Zoroastrian dualism and the problem of moral choice of religious consciousness Talysh people

Бесплатный доступ

The article aims to consider the equality of the two deities in Zoroastrianism, Ahura-Mazda and Angra Manyu, to show the solution to the problem of moral choice for one of the most ancient peoples of the East of the Talysh people. Shows the point of view of European philosophers and religious scholars on Zoroastrianism. They considered him a dualistic concept that was distinguished from Zoroastrianism Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The authors concluded that this position is incorrect, and this dualism is ephemeral. Zoroastrian Ahura-Mazda is the Supreme God, he is all powerful and Almighty. Angra Manyu is always inferior to him. It is not as important as the main God. Everything created by Ahura Mazda, is good. Evil appears later, and it appears the fault of the person. Conclusion: free will is provided by Zoroastrianism, it is not "opening" of Christianity. In Zoroastrianism the first time the problem of theodicy - the justification of God. God is not responsible for the evil in the world.

Еще

Zoroastrianism, dualism, deity, talysh people, ahura-mazda, angra magno

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/144160940

IDR: 144160940

Статья научная