The USA's impact in solving border disputes in the Transcaucasia in 1919-1920

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. The Transcaucasian states waged war with each other and desperately wanted to find some disinterested party to resolve their territorial disputes in 1918-1921. The territory was first occupied by the countries of the Triple Alliance, then by the Entente countries, and each of them contributed to the formation or resolution of territorial disputes. Methods and materials. Based on the historical-systemic and historical-genetic approaches, the author determines which territorial changes were proposed in the region by representatives of the United States and why. The documents collected in the State Archive of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Archive of Political Documents of the Office of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, and the National Archive of Armenia were involved for analysis. Analysis. The influence of the United States on the solution of territorial issues was determined by the general approach to the territory as passing into a mandate state. During the discussion of this issue, the understanding of the American representatives about the borders of this zone expanded first from Armenia in a general sense to Transcaucasia, and then narrowed to the borders of Turkish Armenia, which brought them back to the issue of the borders of the Republic of Armenia. At the same time, representatives working in the region proposed a plan for interstate disengagement, different from the British plan, and tried to introduce a governor-general in the disputed territory. Results. The remoteness from the region, the presence of a single channel of information about it through the Armenian Diaspora in the United States affected the narrow perception of the situation in the region by American representatives. The issue of the adoption of a mandate over Armenia or Transcaucasia and Armenia somehow got connected with the issue of costs for its effective implementation. The failed attempt to create an American governor-general in the disputed territories recorded a lack of understanding of the situation in the region and the possibilities of its control and provoked more conflicts between Armenians and Azerbaijani.

Еще

Usa, transcaucasia, american general government, nakhichevan, karabakh, border disputes, boundary

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149140080

IDR: 149140080

Список литературы The USA's impact in solving border disputes in the Transcaucasia in 1919-1920

  • Alieva S.I. Azerbajdzhanskaja Demokraticheskaja respublika i Gorskaja respublika: sotrudnichestvo, proekty obyedinenija i vzaimodejstvija s Osmanskoj imperiej (po dokumentam, dogovoram i notam 1918-1920 godov). Chast' 1 [Azerbaijan Democratic Republic and Mountain Republic: Cooperation, Projects of Unification and Interaction with the Ottoman Empire (According to Documents, Treaties and Notes of 1918-1920). Part 1]. Severo-Kavkazskij juridicheskij Vestnik, 2015, no. 4, pp. 115-137.
  • Alieva S.I. Azerbajdzhanskaja Demokraticheskaja respublika i Gorskaja respublika: sotrudnichestvo, proekty obyedinenija i vzaimodejstvija s Osmanskoj imperiej (po dokumentam, dogovoram i notam 1918-1920 godov). Chast' 1 [Azerbaijan Democratic Republic and Mountain Republic: Cooperation, Projects of Unification and Interaction with the Ottoman Empire (According to Documents, Treaties and Notes of 1918-1920). Part 2]. Severo-Kavkazskij juridicheskij Vestnik, 2016, no. 1, pp. 90-114.
  • Ambarcumjan K.R. Armjanskij vopros v sovetsko-tureckih otnoshenijah v 1921 g. [The Armenian Issue in Soviet-Turkish Relations in 1921]. Gumanitarnye i juridicheskie issledovanija, 2021, no. 3, pp. 18-25.
  • Ambartsumjan K.R. Politika otlozhennoy sovetizatsii: RSFSR i Gruziya v 1920-1921 godakh [Policy of Postponed Sovetization: Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and Georgia in 19201921]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations], 2021, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 119-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/ jvolsu4.2021.2.9.
  • Ambarcumjan K.R. Vlijanie sobytij fevralja 1917 g. na predstavlenija mestnyh soobshhestv o gosudarstvennosti narodov Kavkaza [Influence of February 1917 on the Vision of Local Communities of Caucasian Peoples As Regards Nationhood]. Gumanitarnye i juridicheskie issledovanija, 2016, no. 3, pp. 12-18.
  • Arhiv polkovnika Hauza. Izbrannoe. V 2 t. [Colonel House's Archives. Selected Works. In 2 Vols.]. Moscow, AST Publ., Astrel Publ., 2004, vol. 1. 602 p.; vol. 2. 744 p.
  • Arkhipova E.V. Britanskij sled na Juzhnom Kavkaze (1918-1919 gg.) [British Footprint in the South Caucasus (1918-1919)]. Novaja i novejshaja istorija, 2016, no. 3, pp. 216-223.
  • Arkhipova E.V. Trapezundskaya konferentsiya kak diplomaticheskiy triumf Osmanskoy imperii [Trebizond Conference As a Diplomatic Triumph of the Ottoman Empire]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations], 2014, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 122-129. DOI: http:/ /dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2014.5.13.
  • Mahmurjan G.G. Armenija v dokumentah Gosudarstvennogo departamenta SShA 19171920 gg. [Armenia in the US State Department Documents, 1917-1920]. Erevan, s. n., 2012. 560 p.
  • Avalov Z.D. Nezavisimost' Gruzii v mezhdunarodnoj politike 1918-1921 gg.: Vospominanija [Independence of Georgia in the International Relations in 1918-1921. Memoires]. Paris, s. n., 1924. 318 p.
  • Baku, Dzhafarovu, ministru inostrannyh del, 09.26.1919 [To Baku, For Dzhafarov, Minister of Foreign Affairs September 26, 1919]. Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Azerbaydzhanskoy Respubliki (GA AR) [Azerbaijan Republic State Archive (AR SA)], f. 970, inv. 1, d. 93, l. 7.
  • Gasanly Dzh.P. Istorija diplomatii Azerbajdzhanskoj Respubliki. V3 t. T. 1. Vneshnjaja politika Azerbajdzhanskoj Demokraticheskoj Respubliki (1918-1920) [Diplomatic History of the Azerbaijan Republic. In 3 Vols. Vol. 1. Azerbaijan Democratic Republic Foreign Policy (1918-1920)]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., Nauka Publ., 2010. 576 p.
  • Mahmurjan G.G. Anglo-amerikanskie protivorechija i Respublika Armenija v 19181920 gg. [Anglo-American Controversies and Republic of Armenia in 1918-1920]. SShA i Kanada: jekonomika, politika, ideologija [The United States and Canada: Economics, Politics, and Culture], 2000, no. 3, pp. 84-99.
  • Mahmurjan G.G. Popytki regional'nogo sotrudnichestva i II Konferencija Zakavkazskih respublik (9-22 aprelja 1920 g.) [Attempts of the Area Cooperation and the 2nd Conference of the Transcaucasian States (April 9-22, 1920)]. Istoriko-arheologicheskij zhurnal, 2010, no. 3 (185), pp. 54-71.
  • Mahmurjan G.G. Respublika Armenija 19181920 gg. vpolitike Velikobritanii [Great Britain Policy Towards Armenian Republic in 1918-1920]. Erevan, s. n., 2009. 344 p.
  • Meshidze Dzh.I. Ital'janskaja intervencija v Gruziju v 1919 g.: plany i obstojatel'stva [Italian Intervenes into Georgia in 1919: Plans and Circumstances]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, ser. 2, 2007, iss. 1, pp. 127-133.
  • Mukhanov V.M. «Socializm vinogradarej», ili Istorija Pervoj Gruzinskoj respubliki: 1917-1921 ["Socialism by Winegrowers" or the History of the First Georgian Republic: 1917-1921]. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2019. 928 p.
  • Mustafaeva S.O. Izmeneniegranic i territorij na Juzhnom Kavkaze (1917-1922 gg.) [Borders and Area Chanches in the Southern Caucasus (19171922)]. Baku, Bakinskiy Gosudarstvennyy Universitet, 2013. 24 p.
  • Mustafaeva S.O. Protsess ustanovleniya Azerbaydzhano-Gruzinskoy granitsy (1920-1922 gg.) [The Process of the Azerbaijan-Georgia Boundary Establishment (1920-1922 Years)]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2009, no. 1 (15), pp. 96-104.
  • Mustafaeva S.O. Sovetskaja Rossija i formirovanie granic mezhdu gosudarstvami Kavkaza (na primere Azerbajdzhana i Armenii) [Soviet Russia and Defining the Borders Between Caucasian States (The Azerbaijan and Armenia Case)]. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 2010, vol. 4, iss. 1-2, pp. 230-240.
  • Nota gossekraterja SShA B. Kolbi - poslu Francii v SShA Zh. Zhusseranu [Note by the US Secretary of State B. Colby to the French Ambassador to the USA J. Jusserand]. Natsional'nyy arkhiv Armenii (NAA) [National Archive of Armenia (NAA)], f. 200, inv. 1, d. 577, ch. 3, l. 241-242 back.
  • Petrosjan G.A. Otnoshenija Respubliki Armenija s Rossiej [Relations Between Republic of Armenia and Russia]. Erevan, Erevanskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2012. 424 p.
  • Pis'mo predsedatelja delegacii Azerbajdzhanskoj Respubliki na Parizhskoj mirnoj konferencii A.M. Topchibasheva predsedatelju Soveta ministrov Azerbaj dzhanskoj Respubliki, 06-10.11.1919 [A Letter by the Head of the Azerbaijan Delegation on the Paris Peace Conference A.M. Topchibashev to the Head of the Council of Ministers of the Azerbaijan Republic, November 6-10, 1919]. GA AR [AR SA], f. 970, inv. 1, d. 146, l. 11-12.
  • Protokol chastnogo soveshhanija chlenov azerbajdzhano-armjanskoj konferencii, sostojavshegosja 15 dekabija 1919 g. [Notes of the Private Meeting of the Members of the Azerbaijani-Armenian Conference Held on December 15, 1919]. GA AR [AR SA], f. 970, inv. 1, d. 95, l. 43-45.
  • Shtejn B.E. «Russkij vopros» na Parizhskoj mirnoj konferencii (1919-1920 gg.) ["Russian Question" During the Paris Peace Conference (1919— 1920)]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat, 1949. 464 p.
  • Soobshhenie «N'ju-Jork Geral'd»: Armenija ostavlena bez zashhity, kogda na nee gotovitsja ogromnoe napadenie ["New York Herald: Armenia is Left Unprotected When a Huge Attack is Being Prepared on It]. NAA, f. 200, inv. 1, d. 35, l. 187-191.
  • The Near East News: J. Harbord About Armenia, April 27, 1920. NAA, f. 200, inv. 1, d. 576, ch. 5, l. 255-255 back.
  • To Colonel Haskell, Chief High Comissioner of the Allied Powers in the Trans-Caucasus, September 1, 1919. GA AR [AR SA], f. 970, inv. 1, d. 93, l. 1-2.
  • Topchibashev A.M. Memorandum, predyjavlennyj nahodjashhimsja v Konstantinopole pochetnym predstaviteljam derzhav Antanty, chlenom
Еще
Статья научная