The impact of multiple overlapping new generations drug-eluting stents on six-month clinical outcomes in patients with anterior STEMI treated with primary PCI

Автор: Elakabawi Karim, Feng Jiahao, Ullah Hameed, Tawfik Wael, Mahrous Mohamed, Salem Mohamed, Guo Ning, Yuan Zuyi

Журнал: Cardiometry @cardiometry

Рубрика: Original research

Статья в выпуске: 17, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Background Implantation of multiple (≥ 2) overlapping stents has been associated with adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, data regarding the impact of multiple new generations drug-eluting stents (DES) during primary PCI (PPCI) are limited. Objective To evaluate the impact of multiple overlapping stents implantation on the 6-months clinical outcomes of anterior STEMI patients undergoing PPCI with new generations DES. Methods We evaluated a total of 1078 consecutive anterior STEMI patients who underwent PPCI with deployment of new generations DES. The patients were divided according to the number of implanted stents into 2 groups; multiple-stents group having ≥2 overlapping stents (n =388) and single-stent group (n =690). We compared the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; composite of cardiac death, reinfarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), definite stent thrombosis (ST), and stroke) between the 2 study groups. Results There was a non-significant trend toward increased in-hospital mortality in the multiple-stents group [3.4% vs 1.7%; P=0.096]related to a significant higher rate of cardiogenic shock [9.5% vs 6.1%; P=0.037] and post-procedural suboptimal TIMI flow [26.3% vs 19.4%; P=0.009] as compared to the single-stent group. Yet, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the incidence of 6-month MACEs: [9% vs 7.1%; P=0.259], cardiac death: [4.6% vs 3%; P=0.173], reinfarction: [3.6% vs 3.2%; P=713], TVR: [4.4% vs 4.1%; P=0.799], and definite ST: [3.6% vs 2.8%; P=0.43], respectively. Conclusion The use of multiple new generations DES, if needed, is relatively safe and acceptable during PPCI for STEMI patients.

Еще

St elevation myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, drug-eluting stents, stent overlap

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148311479

IDR: 148311479   |   DOI: 10.12710/cardiometry.2020.17.7684

Список литературы The impact of multiple overlapping new generations drug-eluting stents on six-month clinical outcomes in patients with anterior STEMI treated with primary PCI

  • Steg PG, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Fox KAA, Eagle KA, Flather MD, et al. Baseline characteristics, manage-ment practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Am J Cardiol 2002;90:358–63.
  • Schampaert E, Moses JW, Schofer J, Schlüter M, Gershlick AH, Cohen EA, et al. Sirolimus-Eluting Stents at Two Years: A Pooled Analysis of SIRIUS, E-SIRIUS, and C-SIRIUS With Emphasis on Late Re-vascularizations and Stent Thromboses. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:36–41.
  • Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA, Santos RM, Gandhi SK, Little WC. Effect of length and diam-eter of drug-eluting stents versus baremetal stents on late outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:35–42.
  • Tsagalou E, Chieffo A, Iakovou I, Ge L, Sangiorgi GM, Corvaja N, et al. Multiple overlapping drug-elut¬ing stents to treat diffuse disease of the left anteri¬or descending coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(10):1570–3.
  • Dawkins KD, Grube E, Guagliumi G, Banning AP, Zmudka K, Colombo A, et al. Clinical efficacy of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treat¬ment of complex, long coronary artery lesions from a multicenter, randomized trial: support for the use of drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practice. Circulation 2005;112:3306–13.
  • Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cannon L, Mann JT, Greenberg JD, Spriggs D, et al. Comparison of a Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent With a Bare Metal Stent in Pa¬tients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA 2005;294:1215.
  • Kereiakes DJ, Wang H, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Dono¬hoe DJ, Schofer J, et al. Periprocedural and Late Con-sequences of Overlapping Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Pooled Analysis of Five Clinical Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:21–31.
  • Shirai S, Kimura T, Nobuyoshi M, Morimoto T, Ando K, Soga Y, et al. Impact of Multiple and Long Si-rolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation on 3-Year Clinical Outcomes in the j-Cypher Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:180–8.
  • Konishi H, Miyauchi K, Dohi T, Tsuboi S, Ogita M, Naito R, et al. Impact of stent length on clinical outcomes of first-generation and new-generation drug-eluting stents. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2016;31:114–21.
  • Honda Y, Muramatsu T, Ito Y, Sakai T, Hirano K, Yamawaki M, et al. Impact of ultra-long second-gen-eration drug-eluting stent implantation. Catheter Car¬diovasc Interv 2016;87:E44–53.
  • Choi IJ, Koh Y-S, Lim S, Kim JJ, Chang M, Kang M, et al. Impact of the Stent Length on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation. Am J Cardiol 2014;113:457–64.
  • Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth universal defini¬tion of myocardial infarction (2018). Russ J Cardiol 2019;24:107–38.
  • Levine G, Bates E, Blankenship J, Bailey S, Bittl J, Cercek B, et al. 2015 ACC / AHA / SCAI Focused Up¬date on Primary PCI for Patients with STEMI : Circu¬lation 2016;133:1135–47.
  • Ding S, Pu J, Qiao ZQ, Shan P, Song W, Du Y, et al. TIMI myocardial perfusion frame count: A new meth-od to assess myocardial perfusion and its predictive value for short-term prognosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:722–32.
  • Laskey WK, Yancy CW, Maisel WH. Thrombosis in coronary drug-eluting stents: report from the meet-ing of the Circulatory System Medical Devices Advi¬sory Panel of the Food and Drug Administration Cen¬ter for Devices and Radiologic Health, December 7-8, 2006. Circulation 2007;115:2352–7.
  • Jaffe R, Dick A, Strauss BH. Prevention and treat¬ment of microvascular obstruction-related myocardi¬al injury and coronary no-reflow following percuta¬neous coronary intervention: A systematic approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:695–704.
  • Bae JH, Kwon TG, Hyun DW, Rihal CS, Lerman A. Predictors of slow flow during primary percuta¬neous coronary intervention: An intravascular ultra¬sound-virtual histology study. Heart 2008;94:1559–64.
  • Ito H. Etiology and clinical implications of micro¬vascular dysfunction in patients with acute myocardi¬al infarction. Int Heart J 2014;55:185–9.
  • Ndrepepa G, Tiroch K, Keta D, Fusaro M, Seyfarth M, Pache J, et al. Predictive factors and impact of no reflow after primary percutaneous coronary interven¬tion in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:27–33.
  • Bouleti C, Mewton N, Germain S. The no-reflow phenomenon: State of the art. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2015;108:661–74.
  • Prati F, Capodanno D, Pawlowski T, Ramazzotti V, Albertucci M, La Manna A, et al. Local delivery versus intracoronary infusion of abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:928–34.
  • Wang H, Eitzman DT. Acute myocardial infarction leads to acceleration of atherosclerosis. Atherosclero-sis 2013;229:18–22.
  • Keeley EC, Mehran R, Brener SJ, Witzenbi¬chler B, Guagliumi G, Dudek D, et al. Impact of multiple complex plaques on short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the Harmonizing Outcomes With Revas¬cularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial In¬farction [HORIZONS-AMI] Trial). Am J Cardiol 2014;113:1621–7.
  • Suh J, Park D-W, Lee J-Y, Jung IH, Lee S-W, Kim Y-H, et al. The Relationship and Threshold of Stent Length With Regard to Risk of Stent Thrombosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:383–9.
  • Tada T, Byrne RA, Simunovic I, King LA, Cassese S, Joner M, et al. Risk of Stent Thrombosis Among Bare-Metal Stents, First-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents, and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: Results From a Registry of 18,334 Patients. JACC Car¬diovasc Interv 2013;6:1267–74.
  • Kolandaivelu K, Swaminathan R, Gibson WJ, Ko¬lachalama VB, Nguyen-Ehrenreich K-L, Giddings VL, et al. Stent thrombogenicity early in high-risk inter¬ventional settings is driven by stent design and deploy-ment and protected by polymer-drug coatings. Circu¬lation 2011;123:1400–9.
  • De Luca G, Smits P, Hofma SH, Di Lorenzo E, Vla¬chojannis GJ, van’t Hof AWJ, et al. Everolimus eluting stent vs first generation drug-eluting stent in primary angioplasty: A pooled patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol 2017;244:121–7.
  • Pandya B, Gaddam S, Raza M, Asti D, Nalluri N, Vazzana T, et al. Biodegradable polymer stents vs sec-ond generation drug eluting stents: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Cardiol 2016, 8 (2): 240-246.
  • Schömig A, Neumann F-J, Kastrati A, Schühlen H, Blasini R, Hadamitzky M, et al. A Randomized Com-parison of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy af¬ter the Placement of Coronary-Artery Stents. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1084–9.
  • Fukutomi M, Takahashi M, Toriumi S, Ogoyama Y, Oba Y, Funayama H, et al. Evaluation of stent length on the outcome of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Coron Artery Dis 2019;30:196–203.
Еще
Статья научная