Virtual reality or video-based self-instruction: comparing the learning outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training
Автор: Qingyang Tang, Qian Liu, Ziwei Liu, Shen Jiang
Рубрика: Цифровизация в образовании
Статья в выпуске: 2 т.13, 2021 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Most of the existing virtual reality (VR) Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) self-instruction training methods are based on low embodied and noninteractive 360-degree videos, and the effects of the highly immersive embodied VR CPR training system lack rigorous experimental verification. In our study, we compare the learning outcomes of self-instruction CPR training based on a highly immersive and interactive VR system (experimental group) with self-instruction training based on 2D videos (control group) in terms of willingness to perform CPR, knowledge of CPR, self-efficacy and CPR test performances. We conducted a prepost between-group experiment in a local college in Yixin, Jiangsu Province, China. Sixty undergraduate students (30 male and 30 female) aged from 18 to 25 were randomly assigned to the video group or the VR group. There were no significant differences in demographic variables and baseline pre-test between the two groups. Both groups received training on cardiac compressions and automated external defibrillator (AED) assisted CPR. Our results revealed that both the VR and video methods significantly improved the participants’ CPR knowledge, self-efficacy and willingness to perform CPR. Our results showed that the immersive VR group had a significant disadvantage in their grasp of compression depth compared with the non-immersive media group. The correct compression depth of the video group was significantly higher than the VR group, and there was no difference between the two groups in terms of compression speed and full rebound rate. Our study suggested that both self-instruction training based on VR and self-instruction training based on video were effective methods, and the highly immersive and embodied VR method did not achieve better results than the video method.
Cardiac arrest, self-instruction training, basic life support, virtual reality, motion tracking technology, video, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, college students
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147234029
IDR: 147234029 | DOI: 10.14529/ped210205
Список литературы Virtual reality or video-based self-instruction: comparing the learning outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training
- Abella B.S., Aufderheide T.P., Eigel B. Reducing Barriers for Implementation of Bystander-initiated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association for Healthcare Providers, Policymakers, and Community Leaders Regarding the Effectiveness of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, 2008, no. 117 (5), pp. 704-709. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188486
- Almousa O., Prates J., Yeslam N., Mac Gregor D., Zhang J., Phan V., Nielsen M., Smith R., Qayumi K. Virtual Reality Simulation Technology for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: An Innovative Hybrid System With Haptic Feedback. Simulation and Gaming, 2019, no. 50 (1), pp. 6-22. DOI: 10.1177/104687811 8820905
- Baldi E., Contri E., Savastano S., Corte-giani A. The Challenge of Laypeople Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation Training During and After COVID-19 Pandemic. Resuscitation, 2020, no. 152, pp. 3-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation. 2020.04.040
- Boada I., Rodriguez-Benitez A., GarciaGonzalez J.M., Olivet J., Carreras V., Sbert M. Using a Serious Game to Complement CPR Instruction in a Nurse Faculty. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 2015, no. 122 (2), pp. 282-291. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.08.006
- £akiroglu Ü., Gokoglu S. Development of Fire Safety Behavioral Skills Via Virtual Reality. Comput Educ., 2019, no. 133, pp. 56-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.014
- Cerezo E.C., Segura M.F, Melendre-ras R.R. Virtual Reality in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: a Randomized Trial. Emergencias, 2019, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 43-46.
- Chen Z.Q., Zhao Y., Lu Z.H., Li X.Y. Awareness and Attitudes of Chinese Students Towards Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Emergency Medicine Journal, 2010, no. 27 (12), pp. 907-910. DOI: 10.1136/emj.2009.079558
- Dede C. Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning. Science, 2009, no. 323 (5910), pp. 66-69. DOI: 10.1126/science.1167311
- Einspruch E.L., Lynch B., Aufderheide T.P., Nichol G., Becker L. Retention of CPR Skills Learned in a Taditional AHA Heart-saver Course Versus 30-min Video Self-training: A Controlled Randomized Study. Resuscitation, 2007, no. 74 (3), pp. 476-486. DOI: 10.1016/j. resuscitation.2007.01.030
- Gu X.M., Li Z.H., He Z., Zhao Z.W., Liu S.Q. A Meta-analysis of the Success Rates of Heartbeat Restoration within the Platinum 10 min Among Outpatients Suffering from Sudden Cardiac Arrest in China. Mil Med Res, 2016, no. 3 (1), pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-016-0071-8
- Howard M., Lee J. Pre-training Interventions to Counteract Seductive Details in Virtual Reality Training Programs. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2019, no. 31 (1), pp. 13-29. DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.21378
- Hua W., Zhang L.F., Wu Y.F. Incidence of Sudden Cardiac Death in China. Analysis of 4 Regional Populations. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol, 2009, no. 54 (12), pp. 1110-1118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.016
- Leary M., McGovern S.K., Chaud-hary Z., Patel J., Abella B.S., Blewer A.L. Comparing Bystander Response to a Sudden Cardiac Arrest Using a Virtual Reality CPR Training Mobile APP Versus a Standard CPR Training Mobile APP. Resuscitation, 2019, no. 139, pp. 167-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.017
- Liu Q., Wang Y., Tang Q., Liu Z. Do You Feel the Same as I Do? Differences in Virtual Reality Technology Experience and Acceptance Between Elderly Adults and College Students. Front. Psychol, 2020. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573673
- Lynch B., Einspruch E.L., Nichol G., Becker L.B., Aufderheide T.P., Idris A. Effectiveness of a 30-min CPR Self-instruction Program for Lay Responders: A Controlled Randomized Study. Resuscitation, 2005, no. 67 (1), pp. 31-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.04.017
- Makransky G., Andreasen N., Bacevi-ciute S., Mayer R. Immersive Virtual Reality Increases Liking but not Learning with a Science Simulation and Generative Learning Strategies Promote Learning in Immersive Virtual Reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000473
- Meyer O.A., Omdahl M.K., Makran-sky G. Investigating the Effect of Pre-training when Learning through Immersive Virtual Reality and Video: A Media and Methods Experiment. Comput Educ, 2019, no. 140. DOI: 10.1016/ j.compedu.2019.103603
- Moreno R., Mayer R.E. Learning Science in Virtual Reality Multimedia Environments: Role of Methods and Media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2002, no. 94 (3), pp. 598-610. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.598
- Nas J., Thannhauser J., Vart P. Effect of Face-to-Face vs Virtual Reality Training on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality. JAMA Cardiology, 2019. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio. 2019.4992
- Roppolo L.P., Saunders T., Pepe P.E., Idris A.H. Layperson Training for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: When Less is Better. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2007, no. 13 (3), pp. 256-260. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32814db81f
- Semeraro F., Frisoli A., Loconsole C. Kids (Learn How to) Save Lives in the School with the Serious Game Relive. Resuscitation, 2017, no. 116, pp. 27-32. DOI: 10.1016/ j.resuscitation.2017.04.038
- Semeraro F., Ristagno G., Giulini G. Virtual Reality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR): Comparison with a Standard CPR Training Mannequin. Resuscitation, 2019, no. 135, pp. 234-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018. 12.016
- Semeraro F., Scapigliati A., Ristagno G. Virtual Reality for CPR training: How Cool is That? Dedicated to the "Next Generation". Resuscitation, 2017, no. 121. DOI: 10.1016/ j.resuscitation.2017.09.024
- Shi J., Gan Y., Jiang N. The Global Survival Rate Among Adult Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients who Received Cardiopulmo-nary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Crit Care, 2020.
- Shu Y., Huang Y.Z., Chang S.H., Chen M.Y. Do Virtual Reality Head-mounted Displays Make a Difference? A Comparison of Presence and Self-efficacy between Head-mounted Displays and Desktop Computer-facilitated Virtual Environments. Virtual Real, 2019, no. 23 (4), pp. 437-446. DOI: 10.1007/ s10055-018-0376-x
- Sweller J. Cognitive Load theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design. Learn Instr, 1994, no. 4 (4), pp. 295-312. DOI: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
- Wong M., Chue S., Jong M., Benny H., Zary N. Clinical Instructors' Perceptions of Virtual Reality in Health Professionals' Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation Education. SAGE Open Medicine, 2018, no. 6. DOI: 10.1177/ 2050312118799602
- Xu F., Zhang Y., Chen Y. Cardiopul-monary Resuscitation Training in China: Current Situation and Future Development. JAMA Cardiol, 2017, no. 2 (5), pp. 469-470. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0035
- Yan S., Gan Y., Wang R., Song X., Zhou N., Lv C. Willingness to Attend Cardi-opulmonary Resuscitation Training and the Associated Factors Among Adults in China. Crit Care, 2020, no. 24 (1), pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.1186/ s13054-020-03165-1
- Yeung J., Kovic I., Vidacic M. The School Lifesavers Study-A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of Lifesaver Only, Face-to-face Training Only, and Lifesaver with Face-to-face Training on CPR Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes in UK School Children. Resuscitation, 2017, no. 120, pp. 138-145. DOI: 10.1016/ j.resuscitation.2017.08.010
- Yoon W., Ro Y., Cho S. A Mediation Analysis of the Effect of Practical Training on the Relationship between Demographic Factors, and Bystanders' Self-efficacy in CPR Performance. PLoS One, 2019, no. 14 (4), pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215432
- Zhu X., Wu G. VR CPR is Coming! The Country's First First-aid Virtual Training System was Unveiled in Nanjing. Jiangsu Broadcasting Media Press Center, 2018. Available at: http://news.jstv.com/a720180324/1521892326871. shtml (accessed 25.12.2020).