Video conferencing solutions for students - future teachers’ professional socialization

Автор: Nagovitsyn Roman S., Valeeva Roza A., Latypova Liliya A.

Журнал: Интеграция образования @edumag-mrsu

Рубрика: Психология образования

Статья в выпуске: 2 (107), 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. Despite the numerous publications on the implementation of distance technologies, there are practically no studies on the systematic analysis of various forms of video conferencing that support educational technologies and serve as a practical guide for teachers in teacher training. The purpose of the study is to analyze the experience of implementing video conferencing in various forms of interaction, to identify and experimentally test the effectiveness of their implementation in the process of professional socialization of student teachers. Materials and Methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the method of reflexive-system analysis of the implementation of video conferencing in the professional training of student teachers. Based on the questionnaire and the method of expert assessments, testing of the level of social and psychological adaptability, professional and behavioral skills, social and emotional comfort of students was implemented. The experiment involved 209 students of the Glazov State Pedagogical Institute and Kazan Federal University. Results. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the implementation of the group form of video conferencing significantly increases the involvement of almost all students in active communication activities in the classroom. Communication activity in the implementation of social and educational interaction between small and large groups made it possible to most effectively form professional socialization among students. Statistical analysis showed that it was classes in a remote format using video conferencing in subgroups of 4-5 students that had the greatest positive effect. Discussion and Conclusion. The conclusions made by the authors contribute to the development of new forms of effective communication through social and educational interaction in the implementation of video conferencing. The materials of the article can be useful in the implementation of teacher education to increase the level of studentsʼ involvement in professional training in the context of distance education.

Еще

Video conferencing, forms of interaction, professional socialization, student teachers, teacher education

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147237992

IDR: 147237992   |   DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.107.026.202202.229-246

Текст научной статьи Video conferencing solutions for students - future teachers’ professional socialization

Modern approaches to teaching imply the implementation of a pedagogical paradigm, where the center is the student himself and the results of his/her learning [1] that directly depend on the process of student interaction with each other in the educational space [2].

When training student teachers, it is important to develop interpersonal communication skills [3; 4] that will allow them to successfully carry out professional activities in the future as part of a teaching team at school, effectively implementing interaction with students and their parents [5]. Numerous stu- dies have revealed the effectiveness of various forms of student teachers’ professional training [1; 2; 6]. Nevertheless, in the practice of teacher education, there are no experimental studies on how teachers can implement various forms of interaction in the context of distance learning for the effective formation of professional socialization of students. A hasty introduction of distance learning risks creating misconceptions on the part of students about the uselessness of such open and flexible learning, as well as distance learning education in general [7; 8]. In remote education without prior preparation, when communication problems among students are systematically manifested, users may mistakenly blame distance education for the failures in teaching [9; 10], rather than the poorquality communication strategy [11]. This, in turn, significantly depreciates the achievements of science over the past decade in the implementation of distance education both from educational and technological point of view [12; 13]. In teacher education this issue becomes even more acute due to the fact that for student teachers some key competencies serving as indicators of their professional socialization are the ability to work in a team, to implement effective communication of pupils in individual and full-class learning and educational activities [14; 15]. From this perspective, it is necessary to search for distance learning technologies that will maximally correspond to modern teacher education and will be effective in the educational process to increase the professional socialization of student teachers [16].

Список литературы Video conferencing solutions for students - future teachers’ professional socialization

  • Sherman Y. От «подрыва» к инновациям: о будущем МООК // Вопросы образования. 2018. № 4. С. 21-43. doi: http://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2018-4-21-43
  • Fostering Student Engagement through a Real-World, Collaborative Project across Disciplines and Institutions / L. Mebert [et al.] // Higher Education Pedagogies. 2020. Vol. 5, issue 1. P. 30-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1 080/23752696.2020.1750306
  • Crichton H., Templeton B. Collaboration or Confrontation? An Investigation into the Role of Prior Experiences in the Completion of Collaborative Group Tasks by Student Teachers // European Journal of Teacher Education. 2013. Vol. 36, issue 1. P. 84-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.678487
  • Valeeva R., Kalimullin A. Teacher Education in Russia [Электронный ресурс] // Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.446
  • Le H., Janssen J., Wubbels T. Collaborative Learning Practices: Teacher and Student Perceived Obstacles to Effective Student Collaboration // Cambridge Journal of Education. 2018. Vol. 48, issue 1. P. 103-122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  • Пинская М. А., Пономарева А. А., Косарецкий С. Г. Профессиональное развитие и подготовка молодых учителей в России // Вопросы образования. 2016. № 2. С. 100-124. URL: https://vo.hse.ru/ data/2016/06/28/1115860975/Pinskaya.pdf (дата обращения: 20.09.2021).
  • Bozkurt A., Sharma R.C. Emergency Remote Teaching in a Time of Global Crisis due to Corona Virus Pandemic // Asian Journal of Distance Education. 2020. Vol. 15, issue 1. P. i-vi. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.3778083
  • Naidu S. It is the Worst - and the Best - of Times! // Distance Education. 2020. Vol. 41, issue 4. P. 425-428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1825929
  • Adedoyin O. B., Soykan E. COVID-19 Pandemic and Online Learning: The Challenges and Opportunities // Interactive Learning Environments. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180 (In Press.)
  • Bonk C. J. Bonk C.J. Pandemic Ponderings, 30 Years to Today: Synchronous Signals, Saviours, or Survivors? // Distance Education. 2020. Vol. 41, issue 4. P. 589-599. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1 821610
  • Thompson A. D., Lindstrom D., Schmidt-Crawford D. A. COVID-19 Era: A Time for Us to Lead! // Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 2020. Vol. 36, issue 4. P. 204-205. doi: https://doi.org/10.108 0/21532974.2020.1813238
  • Al-Samarraie H. A Scoping Review of Videoconferencing Systems in Higher Education: Learning Paradigms, Opportunities, and Challenges // International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2019. Vol. 20, issue 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4037
  • Poth R. D. Connecting Technology and Pedagogy // Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 2019. Vol. 35, issue 3. P. 124-125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1622916
  • Digital Competences for Teacher Professional Development. Systematic Review / J. M. Fernández-Batanero [et al.] // European Journal of Teacher Education. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.20 20.1827389 (In Press.)
  • Hager K. D. Integrating Technology to Improve Teacher Preparation // College Teaching. 2020. Vol. 68, issue 2. P. 71-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1723475
  • Implications for European Physical Education Teacher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-institutional SWOT Analysis / W. O'Brien [et al.] // European Journal of Teacher Education. 2020. Vol. 43, issue 4. P. 503-522. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1823963
  • Virtually in This Together - How Web-Conferencing Systems Enabled A New Virtual Togetherness during the COVID-19 Crisis / J. Hacker [et al.] // European Journal of Information Systems. 2020. Vol. 29, issue 5. P. 563-584. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1814680
  • Студенты вузов России о дистанционном обучении: оценка и возможности / И. А. Алешковский [и др.] // Высшее образование в России. 2020. Т. 29, № 10. С. 86-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-86-100
  • Basaran B., Yalman M. Examining University Students' Attitudes towards Using Web-Conferencing Systems in Distance Learning Courses: A Study on Scale Development and Application // Knowledge Management and E-Learning. 2020. Vol. 12, no. 2. P. 209-230. doi: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2020.12.011
  • Kuo Y. C., Kuo Y. T. Preservice Teachers' Mobile Learning Experience: An Exploratory Study of iPad-Enhanced Collaborative Learning // Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 2020. Vol. 36, issue 2. P. 111-123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2020.1719380
  • Михайлов О. В., Денисова Я. В. Дистанционное обучение в российских университетах: «шаг вперед, два шага назад»? // Высшее образование в России. 2020. Т. 29, № 10. С. 65-76. doi: https://doi. org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-65-76
  • Student Assessment of Online Tools to Foster Engagement during the COVID-19 Quarantine / K. R. Lima [et al.] // Advances in Physiology Education. 2020. Vol. 44, issue 4. P. 679-683. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/ advan.00131.2020
  • Correia A., Liu C., Xu F. Evaluating Videoconferencing Systems for the Quality of the Educational Experience // Distance Education. 2020. Vol. 41, issue 4. P. 429-452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607
  • Utilizing Zoom Breakout Rooms to Expose Preclerkship Medical Students to TeleMedicine Encounters / J. Rucker [et al.] // Medical Science Educator. 2020. Vol. 30, issue 4. P. 1359-1360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40670-020-01113-w
  • Almomani J. A., Alnasraween M. S., Almosa N. A. Evaluating the Distance University Education Experience after Using the Zoom Application in Jordan from the Student's Point of View // Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2020. Vol. 8, no. 11B. P. 6239-6247. doi: https://doi.org/10.13189/ ujer.2020.082262
  • Цифровое поведение и особенности мотивационной сферы интернет-пользователей: логико-категориальный анализ / И. Н. Погожина [и др.] // Вопросы образования. 2020. № 3. С. 60-94. doi: https://doi. org/10.17323/1814-9545-2020-3-60-94
  • Model of the System of Raising the Social Status of the Teacher in the Region on the Basis of a Pedagogical University / R. S. Nagovitsyn [et al.] // European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2019. Vol. 8, issue 2. P. 315-327. doi: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2019.2.315
  • Festinger L. Reflections on How to Study and Understand the Human-Being // Social Research. 1995. Vol. 62, issue 1. P. 173-174.
  • Merckelbach H., Merten T. A Note on Cognitive Dissonance and Malingering // The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2012. Vol. 26, issue 7. P. 1217-1229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2012.710252
  • Metzger M. J., Hartsell E. H., Flanagin A. J. Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News // Communication Research. 2020. Vol. 47, issue 1. P. 3-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136
  • Schmeichel B. J., Vohs K. D., Baumeister R. F. Intellectual Performance and Ego Depletion: Role of the Self in Logical Reasoning and Other Information Processing // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003. Vol. 85, issue 1. P. 33-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.85.1.33
  • Goldberg L. S., Grandey A. A. Display Rules Versus Display Autonomy: Emotion Regulation, Emotional Exhaustion, and Task Performance in a Call Center Simulation // Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2007. Vol. 12, issue 3. P. 301-318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.301
  • Elliot A. J., Devine P. G. On the Motivational Nature of Cognitive-Dissonance - Dissonance as Psychological Discomfort // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994. Vol. 67, issue 3. P. 382-394. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382
  • Hulett J. E. Review of Psychotherapy and Personality Change: Co-ordinated Research Studies in the Client-centered Approach by C. R. Rogers, R. F. Dymond // American Sociological Review. 1955. Vol. 20, issue 3. P. 369-370. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2087424
  • Cognitive Dissonance in Social Work / S. Burke [et al.] // Journal of Public Child Welfare. 2017. Vol. 11, issue 3. P. 299-317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2016.1278068
  • Corcoran R. P., O'Flaherty J. Executive Function during Teacher Preparation // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2017. Vol. 63. P. 168-175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.023
  • The Relationship of Hardiness and Some Other Relevant Variables to College Performance / S. R. Maddi [et al.] // Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 2012. Vol. 52, issue 2. P. 190-205. doi: https://doi. org/10.1177/0022167811422497
  • What Makes a Good Teacher? The Relative Importance of Mathematics Teachers' Cognitive Ability, Personality, Knowledge, Beliefs, and Motivation for Instructional Quality / F. Baier [et al.] // British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2019. Vol. 89, issue 4. P. 767-786. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12256
  • How Does the Learning Environment in Teacher Education Cultivate First Year Student Teachers' Sense of Professional Agency in the Professional Community? / A. Toom [et al.] // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2017. Vol. 63. P. 126-136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.013
  • Kalman C. S., Lattery M. Editorial: Development of Student Understanding: Focus on Science Education // Frontiers in Psychology. 2019. Vol. 10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02861
  • Stepanchenko N., Briskin Y. Dispositional Factors of Personality Professional Development of the Future Teachers of Physical Education and Sport // Physical Education of Students. 2019. Vol. 23, no. 4. P. 202-208. doi: https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2019.0407
  • Avdeeva M., Tulyakova O. Indicated Factors of Physical Development, Physical Readiness, Functional Condition and Efficiency of Female Students in the Process of Adaptation to Training // Physical Education of Students. 2018. Vol. 22, no. 1. P. 4-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2018.0101
  • Shawer S. F. Teacher-Driven Curriculum Development at the Classroom Level: Implications for Curriculum, Pedagogy and Teacher Training // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2017. Vol. 63. P. 296-313. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.017
  • Hammerness K., Klette K. Indicators of Quality in Teacher Education: Looking at Features of Teacher Education from an International Perspective // International Perspectives on Education and Society. 2015. Vol. 27. P. 239-277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920140000027013
  • Formation of Social Tolerance among Future Teachers / R. S. Nagovitsyn, D. K. Bartosh, A. Y. Ratsimor, Y. G. Maksimov // European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2018. Vol. 7, issue 4. P. 754-763. doi: https:// doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.4.754
  • Carpenter C. J. Cognitive Dissonance, Ego-Involvement, and Motivated Reasoning // Annals of the International Communication Association. 2019. Vol. 43, issue 1. P. 1-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2380898 5.2018.1564881
  • Klassen R. M., Tze V. M. C. Teachers' Self-Efficacy, Personality, and Teaching Effectiveness: A Metaanalysis // Educational Research Review. 2014. Vol. 12. P. 59-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
  • Roth J. J., Pierce M., Brewer S. Performance and Satisfaction of Resident and Distance Students in Videoconference Courses // Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 2020. Vol. 31, issue 2. P. 296-310. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2020.1726423
  • Трансформация обучения в высшей школе во время пандемии: болевые точки / И. Р. Гафуров [и др.] // Высшее образование в России. 2020. Т. 29, № 10. С. 101-112. doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-101-112
Еще
Статья научная