Tradition and innovation in medical training: a brief overview
Автор: Borisov A.K.
Журнал: Международный журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук @intjournal
Статья в выпуске: 6-3 (33), 2019 года.
Бесплатный доступ
This article is dedicated to tradition and innovation in modern medical training. Due to scientific development, innovative methods are implemented in medical education alongside with the traditional ones. Despite valuable benefits these methods are arguably associated with insufficient amount of survival knowledge and well as fewer acquired skills. The article discusses current medical training, its problems and solutions. The authors compare advantages and disadvantages of different methods in medical training, and offers possible compromises. The problem of functional illiteracy, which is associated with the internet is pointed, possible keys to the problem are proposed.
Medical training, traditional methods, innovative methods, simulators, functional illiteracy
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170186476
IDR: 170186476 | DOI: 10.24411/2500-1000-2019-11286
Список литературы Tradition and innovation in medical training: a brief overview
- Abdulmohsen H. Al-Elq. Simulation-based medical teaching and learning // J Family Community Med. - 2010 Jan-Apr; 17(1): 35-40.
- DOI: 10.4103/1319-1683.68787
- Стеблецова А.О. Речевое воздействие в медицинском дискурсе // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: Филология. Журналистика. - 2018. - №2. - С.49-51.
- Stebletsova A.O., Torubarova I.I. Empathy development through ESP: a pilot study // Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies. - 2017. - № 16. - Р. 237-249.
- Wündrich M, Schwartz C, Feige B, Lemper D, Nissen C, Voderholzer U. Empathy training in medical students - a randomized controlled trial // Med.Teach. 2017 Oct; 39(10):10961098.
- . DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1355451
- Vágvölgyi R, Coldea A, Dresler T, Schrader J, Nuerk HC. A Review about Functional Illiteracy: Definition, Cognitive, Linguistic, and Numerical Aspects. Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 10;7:1617
