Трехмерный конечно-элементный анализ влияния ударной нагрузки от импактора переменной массы на распределение напряжений на поверхности "кость - имплантант"
Автор: Джеббар Н., Бачири А., Бутабут Б.
Журнал: Российский журнал биомеханики @journal-biomech
Статья в выпуске: 1 (99) т.27, 2023 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Применение имплантатов в стоматологии получило широкое распространение. Имплантаты, как правило, устанавливаются в частных стоматологических клиниках квалифицированными врачами. Биоматериалы - это материалы, которые предназначены для контакта с живой тканью и/или с биологическими жидкостями для оценки лечения изменения стандартов или замены любой ткани, органа или функции организма. Цель статьи - сравнить различия в напряжениях по Мизесу в системе «кость - имплантат» при ударном взаимодействии со сферическим и коническим имкаторами различной массы для того, чтобы подобрать подходящий материал коронки и защитить ткани, окружающие имплантат. Представлена геометрия модели для исследования проблемы контакта между двумя твёрдыми телами (коронка, импактор) без трения на границе «кость - имплантат» Рассмотрена задача о взаимодействии импактора с коронкой зуба, решённая методом конечных элементов. Были выполнены расчёты, где варьировалась масса импактора обеих форм. Результаты показали, что часть нагрузки передавалась на коронки костной ткани; причём в кортикальной кости напряжения были выше, чем в губчатой. Максимально напряжение по Мизесу, создаваемое сферическим импактором, ниже по сравнению с коническим импактором. При большой массе импактора напряжения могут быть критическими и привести к нарушению сплошности имплантата, а также кортикальной и губчатой костных тканей, как было показано в этом анализе. Распределение напряжений и их величина зависят от массы импактора, а при варьировании массы импактора вид кривых был идентичный. Показано, что напряжения по Мизесу увеличиваются с возрастанием массы импактора на имплантате и окружающих его тканях (кортикальные и губчатые кости).
Зубной протез, кость, импактор, ускорение, масса, конечно-элементный анализ
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/146282683
IDR: 146282683 | УДК: 531/534: | DOI: 10.15593/RZhBiomeh/2023.1.01
A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of a strike load from a variable mass impactor on the stress distribution to the bone-implant interface
Dental implants have become a well-publicised treatment modality in dentistry. Implants are generally placed in the private sector by dentists who have undertaken further learning. Biomaterials are materials intended to be in contact with living tissue and / or biological fluids to assess, treat, modify standards or replace any tissue, organ or function of the body. The purpose of this paper is to compare the differences in von Mises stress between spherical and conical impactor, whatever their mass. In order, to predict the material of the crown and to protect the tissues surrounding the implant. This paper presents the model geometry for the modelling of contact problems between two solid bodies (crown/impactor) without friction and that of bone/implant. Three-dimensional finite element model of dental prosthesis was developed considering the impact of the crown. For the design a contact was simulated between the lateral surface of the crown and the impactor. By use the model, computational simulations were performed varying the impactor’s mass for both shapes of impactor. The results also revealed only relatively low levels of stresses were transferred from the implant to the surrounding cortical and cancellous bone, with the majority of the stresses transferred to the cortical bone. Maximum von Mises stress generated by spherical impactor are lower than those obtained by conical impactor. For big mass of the impactor, the stresses may be critical since the mechanical properties of the implant material and the cortical and cancellous bone could not withstand stress magnitudes recorded in this analysis. The stresses distribution and magnitude depend of the impactor’s mass and different shapes of (stress - length of implant thread) curves are similar for different masses of the impactor. Indeed, the equivalent stress increases with increasing the impactor’s mass. The stresses were transferred from the implant to the surrounding cortical and cancellous bone.
Список литературы Трехмерный конечно-элементный анализ влияния ударной нагрузки от импактора переменной массы на распределение напряжений на поверхности "кость - имплантант"
- Adam J. G., Kerry A. D., Logan E. M., Joel D. S. Injury prediction in a side impact crash using human body model simulation // Accident Analysis and Prevention. — 2013. — Vol. 64, no. 14. — P. 1—8. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.026
- Alipal J., Lee T. C., Koshy P., Abdullah H. Z., Idris, M. I. Evolution of anodised titanium for implant applications // Heliyon - 2021. - Vol. 7, no. 7. DOI: 10.1016/j.heli-yon.2021.e07408
- Asa'ad F., Pelanyte G., Philip J., Dahlin C., Larsson L. The Role of Epigenetic Functionalization of Implants and Biomaterials in Osseointegration and Bone Regeneration-A Review // Molecules. - 2020. - Vol. 25, no. 24. DOI: 10.3 390/molecules2524 5879
- Bachiri A., Djebbar N., Boutabout B., Serier B. Effect of different impactor designs on biomechanical behavior in the interface bone-implant: A comparative biomechanics study // Computer Methods and Programme in Biomedicine. - 2020. -Vol. 197. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105723
- Bránemark P.I., Zarb G.A., Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry // Chicago: Quintessence. -1985. - Vol. 35, no. 4. - P. 259-265.
- Chacun D., Lafon A., Courtois N., Reveron H., Chevalier J., Margossian P., Grosgogeat B. Histologic and histomorpho-metric evaluation of new zirconia-based ceramic dental implants: A preclinical study in dogs // Dental Materials. - 2021. - Vol. 37, no. 9. - P. 1377-1389. DOI: 10.1016/j.den-tal.2021.06.010
- Cyrus A., Hamid R. E., Javad H., Jaber G. S. Effect of using different metal and ceramic materials as restorations on stress distribution around dental implants: a comparative finite element study // Materials Research Express. - 2018. - Vol. 5, no. 11. - P. 1-12. D0I:10.1088/2053-1591/aadc55
- Djebbar N., Bachiri A., Boutabout B. Comparison of Stress Distribution in Surrounding Bone during Insertion of Dental Implants on Four Implant Threads under the Effect of an Impact: A Finite Element Study //Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. - 2022. - Vol. 54. - P. 89-101. DOI: 10.4028/www. scientific.net/JBBBE.54.89
- Djebbar N., Serier B., Bachir Bouiadjra B. Finite element analysis in static and dynamic behaviors of dental prosthesis // Structural Engineering and Mechanics. - 2015. - Vol. 55, no. 1. - P. 65-78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.L065
- Djebbar N., Serier B., Benbarek S., Boutabout B. The Effect of the Projectile Shape on the Stress Biomechanical Behavior of Dental Implant: Three-dimensional Analysis // Periodica Polytechnica, Mechanical Engineering. - 2019. - Vol. 64, no. 4. - P. 249-256. DOI: 10.3311/PPme.12580
- Ferraris S., Spriano S., Lorenzon G. Intraoral welding of titanium dental implants: Characterization of the joints // Journal of Materials Processing Technology. - 2016. - Vol. 91, no. 12. - P. 85-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.018
- Gao X., Fraulob M., Haiat G. Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review // Journal of the Royal Society Interface. - 2019. - Vol. 16, no. 156. DOI:10.1098/rsif.2019.0259
- García-Minguillán G., Del Río J., Preciado A., Lynch C. D., Castillo-Oyagüe R. Impact of the retention system of implant fixed dental restorations on the peri-implant health, state of the prosthesis, and patients, oral health-related quality of life // Journal of Dentistry. - 2020. - Vol. 94, no. 18. - P. 1-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103298
- Gok K., Inal S., Urtekin L., Gok A. (2019). Biomechanical performance using finite element analysis of different screw materials in the parallel screw fixation of Salter-Harris Type 4 fractures // Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. - 2019. - Vol. 41, no. 3. DOI: 10.1007/s40430-019-1640-z.
- Hsu J.T., Huang H.L., Chang C.H. Relationship of three-dimensional bone-to-implant contact to primary implant stability and peri-implant bone strain in immediate loading: micro-computed tomographic and in vitro analyses // Int J Oral Max-illofac Implants. - 2013. - Vol. 28, no. 2. - P. 367-374. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2407
- Hyeonjong L., Minhye J., Gunwoo N. Biomechanical effects of dental implant diameter, connection type, and bone density on microgap formation and fatigue failure: A finite element analysis // Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. - 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105863
- Ismail N. F., Islam M. S., Shuib S., Ahmad R., Shahmin M. A. Influence of Dental Implant Design on Stress Distribution and Micromotion of Mandibular Bone // Applied Mechanics and Materials. - 2020. - Vol. 899. - P. 81-93. DOI: 10.402 8/www. scientific .net/amm.899. 81
- Javed F., Lau J., Delgado-Ruiz R., Romanos G. E. In-vitro evaluation of the primary stability of multiple condensing thread designed implants placed by novice and experienced clinicians // Surgery in Practice and Science. - 2020. - Vol. 2. DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2020.100014
- Joshi S., Dhatrak P., Nimbalkar S., Gherde C. (2020). An effect of various parameters on insertion torque to improve the success rate of dental implantation: A review // Materials Today: Proceedings. - 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.222
- Karine B. G., Philippe B., Thomas R., Francois B., In vivo experiments for the biomechanical analysis of emergency situations // Conference: Scientific Day of the French College of Traffic Medicine. - 2015. - At Ensam. - Paris. - France.
- Khosravani M. R. Behavior of restorative dental composites under various loading conditions // Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. - 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.02.009
- Laura G., John P. S., Teja G., Joo L. Current trends in dental implants // Journal Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. -2014. - Vol.40, no. 2. - P. 50-60. DOI:10.5125/jka-oms.2014.40.2.50
- Li J., Jansen J. A., Walboomers X. F., van den Beucken J. J. Mechanical aspects of dental implants and osseointegration: A narrative review // Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. - 2020. - Vol. 103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103574
- Liaw J. J. L., Shih I. Y. H., Yang S. Y. H., Tsai F.-F., Wang S.-H. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation for mutilated dentition with mini-implants, autotransplants, and a dental implant // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.08.019
- Lim J., Dobrev I., Roosli C., Stenfelt S., Kim N. Development of a finite element model of a human head including auditory periphery for understanding of bone-conducted hearing // Hearing Research. - 2021. - Vol. 108337. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108337
- Linetskiy I., Demenko V., Linetska L., Yefremov O. Impact of annual bone loss and different bone quality on dental implant success - A finite element study // Computers in Biology and Medicine. - 2017. - Vol. 91. - P .318-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.09.016
- Mamatmusaeva N., Tillaeva U., Daminov B., Saidkhodjaeva S., Iskandarov M., Malyugina O., Kuznecov I., Ponomarev A. Biocompatibility as an Important Component of Dental Materials // Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. - 2021. - Vol. 53. - P. 31-39. DOI: 10.402 8/www. scientific .net/JBBBE .53.31
- Maria M., Enrico C., Tiziano T., Marco B. Shock Absorption Capacity of Restorative Materials for Dental Implant Prostheses: An In Vitro Study // The International journal of prostho-dontics. - 2013. - Vol. 26, no. 6. - P. 549-556. DOI:10.11607/ijp.3241
- Micelli A. L. P., Nigro F., Mucsi C. S., Cavalieri M., Aranha L. C., Rossi J. L. Analysis of the Pullout Testing of Straight and Angled Abutments in Narrow Diameter Implants // Materials Science Forum. - 2020. - Vol. 1012. - P. 461-465. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ms
- Mijiritsky E., Mazor Z., Lorean A., Levin L. Implant diameter and length influence on survival: interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer // Implant Dentistry. - 2013. - Vol. 22, no. 4. - P. 394-398. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829afac0
- Mirzaie T., Rouhi G., Mehdi Dehghan M., Farzad-Mohajeri S., Barikani H. Dental implant's stability dependence on rotational speed and feed-rate of drilling: In-vivo and ex-vivo investigations // Journal of Biomechanics. - 2021. - Vol. 127. DOI: 10.1016/j .jbiomech.2021.110696
- Mohammadi B., Abdoli Z., Anbarzadeh E. Investigation of the Effect of Abutment Angle Tolerance on the Stress Created in the Fixture and Screw in Dental Implants Using Finite Element Analysis // Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. - 2021. - Vol. 51. - P. 63-76. DOI: 10.402 8/www. scientific. net/ JBBBE.51.63.
- Mohlhenrich S. C., Heussen N., Loberg C., Goloborodko E., Holzle F., Modabber A. Three - Dimensional Evaluation of Implant Bed Preparation and the Influence on Primary Implant Stability After Using 2 Different Surgical Techniques // Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. - 2015. - Vol. 73, no. 9. - P. 1723-1732. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.071
- Mussarat S. D. A Prospective Analysis, of Maxillofacial Injuries in Patients Reporting to a tertiary care hospital in Lahore // Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. - 2015. -Vol. 9, no. 1. - P. 314-317.
- NarendraKumar U., Mathew A. T., Lyer N., Rahman F., Manjubala I. A 3D Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Varying Thread Angles // Materials Today: Proceedings. - 2018. - Vol. 5, no. 5. - P. 11900-11905. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.163
- Pant A., Paul E., Niebur G. L., Vahdati A. Integration of mechanics and biology in computer simulation of bone remodeling // Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. - 2021. - Vol. 164. - P. 33-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbio-molbio.2021.05.001
- Pérez-Pevida E., Brizuela-Velasco A., Chávarri-Prado D., Diéguez-Pereira M., Jiménez-Garrudo A., Montalbán-Vadillo O., Santamaría-Arrieta G. Influence of time on primary stability of dental implants placed with osteotomes due to the elastic properties of peri-implant bone // Journal of Dental Sciences. -2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.04.004
- Pirmoradian M., Naeeni H. A., Firouzbakht M., Toghraie D., khabaz M. K., Darabi R. Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation on stress distribution and sensitivity of dental implants to assess optimum length and thread pitch // Computer Methods and Programme in Biomedicine. - 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105258
- Post A., Hoshizaki T. B., Gilchrist M. D., Brien S. E., Cusim-ano M. D., Marshall S. Traumatic brain injuries: The influence of the direction of impact // Journal of Neurosurg. - 2014. -Vol. 76, no. 1. - P. 81-91. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000554
- Pranav K., Namita K. A retrospective analysis of maxillofacial injuries in patients reporting to a tertiary care hospital in East Delhi // International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. - 2012. - Vol. 2, no. 1. - P. 6-10. D0I:10.4103/2229-5151.94872
- Putrantyo I., Anilbhai N., Vanjani R., De Vega B. Tantalum as a Novel Biomaterial for Bone Implant: A Literature Review // Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. - 2021. - Vol. 52. - P. 55-65. DOI: 10.402 8/www. scientific.net/JBBBE.52. 5 5
- Rohit S., LigiE. J., Dipika M., Silvia R., Priyanka M., Harshad V. How to begin with dental implants // International journal for research in health sciences and nursing. - 2018. - Vol. 4, no. 9. - P. 11-46. DOI: 10.29309/TPMJ/18.4677
- Sabzekar M., Namakin M., Babaki H. A. S., Deldari A., Ba-baiyan V. Dental implants success prediction by classifier ensemble on imbalanced data // Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. - 2021. - Vol. 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmp-bup.2021.100021
- Silva G. A. F., Faot F., da Silva W. J., Del Bel Cury A. A. Does implant surface hydrophilicity influence the maintenance of surface integrity after insertion into low-density artificial bone? // Dental Materials. - 2021. - Vol. 37, no. 2. - P. 69-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.10.024
- Soares P. B. F., Carvalho V. F., Verissimo C., Pessoa R. S., Versluis A., C. J. Mouthguard biomechanics for protecting dental implants from impact // Dental Materials. - 2018. - Vol. 34. - P. e112. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.233
- Sun F., Wang L., Li X.-C., Cheng W., Lin Z., Ba D.C., Sun C.-S. Effect of surface modification on the long-term stability of dental implant abutment screws by plasma nitriding treatment // Surface and Coatings Technology. - 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126089
- Yodrux A., Yodpijit N., Jongprasithporn M. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implant Threads // Applied Mechanics and Materials. - 2018. - Vol. 876. - P. 138-146. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/am
- Young E. J., Macias C. R., Stephens L. Common Dental In jury Management in Athletes // Sports Health A Multidiscipli-nary Approach. - 2013. - Vol. 7, no. 3. - P. 250-255. DOI :10.1177/1941738113486077