COVID-19: international power structures and global health policy. focus on who and international solidarity

Бесплатный доступ

For decades, virtually all parties with political or medical responsibility for pandemic issues have stressed the need for more intensive inter-national cooperation. COVID-19 is only the latest epidemic for the time being to demonstrate the massive discrepancy between rhetoric and reality in this regard. A global health policy worthy of the name still does not exist. The WHO and its sub-organizations have neither the competencies nor the financial resources to live up to their claim proclaimed by the community of states. Against the backdrop of the crisis created by the spread of SARS-CoV-2, this article asks what the pre-conditions and determinants of this failure are. First, it illuminates the ideological and political patterns that shape the strategic thinking and actions of those major powers that command global health policy and other aspects of global governance. The following section discusses the resulting (malfunctioning) structures for addressing epidemics and diseases, which are also barriers to the development of comprehensive health systems. Thirdly, the implications for the possibilities of addressing the COVID pandemic and also helping those countries and regions of the Global South that have neither the financial resources nor the tools of the rich North are discussed. In this context, we will take a look at the role of the EU and Germany and their programs and practice of global health policy. Germany, after all, held the presidency of the Union in the second half of 2020 — amid the pandemic. The last part deals with the role and influence of an increasing «neoliberalization» of the health care system, especially since the 1990s, and the impacts for research and development, as well as with a pharmaceutical industry that primarily follows market laws and only secondarily health maxims. Under this aspect, the «vaccination race» between and within the EU and other actors is considered. Simultaneously, the question is raised whether and to what extent there are chances to steer the unsatisfactory state of affairs in a direction that enables better disease control on a regional and global scale through international cooperation and strengthened institution building.

Еще

Global health policy, COVID-19, solidarity, international cooperation, WHO, vaccination

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/143173978

IDR: 143173978

Список литературы COVID-19: international power structures and global health policy. focus on who and international solidarity

  • Gelbmann U. Resillience and Transformation — Vain Concepts or More?, Werther-Pietsch U.(Ed.) Powering Universalism — Future Global Governance, Klein Publishing, Wien, 2021: 49 — 63
  • WHO 2021a — Contributors, http://open.who.int/2018-19/contributors/contributor(2021): [26.01.2021]
  • Länderdaten.info (2021) https://www.laenderdaten.info/lebenserwartung.php [26.01.2021]
  • Zeit Online (2020): Vermögen wachsen auch in Corona.Krise, 23 9 2020, https://www.zeit.de/news/2020-09/23/boersenboom-treibt-geldvermoegen-staerkster-anstieg seit2005?utm_referrer=https%3A2F%www.google.com [26.01.2021]
  • Weltgesundheitsorganisation, Regionalbüro für Europa: Die WHO in der Welt. (Online) https://www.euro.who.int/de/about-us/organization/who-worldwide [26.01.2021]
  • Deutsches Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO), https://www.bundesgesund-heitsministerium.de/themen/internationale-gesundheitspolitik/global/who.html [26.01.2021]
  • Cabestan J-P. China’s Battle with Coronavirus: Possible Geopolitical Gains and Real Challenges, Aljazeera Centre for Studies, 19. 04. 2020, https://studies.aljazeera.net/sites/default/files/articles/documents/2020-04/China?s%20Battle%20Coronavirus%20Possible%20Geopolitical%20Gains%20and%20Real%20Challenges.pdf [26.01.2021]
  • WHO 2020: Global partnership to make available 120 million affordable, quality COVID-19 rapid tests for low-and-middle-income countries,29 9 2020, https://www.who.int/news/item/28-09-2020-global-partnership-to-make-available-120-million-affordable-quality-COVID-19-rapid-tests-for-low-and-middle-income-countries [26.01.2021]
  • Statista): Anzahl durchgeführter Tests für das Coronavirus (COVID-19) in ausgewählten Ländern, 26.1.2021, https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1105095/umfrage/anzahl-durchgefuehrter-tests-fuer-das-coronavirus-nach-laendern/ [26.01.2021]
  • European Commission: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council. Preparedness for COVID-19 vaccine strategies and vaccine deployment. 15 10 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/vaccination/docs/2020_strategies_deployment_en.pdf [26.01.2021]
  • vfa (2021): So funktioniert die COVAX Facility für weltweiten Zugang zu Covid-Impfstoffen, 26 01 2021, https://www.vfa.de/de/arzneimittel-forschung/coronavirus/covax-facility [26.01.2021]
  • Begner S. & Voss M. Globale Gesundheitspolitik der EU. Eine Agenda für die deutsche Ratspräsidentschaft, SWP-Aktuell 2020/A, March 2020, online, [26.01.2021]
  • Europäische Kommission (2018): Global Health Policy Forum 2018, https://ec.europa.eu/health/international_cooperation/events/ev_20180201_de#1 [26.01.2021]
  • Pradetto A. Multiples Versagen: WHO, EU und Deutschland in der Corona-Krise. WIFIS-Arbeitspapier Nr. 3, Hamburg, June 2020; https://welttrends.de/res/uploads/WIFIS_Arbeitspapier_3_Pradetto_Corona_200708_Online.pdf [26.01.2021]
  • Europäische Kommission (2021): Coronakrise — Impfstoffstrategie, https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/coronavirus-response/public-health/coronavirus-vaccines-strategy_de [26.01.2021]
  • Böll C. & T. Fenders (2021): Wer arm ist, muss beim Impfen länger warten, FAZ, 12 1 2021, https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/corona-impf-stoff-arme-laender-muessen-laenger-warten-17139201.html?premium [26.01.2021]
  • Kiparski S. Introduction: On Sovereignty. Werther-Pietsch U. (Ed.) Powering Universalism — Future Global Governance, Klein Publishing, Wien, 2021: 127–129.
  • Wank L. Powerhouses Ahead. Werther-Pietsch U. (Ed.) Powering Universalism — Future Global Governance, Klein Publishing, Wien, 2021: 255–269.
  • Wasinger M. Nasty geopolitics? Werther-Pietsch U. (Ed.) Powering Universalism — Future Global Governance, Klein Publishing, Wien, 2021: 39–48.
  • Deutsches Bundesministerium für Forschung und Bildung: SARS und MERS: Relevanz für die Covid-19-Pandemie, https://www.gesundheitsforschung- bmbf.de/de/sars-und-mers-relevanz-fur-die COVIS-19-pandemie-11152.php [26.01.2021]
Еще
Статья научная