Cooperative learning to form communicative competence of university students

Бесплатный доступ

The article discusses the features of cooperative learning in universities, as well as its potential advantages related to edutainment, gamification, digital storytelling, and pitching. This innovative technology involves collaborative activities among students in small groups under the guidance of an instructor to achieve specific educational goals. Positive interactions among group members, individual responsibility of each participant, mutual encouragement of success in the student-student and student-instructor interaction, and the development of soft skills are the main components of cooperative learning. The research aims to develop and test a cooperative technology to form communicative competence of students of Russian higher education institutions. The authors developed a cooperative technology to form communicative competence of students, identified the characteristics of the technology, determined students' expectations from the technology used, and tested the technology through pedagogical experimentation. The study employed theoretical (integrative literature review, modeling) and empirical (survey, questionnaires, pedagogical experiment, descriptive statistics) methods. The experiment involved first-year bachelor's students from the advanced engineering school “Heart of Ural” at South Ural State University. The effectiveness of the developed technology was demonstrated based on the following criteria: the improvement of foreign language proficiency according to the European CEFR scale, motivation, and teamwork skills.

Еще

Higher education, foreign language, cooperative learning, communicative competence, university students, edutainment

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147247559

IDR: 147247559   |   DOI: 10.14529/ped250103

Список литературы Cooperative learning to form communicative competence of university students

  • Bartle R.A. Designing Virtual Worlds. Creative Commons License 4.0: CC BY-NC-ND, Great Britain, 2003. 947 p.
  • Burgess D. Teach like a PIRATE. San Diego, CA, Dave Burgess Consulting Inc. Publ., 2012. 92 p.
  • Codish D., Ravid G. Personality Based Gamification-educational Gamification for Extroverts and Introverts. Available at: https://www.openu.ac.il/innovation/chais2014/download/E2-2.pdf (accessed 10.09.2024).
  • Deterding S., Dixon D., Khaled R., Nacke L. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining “Gamification.” MindTrek, 2011, pp. 9–15. DOI: 10.1145/2181037.2181040
  • Dichev C., Dicheva D. Gamifying Education: What is Known, What is Believed and What Remains Uncertain: a Critical Review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2017, vol. 14, no. 9. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
  • Gil A. The Role of the Internet in Self-Study. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2015, vol. 4, pp. 393–404.
  • Jacobs G.M., McCafferty S.G. Connections between Cooperative Learning and Second Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge University Press, 2006, vol. 5, pp. 18–29.
  • Jacobs G. M., Power M.A., Loh W.I. The Teacher's Sourcebook for Cooperative Learning: Practical Techniques, Basic Principles, and Frequently Asked Questions. Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press Publ., 2002. 185 p.
  • Johnson A.L. Teaching Creative Problem Solving and Applied Reasoning Skills: A Modular Approach. Legal Education, California Western Law Review, 1998, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 389–396.
  • Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T., Holubec E.J. Cooperation in the Classroom (8th ed.). Edina, MN, Interaction Book Company Publ., 2013, pp. 159–174.
  • Hakulinen L., Auvinen T. The Effect of Gamification on Students with Different Achievement Goal Orientations. International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering proceedings (LaTiCE), IEEE, pp. 9–16. DOI: 10.1109/latice.2014.10.
  • Islam S., Jahan N. Digitalization and Education System: A Survey. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), 2018, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 70–73.
  • Kapp K.M. The Gamification of Learning and Instruction Fieldbook: Ideas into Practice [Google Books Version]. John Wiley & Sons Publ., 2013. 480 p.
  • Kimura H. Controversy over Cooperative Learning: An Interview with Dr George M Jacobs. The Language Teacher, 2009, vol. 3, no. 38, pp. 13–16.
  • Kleban M. Academic English Language Teachers’ Roles in a Virtual and Hybrid Exchange Project. Philological Class, 2021, vol. 26, no 3, pp. 178–187. DOI: 10.51762/1FK-2021-26-03-15
  • Knight P.T. Being a Teacher in Higher Education. Buckingham, England, Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press Publ., 2002. 245 p.
  • Kotlyarova I.O., Chuvashova A.D. Information and Communication Digital Environment to Strengthen Systematization of Engineers’ Competencies Development. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference “Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies”, T and QM and IS, 2021, pp. 589–593. DOI: 10.1109/ITQMIS53292.2021.9642854
  • Lazorak O.V., Dara Kamal Mohammed Amin. Developing University Students’ Soft Skills via Project Activities. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences, 2024, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 56–64. DOI: 10.14529/ped240205
  • Nicol D., Thomson A., Breslin C. Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2014, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 102–122.
  • Mohammad Tamimy, Naser Rashidi, Joyce Hwee Ling Koh. The Use of Cooperative Learning in English as Foreign Language Classes: The Prevalence, Fidelity, and Challenges. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2023, vol. 121, pp. 2–13.
  • Richards J. Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge University Press Publ., 2006. 52 p.
  • Sadiq S., Zamir Sh. Effectiveness of Modular Approach in Teaching at University Level. Journal of Education and Practice. Available at: http://www.iiste.org/book (accessed 15.02.2020).
  • Schmidt T., Strasser T. Media-Assisted Foreign Language Learning – Concepts and Functions. Teaching English as a Foreign Language, An Introduction. Stuttgart, Metzle Publ., 2018, pp. 211–231.
  • Slavin R.E. Making Cooperative Learning Powerful. Educational Leadership, 2014, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 22–26.
  • Smiderle R., Rigo S.J., Marques L.B. The Impact of Gamification on Students’ Learning, nEngagement and Behavior Based on their Personality Traits. Smart Learning Environments, 2020, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 7–11. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x
  • Spada N. Communicative Language Teaching: Current Status and Future Prospects. International Hand Book of English Language Teaching (Part I). New York, Springer Publ., 2007. 87 p.
  • Van My Nguyen, Ankudinova N.G. Developing Global Thinking of Modern Specialist as Condition for Security. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences, 2023, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 78–86. DOI: 10.13529/ped230207
  • Volchenkova K.N., Kolova S.M. Technology for Development of Soft Skills of Future Architects. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences, 2024, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 27–38. DOI: 10.14529/ped240303
  • Wang T. Applying Slavin’s Cooperative Learning Techniques to a College EFL Conversation Class. Human Resource and Adult Learning Journal, 2009, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 112–120.
  • Yan Zhang. Cooperative Language Learning and Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2010, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–83.
  • Yavuz O., Arslan A. Cooperative Learning in Acquisition of the English Language Skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 2018, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 591–600. DOI: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.591
Еще
Статья научная