Effective models for teaching and learning academic writing in non-native setting: context and techniques

Бесплатный доступ

this paper evaluates the scope of teaching academic writing to Chinese students in a non-native speaking environment. We define the context of EAP studying and outline its purposes, which should be distinguished from those associated with ESP instruction or content-based instruction. This distinction is important as it determines the teaching framework of EAP instruction. We suggest that a teaching model aligned with such framework would emphasize the «reading-to-write» approach based on discourse analysis techniques as opposed to genre-based techniques. The suggested model foregrounds the interactive nature of learning, characterized by tangible forms of learning explored through instructional conversations. In the second part of the article, we show how these ideas apply to the teaching of summary writing as a core activity in academic writing programs. We believe the suggested approach can provide necessary scaffolding for novice writers in academic English and EAP teachers who are looking for more effective ways of teaching academic skills.

Еще

Eap, academic reading, academic writing, transferrable academic skills, genre, learning strategies, instructional discourse

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147241417

IDR: 147241417   |   DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2023.8604

Список литературы Effective models for teaching and learning academic writing in non-native setting: context and techniques

  • Butler D. B., Zhou Y., Wei M. When the culture of learning plays a role in academic English writing. ESP across Cultures. 2013. Vol. 10. No. 10. P. 55‒74.
  • Macbeth K. P. Deliberate false provisions: The use and usefulness of models in learning academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2010. No. 19. P. 33–48.
  • Hyland K. Academic discourse. English in a global context. New York, 2009. 215 p.
  • Dudley-Evans T., St. John J. Developments in ESP: a multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge, 2012. 302 p.
  • Tarone E. Conscious Communication Strategies in Interlanguage: A Progress Report. On TESOL’77 teaching and learning English as a second language’ Trends in resource and practice. Washington, 1978. P. 194‒201.
  • Shi L. Textual appropriation and citing behaviors of university undergraduates. Applied Linguistics. 31. 2010. No. 31. P. 1‒24.
  • Hirvela A., Du Q. «Why am I paraphrasing?»: undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2013. No. 12 (2). 2013. P. 87‒98. DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.005
  • Braziller A., Kleinfeld E. Bedrock book of genres: a guide and reader. Bedford / St. Martin’s, Second Edition. 608 p.
  • Van Dijk T. A. Macrostructures: an interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. New Jersey, 1980. 327 p.
  • [Electronic resource]. Electron. dan. URL: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/professional-development/teachers/managing-resources/articles/text-language-classrooms-talo-tavi (date of acсess 11.07.2023).
  • Johns A., Paz D. Text analysis and pedagogical summaries: revisiting Johns and Davies. Functional approaches to written text analysis. Washington, 1997. P. 33‒50.
  • Hirvela A. Connecting Reading and Writing in Second Language Writing Instruction. Michigan, 2004. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.23736
  • Newell G. E., Bloome D., Hirvela A. Teaching and learning argumentative writing in high school English language arts classrooms. New York, 2015. P. 17‒19.
  • Moussu L. M. Native and nonnative English-speaking English as a second language teachers: student attitudes, teacher self-perceptions, and intensive English administrator beliefs and practices. Thesis [Electronic resource]. Electron. dan. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492599.pdf (date of acсess 11.07.2023).
Еще
Статья научная