Developing self-editing skills of doctoral students

Бесплатный доступ

Mastering academic writing is widely acknowledged as crucial for the professional development of doctoral students and their success in publishing in reputable journals. However, many PhD candidates encounter significant challenges in this area, largely due to inadequate support from supervisors and limited access to training courses. This deficit is particularly pronounced in self-editing skills training, which can result in frustration and decreased confidence in their writing abilities. There is scarce research in pedagogical theory and practice that describes pedagogical models or technologies that contribute to the development of self-editing skills in research paper writing. The aim of this study is to scientifically justify, develop, and test a pedagogical technology aimed at enhancing PhD students’ self-editing skills. The development of the technology is based on systematic and process-oriented approaches, as well as social constructivism theory, which is reflected in the practical implementation of peer learning and project activities. The pedagogical technology is implemented within the framework of an English-language course “English for Researchers: Editing Research Papers”. The empirical study involved 29 graduate students from South Ural State University. The feedback survey conducted after the course's implementation assessed its effectiveness based on the criteria of participant satisfaction. Results indicate high levels of satisfaction with course structure, content, and delivery, with participants reporting significant improvements in their ability to self-edit research papers. The findings have far-reaching implications for enhancing doctoral education by emphasizing the necessity of integrating self-editing training within academic curricula. The novelty of the study lies in the author's proposal and theoretical justification of a pedagogical technology that positions the editing process as a distinct type of activity within publication activity, which enables PhD students to become independent and autonomous authors of research papers and fosters PhD students’ professional growth in the field of academic publishing.

Еще

Pedagogical technology, phd students, academic writing, self-editing skills, peer learning, project-based learning (pjbl)

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147245983

IDR: 147245983   |   DOI: 10.14529/ped240403

Список литературы Developing self-editing skills of doctoral students

  • Adamek M.E. Building Scholarly Writers: Student Perspectives on Peer Review in a Doctoral Writing Seminar. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 2015, vol. 35 (1-2), pp. 213–225. DOI: 10.1080/08841233.2014.995333
  • Boud D., Lee A. “Peer learning” as Pedagogic Discourse for Research Education. Studies in Higher Education, 2005, vol. 30 (5), pp. 501–516.
  • Cahusac de Caux B.C., Pretorius L. Learning Together through Collaborative Writing: The Power of Peer Feedback and Discussion in Doctoral Writing Groups, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2024, vol. 83, 101379. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101379
  • Carless D., Boud D. The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 43 (8), pp. 1315–1325. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
  • Castillo-Martínez I.M., Ramírez-Montoya M.S. Research Competencies to Develop Academic Reading and Writing: a Systematic Literature Review. Front. Educ., 2021, 5:576961. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.576961
  • Diab N.M. Effects of Peer-versus Self-editing on Students’ Revision of Language Errors in Revised Drafts. System, 2009, vol. 38, pp. 85–95. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2009.12.008
  • Dinham S., Scott, C. The Experience of Disseminating the Results of Doctoral Research. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2001, vol. 25 (1), pp. 45–55. DOI: 10.1080/03098770020030498
  • Ferguson S.L., Sam C., Elder B. Making the Academic Writing Process Explicit for Doctoral Students in the Social Sciences. The Qualitative Report, 2023, vol. 28 (2), pp. 495–516. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5464
  • García-Aracil A., Monteiro S., Almeida L.S. Students’ Perceptions of their Preparedness for Transition to Work after Graduation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 2021, vol. 22 (1), pp. 49–62. DOI: 10.1177/1469787418791026
  • Gupta S., Jaiswal A., Paramasivam A., Kotecha J. Academic Writing Challenges and Supports: Perspectives of International Doctoral Students and Their Supervisors. Front. Educ., 2022, 7:891534. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.891534
  • Hopwood N. Doctoral Students as journal editors: non‐formal learning through academic work. Higher Education Research & Development, 2010, vol. 29 (3), pp. 319–331. DOI: 10.1080/07294360903532032
  • Kamler B. Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 2008, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 283–294.
  • Lee A., Boud D. Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 2003, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 187–200.
  • Lei J., Hu G. Apprenticeship in Scholarly Publishing: A Student Perspective on Doctoral Supervisors’ Roles. Publications, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 27–42. DOI: 10.3390/publications3010027
  • Luce J.A., Murray J.P. New faculty’s perceptions of the academic working life. Journal of Staff, Program, & Organization Development, 1998, vol. 15 (3), pp. 98–103.
  • Maher D., Seaton L., McMullen C., Fitzgerald T., Otsuji E., Lee, A. ‘Becoming and being Writers’: the Experiences of Doctoral Students in Writing Groups. Studies in Continuing Education, 2008, vol. 30 (3), pp. 263–275. DOI: 10.1080/01580370802439870
  • Marini G. A. PhD in Social Sciences and Humanities: Impacts and Mobility to get Better Salaries in an International Comparison. Studies in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 44 (8), pp. 1332–1343. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1436537
  • Meschitti V. Can Peer Learning Support Doctoral Education? Evidence from an Ethnography of a Research Team. Studies in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 44 (7), pp. 1209–1221. DOI: 1080/03075079.2018.1427711
  • Meyerring D. The Paradox of Writing in Doctoral Education: Student Experiences. Doctoral Education: Research-Based Strategies for Doctoral Students, Supervisors and Administrators. L. McAlpine, C. Amundsen (Eds.). Springer, Dordrecht, 2011, pp. 75–96. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_5
  • Pospelova T. The Influence of Self-editing on Micro Skills Development in Academic Writing in English as a Second Language. Journal of Language and Education, 2016, vol. 2 (1), pp. 30–38. DOI: 10.17323/2411-7390-2016-2-1-30-38
  • Sangeetha V. Inculcating Self-Editing Skills for Enhancing Writing Skills of the EFL Students. International Journal of Instruction, 2020, vol. 13 (1), pp. 509–522. DOI: 10.29333/iji.2020.13133a
  • Selevko G.K. Sovremennie obrasovatelnie tekhnologii. Uchebnoe posobie [Modern Educational Technologies. Training Manual]. Moskow, Izdatel`stvo Narodnoe obrasovanie Publ., 1998, p. 256.
  • Sverdlik A., Hall N.C., McAlpine L., Hubbard K. Journeys of a PhD student and unaccompanied minors. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2018, vol. 13, pp. 361–388. DOI: 10.28945/4113
  • Wang T., Li L.Y. ‘Tell me what to Do’ vs. ‘Guide me through it’: Feedback Experiences of International Doctoral Students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 2011, vol. 12 (2), pp. 101–112. DOI: 10.1177/1469787411402438
  • Wilkins S., Hazzam J., Lean J. Doctoral Publishing as Professional Development for an Academic Career in Higher Education, The International Journal of Management Education, 2021, vol. 19 (1), p. 100459. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100459
  • Zhu Q., Carless D. Dialogue within Peer Feedback Processes: Clarification and Negotiation of Meaning. Higher Education Research & Development, 2018, vol. 37 (4), pp. 883–897. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417
Еще
Статья научная