Theoretical approaches to studying people's motivation for creative labor activity in the socio-humanitarian thought

Theoretical approaches to studying people's motivation for creative labor activity in the socio-humanitarian thought

Автор: Shabunova Aleksandra A., Leonidova Galina V., Ustinova Kseniya A.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical issues

Статья в выпуске: 4 (58) т.11, 2018 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article raises the issues of motivation in the context of individual approaches (Freudian, behavioral, cognitive-psychological, etc.) in the framework of theoretical-personal and theoretical-associative fields. The goals of the article are as follows: to structure the main existing approaches to the study of motivation, and to determine the provisions that can be used in the framework of the motivation for people’s creative labor activity. The study used general logical methods and techniques, such as system approach, generalization, analysis, and synthesis. We conclude that the main source of people’s activity is need-based tension, and the aim is to eliminate it using external incentive factors. We show that the nature of behavior will be determined by the degree of consistency between different groups of motives, correlation of motives and external goals, and in the absence of such coordination - by volitional mechanisms of regulation. We point out that scientific literature contains no unambiguous definition of motivational-stimulating mechanism; the paper provides its interpretation from the standpoint of behavioral approach and A.N...

Еще

Motivational-stimulating mechanism, motive, stimulus, creative activity, labor activity

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224086

IDR: 147224086   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.4.58.6

Список литературы Theoretical approaches to studying people's motivation for creative labor activity in the socio-humanitarian thought

  • Tether B., Mina A., Consoli D., Gagliardi D. A literature review on skills and innovation. How does successful innovation impact on the demand for skills and how do skills drive innovation? CRIC report for the Department of trade and Industry, 2005.
  • Dessler G. Human Resource Management. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003.
  • Raznodezhina E.N., Krasnikov I.V. Motivatsiya rynochnoi organizatsii truda v sovremennykh usloviyakh . Ulyanovsk: UlGTU, 2011. 214 p.
  • Skripnichenko L.S. The study of work motivation specifics in enterprises of food industry. Innovatsionnaya nauka: mezhdunarodnyi nauchnyi zhurnal=Innovation Science: International Scientific Journal, 2015, no. 9, pp. 288-290..
  • Kehr H.M. Integrating implicit motives, explicit motives, and perceived abilities: the compensatory model of work motivation and volition. Academy of Management Review 2004, vol. 29, no. 3, рр. 479-499.
  • Brunstein J.C., Schultheiss O.C., Gra¨ssmann R. Personal goals and emotional well-being: The moderating role of motive dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, vol. 75, рp. 494-508.
  • Emmons R.A., McAdams D.P. Personal strivings and motive dispositions: Exploring the links. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991, vol. 17, рp. 648-654.
  • McClelland D.C., Koestner R., Weinberger J. How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 1989, vol. 96, рp. 690-702.
  • Spangler W.D. Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 1992, vol. 112, рp.140-154.
  • Russell I.L. Motivation. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Company, 1971.
  • Yorks L. A Radical Approach to Job Enrichment. New York: Amacom, 1976.
  • Kast F.E., Rosenzweig J.E. Organization and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1970.
  • Major psychological theories of motivation. Rationalistic and irrationalistic approaches to the essence and origin of motivation. Available at: http://www.newpsyholog.ru/newlos-45-2.html..
  • Leontiev D.A. (Ed.). Sovremennaya psikhologiya motivatsii . Moscow: Smysl, 2002. Pp. 36-37.
  • Weinberger J., McClelland D.C. Cognitive versus traditional motivational models: irreconcilable or complementary? In: Higgins E.T., Sorrentino R.M. (Eds.). Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior. Vol. 2. New York: Guilford Press, 1990. Pp. 562-597.
  • Koestner R., Weinberger J., McClelland D.C. Task-intrinsic and social-extrinsic sources of arousal for motives assessed in fantasy and self-report. Journal of Personality, 1991, vol. 59, рp. 57-82.
  • McClelland D.C. Scientific psychology as a social enterprise. Working paper. Boston University, 1995.
  • McClelland D.C. How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 1985, vol. 40, рp. 812-825.
  • Maslow A.H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 1943, vol. 50, рp. 370-396.
  • McClelland D.C., Atkinson J.W., Clark R.A., Lowell E.L. The Achievement Motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.
  • Atkinson J.W. An Introduction to Motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1964.
  • Higgins E.T. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1998, vol. 30, рp. 1-46.
  • Kanfer R., Heggestad E.D. Motivational traits and skills: A person-centered approach to work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1997, vol. 19, pр. 1-56.
  • Epstein S. Personal control from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In: Kofta M., Weary G., Sedek G. (Eds.). Personal Control in Action: Cognitive and Motivational Mechanisms. New York: Plenum Press, 1998. Pp. 5-26.
  • Metcalfe J., Mischel W. A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 1999, no. 106, pр. 3-19.
  • Cantor N., Blanton H. Effortful pursuit of personal goals in daily life. In: Bargh J. A., Gollwitzer P.M. (Eds.). The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1996. Pp. 338-359.
  • King L.A. Wishes, motives, goals, and personal memories: Relations of measures of human motivation. Journal of Personality, 1995, vol. 63, pp. 985-1007.
  • Sokolowski K., Schmalt H.-D., Langens T.A., Puca R.M. Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: The multi-motive grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 2000, vol. 74, pp. 126-145.
  • Sheldon K.M., Kasser T. Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, vol. 68, pp. 531-543.
  • Bazerman M.H., Tenbrunsel A.E., Wade-Benzoni K. Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 1998, vol. 23, pp. 225-241.
  • Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 2000, vol. 55, pp. 68-78.
  • Heckhausen H. Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain, 1963.
  • Fischhoff B., Goitein B., Shapira Z. The experienced utility of expected utility approaches. In: Feather N.T. (Ed.). Expectations and Actions: Expectancy-Value Models in Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1982. Pp. 315-339.
  • Eccles J.S. Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychol. Women Q., 1987, vol. 11, pp. 135-172.
  • Eccles J.S., Harold R.D. Gender differences in educational and occupational patterns among the gifted. In: Colangelo N., Assouline S.G., Ambroson D.L. (Eds.). Talent Development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Unionville, NY: Trillium Press, 1992.
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977, vol. 84, pp. 191-215.
  • Bandura A. Self-regulation of motivation and action through goal systems. In: Hamilton V., Bower G.H., Frijda N.H. (Eds.). Cognitive Perspectives on Emotion and Motivation. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 1988. Pp. 37-61.
  • Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 2000, vol. 11, pp. 227-268.
  • Lawler E.E. Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
  • Lawler E.E., Jenkins G.D. Strategic reward systems. In: Dunnette M.D., Hough L.M. (Eds.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 3 (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992. Pp. 1009-1055.
  • Srivastava A., Locke E.A., Bartol K.M. Money and subjective well-being: It’s not the money, it’s the motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, vol. 80, pp. 959-971.
  • Kanfer R. Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In: Dunnette M.D., Hough L.M. (Eds.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1990. Pp. 75-170.
  • Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya . Vol. 3. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1955.
  • Shavel’ S.A. Motivational-stimulating mechanism of social activity. In: Obshchestvennaya missiya sotsiologii . Minsk: Belaruskaya navuka, 2010. 404 p..
  • To know the society that we live in: an interview with Professor S.A. Shavel, Doc.Sci. (Sociol.). Sotsiologiya=Sociology, 2014, no. 2, pp. 5-15.
  • Popov A.V. Development of labor activity of the population. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of territory’s development, 2012, no. 6 (62), pp. 66-76.
  • Yagolkovskiy S.R. Creative activity within the innovative process: cognitive and group aspects. Psikhologiya: zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki=Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2013, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 98-108..
  • Bogdanchikova T.V. Labor and creative activity of employees in entrepreneurship. Omskii nauchnyi vestnik=Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 2006, no. 4 (38), pp. 181-184..
  • Gutman H. The biological roots of creativity. In: Exploration in Creativity. New York, 1967.
  • Rorbach M.A. La pensee vivante. Regles et techniques de la pensee creatice. Paris. 1959.
  • Zhabitskaya L.G. Revisiting the problem of leading motives for literary and artistic creativity. In: Tezisy nauchnykh soobshchenii sovetskikh psikhologov k VI Vsesoyuznomu s"ezdu Obshchestva psikhologov SSSR. Lichnost’ v sisteme obshchestvennykh otnoshenii. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problemy v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva . Moscow, 1983. Part 1. Pp. 116-118..
  • Sharov A.S. Ogranichennyi chelovek: znachimost’, aktivnost’, refleksiya . Omsk, 2000.
  • Kak opredelit’ i razvit’ sposobnosti rebenka . Compiled by V.M. Voskoboinikov. Saint Petersburg, 1996.
  • Kuleva M.I. Transformation of creative employment in modern Russia: on the example of employees of non-state art centers in Moscow. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya=Public Opinion Monitoring, 2017, no. 2 (138), March-April, pp. 50-62.
  • Aleksandrova E.A., Verkhovskaya O.R. Motivation of entrepreneurial activity: the role of institutional environment. Vestnik SPbGU. Ser. 8: Menedzhment=Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, 2016, no. 3, pp. 107-138..
  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Russia 2016/2017: National Report. Available at: http://gsom.spbu.ru/files/docs/gem_russia_2016-2017.pdf..
  • Efendiev A.G., Balabanova E.S., Gogoleva A.S. Organizational culture as a normative-role system of requirements to employees of Russian business organizations. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii=Journal of sociology and social anthropology, 2012, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 167-187..
  • Efendiev A.G., Balabanova E.S. "Human dimension" of Russian business: towards a democratic-humanistic type of social organization of a company. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 2012, no. 7, pp. 43-54..
  • Efendiev A.G., Balabanova E.S., Sorokin P.S. Careers at Russian business organizations as a social phenomenon: experience from empirical research. Mir Rossii=Universe of Russia, 2011, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 140-169..
  • Prokhorov A.P. Russkaya model’ upravleniya . Moscow: Studiya Artemiya Lebedeva, 2013.
  • Ponomarev Ya.A. Psikhologiya tvorchestva . Moscow, 1976.
  • Bush G.O. Osnovy evristiki dlya izobretatelei . Riga, 1977.
  • Sovetova O.S. Innovatsii: teoriya i praktika . Saint Petersburg, 1997.
  • Ponomarev Ya.A., Gadzhiev Ch.M. Psikhologicheskii mekhanizm gruppovogo (kollektivnogo) resheniya tvorcheskikh zadach: issledovanie problem psikhologii tvorchestva . Moscow, 1983. Pp. 279-295.
  • Amabile T.M. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 1996.
  • Kaufman J.C. Creativity 101. New York, NY: Springer, 2009.
  • Nicholls J.G. Quality and equality in intellectual development: The role of motivation in education. American Psychologist, 1979, vol. 34, pp. 1071-1084 DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.11.1071
  • Batson C.D. Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In: Berkowitz L. (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 20. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1987. Pp. 65-122 DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60412-8
  • Grant A.M., Berry J. The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, vol. 54, pp. 73-96 DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2011.59215085
  • Niu W., Sternberg R.J. Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: The East and the West. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2002, vol. 36, pp. 269-288 DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01069.x
  • Niu W., Sternberg X. The philosophical roots of western and eastern conceptions of creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 2006, vol. 26, pp. 1001-1021 DOI: 10.1037/h0091265
  • Dollinger S.J., Burke P.A., Gump N.W. Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 2007, vol. 19, pp. 91-103 DOI: 10.1080/10400410701395028
  • Polman E., Emich K.J. Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2011, vol. 37, pp. 492-501 DOI: 10.1177/0146167211398362
  • Arndt J., Greenberg J., Solomon S., Pyszczynski T., Schimel J. Creativity and terror management: Evidence that creative activity increases guilt and social projection following mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, vol. 77, pp. 19-32 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.19
  • Routledge C., Arndt J., Vess M., Sheldon, K.M. The life and death of creativity: The effects of mortality salience on self versus social-directed creative expression. Motivation and Emotion, 2008, vol. 32, pp. 331-338 DOI: 10.1007/s11031-008-9108-y
  • Carlo G., Randall B.A. The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2002, vol. 31, pp. 31-44 DOI: 10.1023/A:1014033032440
  • Chadwick R.A., Bromgard G., Bromgard I., Trafimow D. An index of specific behaviors in the moral domain. Behavior Research Methods, 2006, vol. 38, pp. 692-697 DOI: 10.3758/BF03193902
  • Rushton J.P., Chrisjohn R.D., Fekken G.C. The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 1981, vol. 2, pp. 293-302 DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(81)90084-2
  • Simonton D.K. Creativity. In: Snyder C.R., Lopez S.J. (Eds.). Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005. Pp. 189-201.
  • Scott G., Leritz L.E., Mumford M.D. The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 2004, vol. 16, pp. 361-388 DOI: 10.1080/10400410409534549
  • Hennessey B.A., Zbikowski S.M. Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward: A further examination of intrinsic motivation training techniques. Creativity Research Journal, 1993, vol. 6, pp. 297-307 DOI: 10.1080/10400419309534485
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©