Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Psychology Undergraduates Studying Online Statistics Courses in Indonesia

Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Psychology Undergraduates Studying Online Statistics Courses in Indonesia

Автор: Astri Setiamurti, Rose Mini Agoes Salim, Maridha Normawati, Atikah Ainun Mufidah, Frieda Maryam Mangunsong, Shahnaz Safitri

Журнал: International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education @ijcrsee

Рубрика: Original research

Статья в выпуске: 3 vol.11, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

This study aimed to assess the influence of students’ intrapersonal factors, namely Academic Intrinsic Motivation (AIM), Perceived Creativity Fostering Teacher Behavior (P-CFTB), Academic Self-Efficacy (ASE), and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) on student engagement in undergraduate psychology students taking online Statistics courses. A cross-sectional and quantitative design was used from October to December 2022. The data collection procedure used a convenience sampling technique, with questionnaires distributed online (via social media) and offline (via lecturers, the Student Executive Board, and the Association of the Faculty of Psychology from various universities in Indonesia). The research participants were psychology undergraduates who had studied and passed the Statistics courses online, with 671 filling out the questionnaire. The results showed that all students’ intrapersonal factors, namely AIM, P-CFTB, ASE, and SRL, can determine student engagement by 66.9%, with ASE having the highest influence (23.99%) and P-CFTB having the lowest impact (9.78%). Moreover, the correlation value between SRL and SE was r = 0.700, p < 0.001, signifying a robust positive relationship between both variables.

Еще

Student engagement, perception of creativity fostering teacher behavior, academic self-efficacy, academic intrinsic motivation, self-regulated learning, online learning

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170200015

IDR: 170200015   |   DOI: 10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-3-359-373

Список литературы Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Psychology Undergraduates Studying Online Statistics Courses in Indonesia

  • Abd-Elmotaleb, M., & Saha, S. K. (2013). The role of academic self-efficacy as a mediator variable between perceived academic climate and academic performance. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n3p117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n3p117
  • Almarghani, E. M. & Mijatovic, I. (2017). Factors affecting student engagement in HEIs - It is all about good teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(8), 940-956, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1319808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1319808
  • Anjarwati, R., & Sa’adah, L. (2021). Student learning engagement in the online class. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 6(2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v6i2.6128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v6i2.6128
  • Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S.-L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
  • Barnard-Brak, L., Paton, V. O., & Lan, W. Y. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769
  • Bassi, M., Steca, P., Fave, A. D., & Caprara, G. V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9069-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9069-y
  • Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spines, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/citation/2000/12150/guidelines_for_the_process_of_cross_cultural.14.aspx DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  • Bell, H., Limberg, D., Jacobson, L., & Super, J. T. (2014). Enhancing Self-Awareness Through Creative Experiential-Learning Play-Based Activities. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 9(3), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2014.897926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2014.897926
  • Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528
  • Calabrese, G., Leadbitter, D. M., Trindade, N. D. S. M. D., Jeyabalan, A., Dolton, D., & ElShaer, A. Personal tutoring scheme: Expectations, perceptions and factors affecting students’ engagement. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.727410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.727410
  • Carpenter, T. P., & McDonald, J. (2017, May 1). Teaching (and learning) psychology statistics in an age of math anxiety. American Psychological Association. https://psychlearningcurve.org/psychology-statistics/
  • Cayubit, R. F. O. (2022). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x
  • Chang, D., & Chien, W. cheng. (2015). Determining the relationship between academic self-efficacy and student engagement by meta-analysis. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Education Reform and Modern Management, 142–145. https://doi.org/10.2991/ermm-15.2015.37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ermm-15.2015.37
  • Christenson, S., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
  • Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, Issue Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press., pp. 83– 114). Hampton Press. http://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Runcohandbookchapter.pdf
  • Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends, 60(6), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z
  • Dierendonck, C., Tóth-Király, I., Morin, A. J. S., Kerger, S., Milmeister, P., & Poncelet, D. (2023). Testing associations between global and specific levels of student academic motivation and engagement in the classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 91(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2021.1913979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2021.1913979
  • Elias, S. M., & MacDonald, S. (2007). Using past performance, proxy efficacy, and academic self-efficacy to predict college performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(11), 2518–2531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00268.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00268.x
  • Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abdalla, M., E., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., & Al Kawas, S. (2022). Factors that affect student engagement in online learning in health professions education. Nurse Education Today, 110, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105261
  • Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903353302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903353302
  • Fatoni, Arifiati, N., Nurkhayati, E., Nurdiawati, E., Pamungkas, G., Adha, S., Purwanto, A., Julyanto, O., & Azizi, E. (2020). University students online learning system during Covid-19 pandemic: Advantages, constraints and solutions. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 570–576. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3986850
  • Firmansyah, M. A. (2017). Analisis hambatan belajar mahasiswa pada mata kuliah statistika [Analysis of student learning barriers in statistics courses]. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2036
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  • Gettle, C. M. (2022). How personality traits and academic motivation affect engagement in synchronous online University courses [Undergraduate Thesis]. University of Regina. https://instrepo-prod.cc.uregina.ca/handle/10294/14894
  • Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005
  • Golder, J. (2018). Students’ perceptions on teacher behaviour at college level. International Education & Research Journal (IERJ), 4(6), 13–14. https://www.academia.edu/download/65833349/05_IERJ20188551152783_Print_Joydip_Golder.pdf
  • Grégoire, J. (2016). Understanding creativity in mathematics for improving mathematical education. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.24
  • Hafizi, M. H. M., & Kamarudin, N. (2020). Creativity in mathematics: Malaysian perspective. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3 3C), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081609
  • Hariyanto, D., Triyono, M. B., & Köhler, T. (2020). Usability evaluation of personalized adaptive e-learning system using USE questionnaire. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 12(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2020.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2020.12.005
  • Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2009). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. In S. R. Harper & S. J. Quaye (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203894125
  • Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate behavioral research, 50(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
  • Helsa, H., & Lidiawati, K. R. (2021). Peran self-efficacy terhadap student engagement pada mahasiswa dalam pandemi COVID-19. Psibernetika, 14(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/psibernetika.v14i2.2887
  • Hu, M., Li, H., Deng, W., & Guan, H. (2016). Student engagement: One of the necessary conditions for online learning. 2016 International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2016.31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2016.31
  • Huang, X. (2022). Constructing the associations between creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and teaching for creativity for primary and secondary teachers. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000453
  • Ifdil, I., Bariyyah, K., Dewi, A. K., & Rangka, I. B. (2019). The College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES); An Indonesian validation to measure the self-efficacy of students. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 4(4), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v4i42019p115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v4i42019p115
  • Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750
  • Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues. Cengage Learning.
  • Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., & Szumski, G. (2015). Teachers’ Effect on Students’ Creative Self-Beliefs Is Moderated by Students’ Gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.001
  • Katz-Buonincontro, J., Perignat, E., & Hass, R. W. (2020). Conflicted epistemic beliefs about teaching for creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100651
  • Khusniyah, N. L., & Hakim, L. (2019). Efektivitas pembelajaran berbasis daring: Sebuah bukti pada pembelajaran bahasa Inggris [The effectiveness of online learning: An evidence on English language learning]. Jurnal Tatsqif, 17(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v17i1.667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v17i1.667
  • Kim, D. J., Bae, S. C., Choi, S. H., Kim, H. J., & Lim, W. (2019). Creative character education in mathematics for prospective teachers. Sustainability, 11(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061730
  • Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099
  • Kuntarto, E. (2017). Keefektifan model pembelajaran daring dalam perkuliahan bahasa Indonesia di perguruan tinggi [The effectiveness of online learning in Indonesian language course in higher education]. Journal Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 3(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v3i1.1820
  • Lawton, S., & Taylor, L. (2020). Student perceptions of engagement in an introductory statistics course. Journal Of Statistics Education, 2020(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2019.1704201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2019.1704201
  • Lee, I. R., & Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice teachers’ personality traits and engagement in creative activities as predictors of their support for children’s creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873668
  • Lidiawati, R. K., & Helsa, H. (2021). Pembelajaran online selama pandemi Covid-19: Bagaimana strategi pembelajaran mandiri dapat mempengaruhi keterlibatan siswa [Online learning during Covid-19: How self-learning strategies can affect student engagement]. Jurnal Psibernetika, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/psibernetika.v14i1.2570
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223
  • Lloyd, S. A., & Robertson, C. L. (2012). Screencast tutorials enhance student learning of statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311430640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311430640
  • Mao, J., Chen, J., Ling, Y., & Huebner, E. S. (2020). Impact of Teachers’ Leadership on the Creative Tendencies of Students: The Mediating Role of Goal-orientation. Creativity Research Journal, 32(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1821569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1821569
  • Maroco, J., Maroco, A. L., Campos, J. A. D. B., & Fredricks, J. A. (2016). University student’s engagement: development of the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0042-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0042-8
  • Marvianto, R.D., & Widhiarso, W. (2019). Adaptasi Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) versi Bahasa Indonesia [Adaptation of the Indonesian version of the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)]. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.45785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.45785
  • Maulana, H. A., & Iswari, R. D. (2020). Analisis tingkat stres mahasiswa terhadap pembelajaran daring pada mata kuliah statistik bisnis di pendidikan vokasi [Analysis of student stress levels towards online learning in business statistics courses in vocational education]. Khazanah Pendidikan, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.30595/jkp.v14i1.8479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30595/jkp.v14i1.8479
  • Midi, H., Sarkar, S. K., & Rana, S. (2010). Collinearity diagnostics of binary logistic regression model. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 13(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2010.10700699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2010.10700699
  • Mustafa, J., Zayed, N. M., Islam, M. S., & Islam, S. (2018). Students’ perception towards their teachers’ behaviour: A case study on the undergraduate students of Daffodil International University. International Journal of Development Research, 8(10), 23387–23392. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329040464
  • Mutiara, T., & Rifameutia, T. (2021). Adaptasi alat ukur regulasi diri dalam belajar daring [Adaptation of self-regulation measurement tools in online learning]. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v6i12021p301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v6i12021p301
  • Myint, K. M., & Khaing, N. N. (2020). Factors influencing academic engagement of university students: A meta-analysis study. Journal of the Myanmar Academy of Arts and Science, 18(9B), 185–199. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352441444
  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Nurfitri, Y. A., & Aslamawati, Y. (2021). Pengaruh self-regulated learning terhadap student engagement pada mahasiswa prodi teknik informatika [The influence of self-regulated learning on student engagement in informatics engineering students]. Prosiding Psikologi, 7(2), 489–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.28413
  • Orr, A. M., & Kukner, J. M. (2015). Fostering a creativity mindset in content area pre-service teachers through their use of literacy strategies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.02.003
  • Owen, S. V, & Froman, R. D. (1988). Development of a college academic self-efficacy scale. Educational Resources Infoemation Center. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED298158
  • Osborne, J. W., & Waters, E. (2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.7275/r222-hv23
  • Pachler, D., Kuonath, A., & Frey, D. (2019). How transformational lecturers promote students’ engagement, creativity, and task performance: The mediating role of trust in lecturer and self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.12.004
  • Palaniappan, A. K. (2009). Creative teaching and its assessment. Paper Presentation, 12th UNESCO-APEID International Conference with the Theme “Quality Innovations for Teaching and Learning”, Impact Exhibition and Convention Center, Bangkok, Thailand, March 24-26, 2009, 1–15. http://eprints.um.edu.my/541/
  • Pramisjayanti, D., & Khoirunnisa, R. N. (2022). Hubungan antara self-efficacy dengan student engagement pada siswa SMP X kelas VIII selama masa pandemi COVID-19 [The relationship between self-efficacy and student engagement in class VIII students of X junior high school during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Character: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 9(1). https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/character/article/view/44709
  • Primana, L. (2015). Pengaruh dukungan makna belajar dari dosen, motivasi intrinsik, self efficacy, dan pandangan otoritas sumber informasi terhadap keterlibatan belajar Mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia [The contribution of lecturer’s meaning support in learning, intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, and student’s perceived epistemic authority, on learning engagement of Universitas Indonesia’s students] [Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Indonesia]. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20416085&lokasi=lokal
  • Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Biran, B., & Sela, Z. (2003). Teachers’ epistemic authority: Perceptions of students and teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 6(1), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021724727505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021724727505
  • Rodgers, T. (2008). Student engagement in the e-learning process and the impact on their grades. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education Pages, 1(2), 143–156. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/209167/
  • Rusman, Abd. A., & Nasution, F. (2020). Deskripsi kebahagiaan belajar mahasiswa BKI pada masa pandemi COVID-19 [Description of BKI students’ learning happiness during the COVID-19 pandemic]. AL-IRSYAD, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30829/al-irsyad.v10i1.7649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30829/al-irsyad.v10i1.7649
  • Sa’diyah, S. H. (2021). On off kamera dan implikasinya pada perkuliahan daring [Camera on off and its implications for online lectures]. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi), 2(9), 1593–1603. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v2i09.286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36418/japendi.v2i9.286
  • Sarjana, K., Hayati, L., & Wahidaturrahmi, W. (2020). Mathematical modelling and verbal abilities: How they determine students’ ability to solve mathematical word problems? Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 13(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v13i2.390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v13i2.390
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/mpr_Schermelleh.pdf
  • Setiani, S., & Wijaya, E. (2020). The relationship between self-regulated learning with student engagement in college students who have many roles. Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.045
  • Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
  • Soh, K. C. (2000). Indexing creativity fostering teacher behavior: A preliminary validation study. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01205.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01205.x
  • Staikopoulos, A., OKeeffe, I., Yousuf, B., Conlan, O., Walsh, E., & Wade, V. (2015). Enhancing student engagement through personalized motivations. 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 340–344. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.116
  • Suminta, R. R. (2016). Kecemasan statistik ditinjau dari dukungan akademik [Statistical anxiety and academic support]. Quality, 4(1), 120–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/quality.v4i1.2117
  • Ulpah, M. (2009). Belajar statistika: Mengapa dan bagaimana? [Leaning statistics: Why and how?]. INSANIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 14(3), 325–435. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v14i3.354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v14i3.354
  • Utami, R. D., & Aslamawati, Y. (2021). Pengaruh self-regulated learning terhadap student engagement pada mahasiswa prodi akuntansi di kota Bandung [The influence of self-regulated learning on student engagement in accounting students in Bandung]. Prosiding Psikologi, 7(2), 404–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.28374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsps.v2i1.356
  • Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
  • van Petegem, K., Aelterman, A., Rosseel, Y., & Creemers, B. (2007). Student perception as moderator for student wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 83(3), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9055-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9055-5
  • Varatharaj, R. (2018). Assessment in the 21st century classroom: The need for teacher autonomy. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 2(6), 105–109. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ravikumar-Varatharaj/publication/326730856_Assessment_in_the_21st_century_classroom_The_nedd_for_teacher_autonomy/links/5b7ae65592851c1e1223a7e6/Assessment-in-the-21st-century-classroom-The-nedd-for-teacher-autonomy.pdf
  • Waruwu, R. B., Hao, N. P., & Hia, P. H. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman mahasiswa pada mata kuliah statistika di STIKES Santa Elisabeth Medan tahun 2022 [Analysis of students’ understanding ability in statistics courses at STIKES Santa Elisabeth Medan in 2022]. SEHATMAS: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Masyarakat, 1(3), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.55123/sehatmas.v1i3.653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55123/sehatmas.v1i3.653
  • Warwick, J. (2008). Mathematical self-efficacy and student engagement in the mathematics classroom. MSOR Connections, 8(3), 31–37. https://web.archive.org/web/20170809041039id_/http://aces.shu.ac.uk/employability/resources/MSOR_8331_warwickj_mathselfefficacy.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.11120/msor.2008.08030031
  • Watts, S., & Thomas, S. (2022, June 7). What is statistics in psychology? Study.Com. https://study.com/learn/lesson/statistical-methods-in-psychology-analysis-types-application.html
  • Xia, Y., Hu, Y., Wu, C., Yang, L., & Lei, M. (2022). Challenges of online learning amid the COVID-19: College students’ perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037311
  • Zaimil, R. (2017). Analisa kesalahan mahasiswa dalam mengerjakan soal pada perkuliahan Statistika 1 FKIP Ummy Solok [Analysis of student errors in working on questions in the Statistics 1 Course FKIP Ummy Solok]. THEOREMS (The Journal of Mathematics) , 2(1), 78–85. https://ojs.fkipummy.ac.id/index.php/theorems/article/view/124
  • Zhang, Y., Li, P., Zhang, Z. S., Zhang, X., & Shi, J. (2022). The Relationships of Parental Responsiveness, Teaching Responsiveness, and Creativity: The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748321
  • Zhen, R., Liu, R.-D., Ding, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., & Xu, L. (2017). The mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relation between basic psychological needs satisfaction and learning engagement among Chinese adolescent students. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.017
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp