Аnonymous witness statements in the European Court of Human Rights – Is it possible to achieve the right to a fair trial?
Автор: Bojana Golubović
Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa @pravni-fakultet
Рубрика: Review paper
Статья в выпуске: 3 vol.41, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The purpose of this paper is to stimulate reflection on the use and significance of anonymous witness statements in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The analysis of selected leading cases in this area will provide an overview of the development of European judicial practice regarding the fact that the right of the defense is seriously compromised when such statements are accepted in criminal proceedings. A significant number of judgments represent a setback, particularly concerning the realization of the right to confrontation, which is characteristic of cases involving statements from anonymous witnesses. In such cases, the question arises as to what counterbalancing mechanisms could compensate for the denial of the accused’s rights when the identity of the individual providing incriminating statements is concealed. The statements of anonymous witnesses have, in a way, influenced the practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the establishment of a legal standard that has gradually taken on the role of a corrective mechanism, maintaining the balance between opposing parties. The question is whether such a corrective mechanism for the procedural protection of anonymous witnesses can preserve the interests of both sides.
Anonymous witnesses, European Court of Human Rights, right to a fair trial, anonymous witness statements, counterbalancing mechanism
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170205798
IDR: 170205798 | DOI: 10.5937/ptp2403170G
Список литературы Аnonymous witness statements in the European Court of Human Rights – Is it possible to achieve the right to a fair trial?
- Balsamo, A. (2006). Testimonianze anonime ed effettività delle garanzie sul terreno del diritto vivente nel processo di integrazione giuridica europea, Cassazione penale, 46(9), pp. 3007–3015
- Brkić, S. (2006). Anonimni svedoci u kontinentalnom pravu [Anonymous witness in the continental law] Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 40(3), pp. 289–314
- Delibasić V. (2016). Prikriveni islednik, [Undercover agent] Nauka, bezbednost, policija, no.1 pp.81-98
- Filipović, N., & Koprivica, A. (2022). Prikriveni islednik u određenim zemljama kontinentalno evropskog Sistema [The undercover investigators in the specific countries of the european contitental legal system]. Pravo – teorija i praksa 39(2), pp.108–121
- Golubović, B. (2021). Podela svedoka u krivičnom postupku [Divison of the witnesses in the criminal proceedings]. Nacionalna bezbednost, 13, pp.83–102
- Ilić, G. (2012). Ostećeni i standardi ljudskih prava u krivičnom postupku [Injured party and the standards of human rights in the criminal proceedings] Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60(2), pp. 135–161
- Ilić, I., & Knežević, S. (2020). Obim člana 6 Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima – doprinos praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava [Scope of article 6 of the European Convention on human rights – contribution of the European court of human rights practice]. Balkan social science rewiev, 16, pp. 39–55
- Karas, Ž. (2012). Neka dokazna pitanja o razgovoru privatnog istražitelja s osumnjičenikom [Some evidential issues on covert questioning by undercover agents]. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 19(1), pp. 127–160
- Lazarov, Z. (2018). Zaštita svedoka u krivičnom postupku, doktorska disertacija [Witness protection in the criminal procedure, doctoral dissertation]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
- Lonati, S. (2018). Anonymous witness evidence before European court of human rights: Is it still possible to speak about fair trial? European criminal law review, 8(1), pp. 116–142
- Pajčić, M. (2005). Ugroženi svjedoci u kaznenom postupku [Threatened witnesses in criminal procedure]. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 12(1), pp. 33–62
- Recommendation No. R (97) 13 of the Committee of Ministers to member states concerning intimidation of witnesses and the rights of the defence (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 September 1997 at the 600th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
- Škulić, M. (2005). Prikriveni islednik – zakonsko rešenje i neka sporna pitanja [Undercover agent – legal solution and some controversial questions) Bezbednost, 47(3), pp. 373–397
- Turanjanin, V. (2021). Anonimni svedoci i zaštita ljudskih prava[Anonymous witness and the protection of human rights] In: Soković, S. (ur.), Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske unije, knj. 9, [Harmonization of the legal system of Serbia with the standards of the European Union, vol. 9] (pp. 277–296). Kragujevac: Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Pravni fakultet
- Vasiljević, T., & Grubač, M. (2011). Komentar Zakona o krivičnom postupku [Commentary of the criminal procedure code]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
- Vogliotti, M. (1998). La logica floue della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo tra tutela del testimone e salvaguardia del contraddittorio: il caso delle “testimonianze anonime” [The fluid logic of the European Court of Human Rights between witness protection and cross-examination protection: the case of “anonymous testimonies”]. Giurisprudenza italiana, pp. 851–860
