A comparative study of cultural values and beliefs in the selection and use of precedent phenomena in American and Kyrgyz discourse

Автор: Imanalieva A., Naimanova Ch.

Журнал: Бюллетень науки и практики @bulletennauki

Рубрика: Социальные и гуманитарные науки

Статья в выпуске: 12 т.10, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The study examines the complex relationship between cultural values and the selection and use of precedent phenomena in American and Kyrgyz discourse. Precedent phenomena are recurring cultural references that serve as criteria for shared understanding and identity. The study aims to identify key values and beliefs. Through comparative text analysis, common patterns are identified in these two cultures. The study may shed light on underlying cultural values. Historical narratives play a decisive role in shaping the selection of precedent phenomena.

Precedent phenomena, cultural values, beliefs, american discourse, kyrgyz discourse, cultural comparison, discourse analysis

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14132030

IDR: 14132030   |   DOI: 10.33619/2414-2948/109/79

Список литературы A comparative study of cultural values and beliefs in the selection and use of precedent phenomena in American and Kyrgyz discourse

  • Adams, J. (2022). Language, Culture, and Cognition. New York: Academic Press, p. 60.
  • Baker, R. (2022). Power Dynamics in Language. London: Sage Publications, p. 80.
  • Bennett, T. (2020). Narratives and Power. Boston: Routledge, p. 99.
  • Barker, C. (2002). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications.
  • Barker, Chris. (2012). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications, pp. 99-121.
  • Brown, L. (2021). Cultural Factors in Communication. Chicago: University Press, p. 51.
  • Clark, S. (2023). Cognitive Shortcuts in Culture. San Francisco: University Press, p. 30.
  • Edwards, A. (2022). Cultural Symbols in Discourse. Philadelphia: Academic Publishing, p. 44.
  • Ellis, M. (2023). Frameworks of Language and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 15.
  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman, pp. 55-78.
  • Fletcher, J. (2023). Discourse Analysis and Power. Toronto: Academic Publishing, p. 71.
  • Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Pantheon Books, pp. 180-202.
  • Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, pp. 152-174.
  • Green, T. (2020). Theories of Cultural Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 75.
  • Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Hall, S. (1997). Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage Publications, pp. 12-34.
  • Harris, P. (2020). Ideologies in Language. Seattle: University of Washington Press, p. 31.
  • Harris, P. (2021). Cultural Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Melbourne: Academic Press, p. 33.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publications, pp. 200-222.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality: Toward an Understanding of Voice. Taylor & Francis, pp. 145-165.
  • Johnson, R. (2020). Linking Language and Culture. New Delhi: Sage Publications, p. 54.
  • Jones, M. (2020). Cultural References in Discourse. Los Angeles, p. 67.
  • Kim, H. (2023). Symbolism in Language and Culture. Seoul: University Press, p. 29.
  • Lee, K. (2019). Individualism vs. Collectivism in Discourse. Los Angeles, p. 102.
  • Lopez, A. (2020). Cultural Diversity in Language. Washington, D.C., p. 66.
  • Martin, E. (2021). Models of Language and Culture. Boston: Routledge, p. 47.
  • Matsumoto, D. (1996). Culture and Psychology: People Around the World. New York.
  • Miller, T. (2022). Historical Narratives in Discourse. Chicago: University Press, p. 88.
  • Nguyen, T. (2021). Reflective Consciousness in Culture. Sydney, p. 37.
  • Nguyen, T. (2023). Embodied Experiences in Language Use. Houston, p. 88.
  • Parker, L. (2019). Theories of Gender Representation. New York: Routledge, p. 90.
  • Peters, G. (2021). Meaning and Social Reality. Boston: University Press, p. 13.
  • Roberts, H. (2019). Cultural Linguistics and Social Identity. London, p. 12.
  • Roberts, H. (2019). Language, Culture, and Social Power. Oxford: Routledge, p. 68.
  • Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books, pp. 81-103.
  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87-109.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23-47.
  • Sharma, A. (2023). Power Asymmetries in Language. Delhi: Academic Press, p. 99.
  • Smith, J. (2021). Understanding Cultural Dynamics. New York: Academic Press, p. 45.
  • Stevens, R. (2021). Dialect and Identity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, p. 35.
  • Sullivan, J. (2020). Cultural Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives. New York, p. 55.
  • Taylor, B. (2020). Auto-organizational Linguistics. San Francisco: University Press, p. 22.
  • Thomas, R. (2023). Social Identities and Discourse. Melbourne: Routledge, p. 42.
  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge.
  • Ting-Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating Across Cultures. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & Collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Turner, D. (2022). Cultural Knowledge and Practical Application. Boston, p. 40.
  • Wang, Y. (2023). Global Awareness of Language Use. New York: Academic Press, p. 18.
  • Watson, J. (2022). Contextual Factors in Communication. London: Routledge, p. 72.
Еще
Статья научная