Digital evidence in criminal proceedings – challenges and solutions
Автор: Jelena Matijašević, Nenad Bingulac, Darko Marinković
Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa @pravni-fakultet
Рубрика: Articles
Статья в выпуске: 4 vol.41, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
In the last decade, digital evidence in criminal proceedings has become a key tool in modern forensic investigation, with the help of which it is possible to identify, analyze and verify information that can be crucial for making a decision in court proceedings. Digital data, through the perception of various forms of electronic records, are increasingly becoming the basic evidence in criminal cases, and because of this, no distinction is made between existing material evidence and modern digital evidence. In this research, the importance of digital evidence, its advantages and challenges in collection and processing, as well as the legal and ethical aspects of its use in criminal proceedings were pointed out and indicated. The importance of the methodological approach in the forensic analysis of digital evidence was also pointed out, all in order to achieve the admissibility of digital evidence before a criminal court. The challenges and opportunities presented by this evidence are drawn throughout the research and pointed out. The hypothesis of this research is contained in its title and refers precisely to controversial issues and the legislative application of digital evidence in criminal proceedings. The aim of the work is to consider this topic by looking at the new regulation and directive that have been passed and will only be adopted in 2026, but in principle to consider the issue of digital evidence through practice because this topic remains crucial for the further development of the judicial system in the digital age. During the writing of this research, an analytical method was used in order to consider the legislation of the European Union, and make a comparison with the domestic legislation. Then, the normative method was used when considering the criminal procedure and defining digital evidence, and certainly the deductive method was also used.
Digital evidence, criminal law, criminal procedure, European legislation, forensic analysis
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170206443
IDR: 170206443 | DOI: 10.5937/ptp2404018M
Список литературы Digital evidence in criminal proceedings – challenges and solutions
- Bajović, V. (2024). Zakonik o krivičnom postupku: Neophodno precizirati korišćenje digitalnih dokaza u krivičnom postupku [Criminal Procedure Code: It is necessary to specify the use of digital evidence in criminal proceedings]. Downloaded 2024, October 7 from www.paragraf.rs/dnevne-vesti/221222/221222-vest2.html
- Budapest Convention (2021). The Convention on Cybercrime. Budapest Convention, ETS No. 185 and its Protocols.
- Camp, S. (2024). Online Shopping Security Issues and How Cyber Security can Help. Downloaded 2024, October 7 from Ecpi University: www.ecpi.edu/blog/online-shopping-security-issues-and-how-cyber-security-can-help
- Casey, E. (2004). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime. Academic Press.
- Committee, C. C. (2020). The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime: benefits and impact in practice. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
- Cybercrime (2024). Retrieved from 20th anniversary Budapest Convention - Benefits, Downloaded 2024, October 7 from www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/benefits
- Convention on Cybercrime (2024). Joining the Convention on Cybercrime: Benefits. Council of Europe.
- Councle of Europe (2001). European Treaty Series - No. 185 - Convention on Cybercrime.
- Champlain College (2024). The Evolution of Digital Forensics. Retrieved from Champlain College Online: Downloaded 2024, October 7 from https://online.champlain.edu/blog/evolution-digital-forensics
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and for the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings
- Directive (EU) 2023/1544 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 laying down harmonised rules on the designation of designated establishments and the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering electronic evidence in criminal proceedings
- Iproceeds (2024). Izveštaj o proceni u vezi sa pribavljanjem i korišćenjem elektronskih dokaza u krivičnom postupku na osnovu domaćeg zakonodavstva u zemljama jugoistočne Evrope i Turskoj. [Assessment report regarding the acquisition and use of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings based on domestic legislation in Southeast European countries and Turkey]. Project on targeting crime proceeds on the Internet in South-East Europe and Turkey. Downloaded 2024, October 7 from https://rm.coe.int/3156-52-iproceeds-electronic-evidence-report-serbian/16807bdfe3
- Juszczak, A. Sason, E. (2023). The Use of Electronic Evidence in the European Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice. EuCrim, Issue 2/2023, pp.182–200.
- Kovačević, M. (2013). Video nadzor na javnim mestima i pravo na privatnost [Video surveillance in public places and the right to privacy]. Teme, 37(4), pp. 1795-1810.
- Krivični zakonik,[Criminal code] "Sl. glasnik RS", br. 85/2005, 88/2005 - ispr., 107/2005 - ispr., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014, 94/2016 i 35/2019. (n.d.).
- Macan, S. (2021). Pravna prihvaljivost nivoa bezbjednosti sistema elektronske identifikacije [Legal acceptability of the security level of the electronic identification system]. Godišnjak Fakulteta pravnih nauka, Vol.11, pp.186-199.
- Matijašević, J. (2012). Visokotehnološki kriminal u funkciji organizovanog kriminaliteta [High-tech crime in the function of organized crime]. Conference: Organized Crime – The Challenge of XXI centuryAt: Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu, Univerzitet Privredna akademija u Novom Sadu, pp 398-419.
- Mihajlović, A. (2024). Zakonik o krivičnom postupku: Neophodno precizirati korišćenje digitalnih dokaza u krivičnom postupku [Criminal Procedure Code: It is necessary to specify the use of digital evidence in criminal proceedings]. Downloaded 2024, October 7 from www.paragraf.rs/dnevne-vesti/221222/221222-vest2.html
- Miljuš, I. (2024). Zakonik o krivičnom postupku: Neophodno precizirati korišćenje digitalnih dokaza u krivičnom postupku [Criminal Procedure Code: It is necessary to specify the use of digital evidence in criminal proceedings]. Downloaded 2024, October 7 from www.paragraf.rs/dnevne-vesti/221222/221222-vest2.html
- Oxford, U. (2024). Information Security. Retrieved from Protect my privacy online - University of Oxford: Downloaded 2024, October 7 from www.infosec.ox.ac.uk/protect-my-privacy-online
- Osco, M. Mercedes, C. Quinones, A. Joaquin, D. (2024). Digital Evidence as a Means of Proof in Criminal Proceedings. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 18(4), pp.1-13.
- Petrović, L. (2024). Digitalni dokazi [Digital evidence]. Ziteh, 1-13.
- Propp, K. (2024). CBDF. Retrieved from LAWFARE – Navigating Toward an EU-U.S. Agreement on Electronic Evidence: Downloaded 2024, October 7 from www.crossborderdataforum.org/lawfare-navigating-toward-an-eu-u-s-agreement-on-electronic-evidence/
- Ragni, C. (2023). Digital evidence in international criminal proceedings and human rights challenges. International Scientific Conference on International, EU and Comparative Law Issues “Law in the Age of Modern Technologies”, pp. 1-16.
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and for the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings.
- Reith, M. Carr, C, Gunsch, G. (2003). An Examination of Digital Forensic Models. International Journal of Digital Evidence, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 1-9.
- Spasić, V. Stevanović, B. (2015). Dokazivanje digitalnih povreda prava intelektualne svojine - osvrt na anglosaksonski pravni sistem [Proving digital violations of intellectual property rights - a review of the Anglo-Saxon legal system]. Zbotnik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, LIV(69), pp 203-226.
- Sulcas, A. (2024). What is Targeted Marketing? Definition, Strategies & Examples. Downloaded 2024, October 7 from Digital Targeted Marketing: www.sender.net/blog/targeted-marketing/
- Tompkins, J. Mar, L. (1986). The 1984 Federal Computer Crime Statute: A Partial Answer to a Pervasive Problem, 6 Computer L.J. 459 (1986). UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & PrivacyUIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law, Vol.6. Iss 3., pp. 461-482.
- Wahl, T. (2023). E-evidence Regulation and Directive Published. EuCrim, pp. 165–168.
- Zakonik o krivičnom postupku [Criminal Procedure Code], Sl. glasnik RS, br. 72/2011, 101/2011, 121/2012, 32/2013, 45/2013, 55/2014, 35/2019, 27/2021 - odluka US i 62/2021 - odluka US.