Влияние реактивной и проактивной стратегии принятия моторного решения на особенности кинематики руки у пациентов после инсульта

Автор: Тумялис А.В., Иванов Т.Б., Иванова Г.Е., Иванова Е.А., Кириченко А.А., Осадчий А.Е.

Журнал: Клиническая практика @clinpractice

Рубрика: Оригинальные исследования

Статья в выпуске: 1 т.15, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Обоснование. После инсульта часто развиваются двигательные нарушения верхних конечностей. Использование традиционных методов восстановления моторных функций верхних конечностей не всегда эффективно и оставляет актуальным вопрос о поиске и разработке новых реабилитационных подходов. В качестве такого подхода мы предлагаем использовать проактивный выбор целенаправленного движения. Цель исследования - изучить влияние различных стратегий регуляции движения верхних конечностей на принятие моторного решения и параметры кинематики руки у пациентов с постинсультным парезом руки.

Инсульт, спастичность, движение рукой, моторное принятие решения

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/143182763

IDR: 143182763   |   DOI: 10.17816/clinpract624222

Список литературы Влияние реактивной и проактивной стратегии принятия моторного решения на особенности кинематики руки у пациентов после инсульта

  • Kuo CL, Hu GC. Post-stroke spasticity: A review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatments. Int J Gerontol. 2018;12(4): 280–284. doi: 10.1016/j.ijge.2018.05.005
  • Collins KC, Kennedy NC, Clark A, et al. Kinematic components of the reach-to-target movement after stroke for focused rehabilitation interventions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2018;9:472. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00472
  • Ramos-Lima MJ, Brasileiro IC, Lima TL, et al. Quality of life after stroke: Impact of clinical and sociodemographic factors. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018;73:e418. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017/e418
  • Schweighofer N, Han CE, Wolf SL, et al. A functional threshold for long-term use of hand and arm function can be determined: Predictions from a computational model and supporting data from the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial. Phys Ther. 2009;89(12):1327–1336. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080402
  • Li S, Francisco GE, Rymer WZ. A new definition of poststroke spasticity and the interference of spasticity with motor recovery from acute to chronic stages. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35(7):601–610. doi: 10.1177/15459683211011214
  • Mawase F, Cherry-Allen K, Xu J, et al. Pushing the rehabilitation boundaries: Hand motor impairment can be reduced in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020;34(8):733–745. doi: 10.1177/1545968320939563
  • Levin MF, Piscitelli D. Motor control: A conceptual framework for rehabilitation. Motor Control. 2022;26(4):497–517. doi: 10.1123/mc.2022-0026
  • Cirstea MC, Mitnitski AB, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2003;151(3):289–300. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1438-0
  • Lackritz H, Parmet Y, Frenkel-Toledo S, et al. Effect of post-stroke spasticity on voluntary movement of the upper limb. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00876-6
  • Pellegrino L, Coscia M, Giannoni P, et al. Stroke impairs the control of isometric forces and muscle activations in the ipsilesional arm. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):18533. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96329-0
  • Thibaut A, Chatelle C, Ziegler E, et al. Spasticity after stroke: Physiology, assessment and treatment. Brain Inj. 2013; 27(10):1093–1105. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.804202
  • Hatem SM, Saussez G, Della Faille M, et al. Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: A multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:442. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442
  • Sherwood DE, Lohse KR, Healy AF. The effect of an external and internal focus of attention on dual-task performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020;46(1):91–104. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000698
  • Kuhn YA, Keller M, Egger S, et al. Effects of an external compared to an internal focus of attention on the excitability of fast and slow(er) motor pathways. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):17910. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97168-9
  • Hutchison KA, Bugg JM, Lim YB, et al. Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016;78(4):1087–1103. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1066-y
  • Yu Q, Chau BK, Lam BY, et al. Neural processes of proactive and reactive controls modulated by motor-skill experiences. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:404. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00404
  • Sternberg S. Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001;106(1-2):147–246. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00045-7
  • Pierella C, Casadio M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Solla SA. The dynamics of motor learning through the formation of internal models. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15(12):e1007118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007118
  • Inzlicht M, Shenhav A, Olivola CY. The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018;22(4):337–349. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007
  • Turpin NA, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Stretch-reflex threshold modulation during active elbow movements in post-stroke survivors with spasticity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(10): 1891–1897. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.07.411
  • Tandonnet C, Davranche K, Meynier C, et al. How does temporal preparation speed up response implementation in choice tasks? Evidence for an early cortical activation. Psychophysiology. 2012;49(2):252–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01301.x
  • Shin YK, Proctor RW. Evidence for distinct steps in response preparation from a delayed response paradigm. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018;191:42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.08.010
  • Herz DM, Zavala BA, Bogacz R, Brown P. Neural correlates of decision thresholds in the human subthalamic nucleus. Curr Biol. 2016;26(7):916–920. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.051
  • Stine GM, Trautmann EM, Jeurissen D, Shadlen MN. A neural mechanism for terminating decisions. Neuron. 2023;111(16):2601–2613.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.05.028
  • Faisal AA, Wolpert DM. Near optimal combination of sensory and motor uncertainty in time during a naturalistic perception-action task. J Neurophysiol. 2009;101(4):1901–1912. doi: 10.1152/jn.90974.2008
  • Sengupta S, Medendorp WP, Praamstra P, Selen LP. Uncertainty modulated exploration in the trade-off between sensing and acting. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0199544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199544
  • Subramanian SK, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Spasticity may obscure motor learning ability after stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2018; 119(1):5–20. doi: 10.1152/jn.00362.2017
Еще
Статья научная