The impact of geographical factors on expanding trade interactions between countries (on the example of the Asia-Pacific region)

The impact of geographical factors on expanding trade interactions between countries (on the example of the Asia-Pacific region)

Автор: Izotov D.А.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Branch-wise economy

Статья в выпуске: 6 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The aim of the study is to assess the impact of geographical factors on trade in the Asia-Pacific region. We show that physical distance is the key parameter in assessing the influence of geographical factors on trade within the framework of gravity dependence. The estimates obtained confirm the validity of the hypothesis concerning a long-term reduction in the negative impact of physical distance calculated in various ways on trade in the Asia-Pacific region, indicating the invariance in the choice of values of this parameter to determine the general trend of the influence of geographical factors on commodity exchange in the subglobal region. It is determined that the use of an arithmetic mean physical distance is more acceptable for obtaining correct estimates of the influence of geographical factors on trade in the Asia-Pacific region in terms of compliance with formal criteria for gravitational modeling. The negative impact of physical distance on trade in the Asia-Pacific region has decreased by almost 13% by 2021 compared to 1993, indicating a high intensity of commodity exchange in the subglobal region. The estimates obtained confirm the assumption that the land border has a positive impact on trade turnover in the Asia-Pacific region, which increased by 56% in 1993-2021. We find that the presence of a land border contributed to the expansion of trade between border economies in comparison with other countries of the Asia-Pacific region by 208.3% in 2021. The assessment shows the absence of a statistically significant impact of other factors - the colonial past and linguistic community - on trade in the Asia-Pacific region; this indicates the leveling of ties formed in the past due to the dominance of gravitational attraction between economies in terms of reducing barriers in interactions between them. It is shown that against the background of a decrease in comparative transport costs in the Asia-Pacific region, the current sanctions against Russia are able to limit the geographical distribution of Russian exports, reducing it to the neighborhood markets of the subglobal region, where the Russian economy will experience an increasing gravitational pull from China.

Еще

Trade, geographical factors, physical distance, transport costs, land border, linguistic community, colonial past, gravity model, asia-pacific region

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147242472

IDR: 147242472   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.6.90.2

Список литературы The impact of geographical factors on expanding trade interactions between countries (on the example of the Asia-Pacific region)

  • Anderson J.E., van Wincoop E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93, 171–192. DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455214
  • Baier S.L., Kerr A., Yotov Y.V. (2018). Gravity, distance, and international trade. In: Handbook of International Trade and Transportation. DOI: 10.4337/9781785366154.00007
  • Baldwin R., Taglioni D. (2006). Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12516. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w12516
  • Barajas I.A., Sisto N.P., Gaytán E.A. et al. (2014). Trade flows between the United States and Mexico: NAFTA and the Border Region. Journal of Urban Research, 10. DOI: 10.4000/articulo.2567
  • Bergstrand J.H., Larch M., Yotov Y.V. (2015). Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in gravity equations. European Economic Review, 78, 307–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.003
  • Bertho F., Borchert I., Mattoo A. (2016). The trade reducing effects of restrictions on liner shipping. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44, 231–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2016.03.001
  • Bista R., Tomasik R. (2019). Time zones, GDP & exports. Applied Economics Letters, 26, 496–500. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2018.1486980
  • Borchert I., Yotov Y.V. (2017). Distance, globalization, and international trade. Economics Letters, 153, 32–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.01.023
  • Bosquet C., Boulhol H. (2015). What is really puzzling about the “distance puzzle”. Review of World Economics, 151, 1–21. DOI: 10.1007/s10290-014-0201-x
  • Buch C.M., Kleinert J., Toubal F. (2004). The distance puzzle: On the interpretation of the distance coefficient in gravity equations. Economics Letters, 83, 293–298. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2003.10.022
  • Carter D.B., Poast P. (2017). Why do States build walls? Political economy, security, and border stability. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61, 239–270. DOI: 10.1177/0022002715596776
  • Chaney T. (2014). The network structure of international trade. American Economic Review, 104, 3600–3634. DOI: 10.2307/43495348
  • Eaton J., Kortum S. (2002). Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica, 70, 1741–1779. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00352
  • Egger P.H., Larch M., Yotov Y.V. (2022). Gravity estimations with interval data: Revisiting the impact of free trade agreements. Economica, 89, 44–61. DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12394
  • Fan L., Li X., Zhang S., Zhang Z. (2018). Vessel size, investments and trade. In: Handbook of International Trade and Transportation. DOI: 10.4337/9781785366154.00027
  • Filina V.N. (2009). Transport logistics services in Russia in the context of integration into the world market. Problemy prognozirovaniya=Studies on Russian Economic Development, 3, 45–57 (in Russian).
  • Filippini C., Molini V. (2003). The determinants of East Asian trade flows: A gravity equation approach. Journal of Asian Economics, 14, 695–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2003.10.001
  • Hassner R., Wittenberg J. (2015). Barriers to entry: Who builds fortified borders and why? International Security, 40, 157–190. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00206
  • Head K., Mayer T. (2010). Illusory border effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. In: Van Bergeijk P., Brakman S. (Eds.). The Gravity Model in International Trade: Advances and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511762109.006
  • Head K., Mayer T. (2013). What separates us? Sources of resistance to globalization. Canadian Journal of Economics, 46, 1196–1231. DOI: 10.1111/caje.12055
  • Head K., Mayer T., Ries J. (2010). The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics, 81, 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.01.002
  • Hummels D., Lugovskyy V., Skiba A. (2009). The trade reducing effects of market power in international shipping. Journal of Development Economics, 89, 84–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.05.001
  • Izotov D.A. (2020a). The effects of Asia-Pacific countries’ trade integration in the context of globalization and regionalization. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(4.), 91–107. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.4.70.5 (in Russian).
  • Izotov D.A. (2020b). Trade interaction between Chinese regions and Russia: The border effect. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 16(3), 24–51. DOI: 10.14530/se.2020.3.024-051 (in Russian).
  • Izotov D.A. (2023). Trade effects in the commodity markets of the APR. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(3), 126–141. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.3.87 (in Russian).
  • Jacks D.S., Meissner C.M., Novy D. (2011). Trade booms, trade busts, and trade costs. Journal of International Economics, 83, 185–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.10.008.
  • Khuziyatov T.D. (2010). Maritime navigation of the Asia-Pacific countries during the global crisis. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik=Russian Foreign Economic Journal, 1, 43–49 (in Russian).
  • Lin F., Sim N.C.S. (2012). Death of distance and distance puzzle. Econometrics Letters, 116, 225–228. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.03.004
  • Lopez S.A., Ezcaray R.H. (2015). Gravity Estimations to Correct the “Small Shares Stay Small” Bias in Economic Models. The Example of Mercosur and EU Agri-Food Trade. EUR 27264. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; JRC96089. DOI: 10.2791/531517
  • Novoseltsev E.M., Kholosha M.V. (2011). Regional aspects of the development of the marine fleet in the Far Eastern basin. Vestnik transporta, 10, 11–15 (in Russian).
  • Olayele B.F. (2019). Gravity, borders, and regionalism: A Canada–US sub-national analysis. The International Trade Journal, 33, 416–443. DOI: 10.1080/08853908.2019.1628675
  • Santos Silva J., Tenreyro S. (2006). The log of gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641–658. DOI: 10.1162/rest.88.4.641
  • Starr H., Thomas G. (2002). The “nature” of contiguous borders: Ease of interaction, salience, and the analysis of crisis. International Interactions, 28, 213–235. DOI: 10.1080/03050620213655
  • Wei S.-J., Frankel J.A. (1997). Open versus closed trade blocs. In: Ito T., Krueger A.O. (Eds.). Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements. NBER-EASE. Available at: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8598
  • Yotov Y.V. (2012). A simple solution to the distance puzzle in international trade. Economics Letters, 117, 794–798. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.08.032
  • Yotov Y.V. (2022). Gravity at Sixty: The Workhorse Model of Trade. CESifo Working Paper, No. 9584, Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4037001
  • Yu S., Tang H.C., Xu X. (2014). The impact of the ACFTA on ASEAN–PRC trade: Estimates based on an extended gravity model for component trade. Applied Economics, 46, 2251–2263. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2014.899676
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©