. 305–339. DOI 10.1007/s10657-011-9230-2
  • Denicola, R. C. (1983). Applied Art and Industrial Design: A Suggested Approach to Copyright in Useful Articles. Minnesota Law Review 2228, pp. 707–748. Downloaded 2020, March 21 from https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/2228
  • Fryer, W. T. (1988). Industrial Design Protection in the United States of America-Present situation and Plans for Revision. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Ofce 70 (12), pp. 820–846. Downloaded 2020, March 27 from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jpatos70&collection=journals&id=846&startid=&endid=872
  • Jović, N. (2019). Uticaj digitalizacije na razvoj autorskog prava u Evropskoj uniji [The Effect of Digitalization on the Development of Copyright in the European Union]. Revija za evropsko pravo, 21, pp. 85–98
  • Krstinić, D. & Vasiljković, J. (2019). Autorsko pravo i digitalne tehnologije [Copyright and Digital Technologies]. In: Carić, M. (prir.), Pravo i digitalne tehnologije: zbornik referata sa XVI Međunarodnog naučnog skupa Pravnički dani prof. dr Slavko Carić [Law and Digital Technologies: The collection of reports of XVI International scientific conference Lawyer days prof. PhD Slavko Caric] (pp. 267–278). Novi Sad: Univerzitet Privredna akademija, Pravni fakultet
  • Laygo, J. E. (2018). The nexus between Creativity and Innovation: A Comparative Approach to Copyright and Industrial Design Protection. Ateneo Law Journal 62 (4), pp. 1280–1372. Dowloaded 2020, April 27 from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ateno62&collection=journals&id=1280&startid=&endid=1372
  • Marković, S. (2014). Pravo intelektualne svojine i informaciono društvo [The Intellectual Property Law and the Information Society]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
  • Marković, S. (2020). O autorskom pravu, trojedinstvu subjekata zaštite i internetu [On copyright, triunity of copyright holders and internet]. In: Popović, D. (ured.), Intelektualna svojina i internet [The Intellectual Property and Internet]. (pp. 9–22). Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
  • Miladinović, Z. (2009). Pravo intelektualne svojine [The Intellectual Property Law]. Kragujevac: Univerzitet u Kragujevcu Pravni fakultet
  • Ognjanović, S. & Cvetković, P. (2007). Odnos prava konkurencije i intelektualne svojine [Relationship between Competition Rights and Rights of Intellectual Property Law]. Pravo-teorija i praksa, 24 (11-12), pp. 34–39. Dowloaded 2020, April 10 from http://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/497
  • Popesku, D. (2016). Fotografja kao autorsko delo [Photography as a work of authroship]. Pravo i privreda, (7-9), pp. 390–403
  • Raičević, V., Spasić, S. & Glomazić, R. (2010). Čovek i pravo intelektualne svojine [Man and Intellectual Property Rights]. Pravo-teorija i praksa, 27 (3-4), pp. 94–108. Dowloaded 2020, April 10 from http://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/293
  • Saidman, P. J. & Esquerra, T. (2008). A Manifesto on Industrial Design Protection: Resurrecting the design registration league. Journal of the Copyright Society of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A, 55 (2-3), pp. 423–433. Dowloaded 2020, March 27 from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jocoso55&collection=journals&id=453&startid=&endid=466
  • Setliff, E. (2006). Copyright and industrial design: An alternative design alternative. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 30 (1), pp. 49- 78. Downloaded 2020, March 29 from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cjla30&collection=journals&id=55&startid=&endid=84
  • Vlasković, B. (2012). Individualnost industrijskog dizajna [The individuality of the Industrial Design]. In: Mićović M. (ured.), Pravo i usluge: zbornik radova sa VIII Majskog savetovanja [The Law and Services: collection of the papers from the VIII May Conference]. (pp. 559-571). Kragujevac: Pravni Fakultet u Kragujevcu, Institut za pravne i društvene nauke
  • Zakon o pravnoj zaštiti industrijskog dizajna [Law on the legal protection of industrial design]. Službeni glasnik RS, no. 104/09, 45/15 and 44/18 – other law
Еще
Статья научная