Five decades of risk perception measurements of tobacco use: a review of literature

Автор: Swapnil Gadhave, Aarti Nagarkar, Abhay Saraf

Журнал: Cardiometry @cardiometry

Рубрика: Report

Статья в выпуске: 20, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Perceptions of risk are beliefs about the likelihood of damage or loss. People make subjective judgments regarding the intensity and features of a danger. Smoking start and continuation are influenced by risk perception. Risk perception of tobacco use or smoking has always been controversial. Few studies found that risk perception is overestimated by smokers and tobacco users, while other studies found that smokers underestimate the risk of smoking. It has been observed that different authors have been using different approaches to measure the risk perception of tobacco use. The present literature review is an ontological exploration of the process of calculating this construct and determining which method gives more holistic and robust information. A literature survey was carried out to understand different ways in which risk perception can be measured. Fifty- seven studies were identified from 1970 to 2020 in which risk perception was calculated for any form of tobacco use. The literature review found that the researchers used two practical approaches to measure risk perception. In the first approach, the researchers tried to measure only the health risks of tobacco use, and in the second, multiple dimensions of tobacco use were measured. Most commonly perceived addiction and then the social risk of tobacco use was accessed. Though recent literature is dominated by an approach where a single dimension, i.e., perceived health risk of tobacco use, is most commonly access, it is inferring from the available literature that tools that access multiple sizes of the perceived risk of tobacco use give more comprehensive and robust information about that construct which can be used further to create tobacco use prevention intervention.

Еще

Tobacco, Risk perception, Prevention, Experience, Addiction

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148322437

IDR: 148322437   |   DOI: 10.18137/cardiometry.2021.20.8899

Список литературы Five decades of risk perception measurements of tobacco use: a review of literature

  • Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39): Springer. 1985.
  • Akl EA, Jawad M, Lam WY, Obeid R, Irani J. Motives, beliefs and attitudes towards waterpipe tobacco smoking: a systematic review. Harm reduction journal. 2013;10(1):12.
  • Anjum Q, Ahmed F, Ashfaq T. Knowledge, attitude and perception of waterpipe smoking (Shisha) among adolescents aged 14-19 years. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2008;58(6):312.
  • Baghal T. The measurement of risk perceptions: The case of smoking. Journal of risk research. 2011;14(3):351-64.
  • Bandura A. Social learning theory Englewood Cliffs. In: Prentice-Hall Series in Social Learning Theory. 1977.
  • Boholm A. Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research. Journal of risk research. 1998;1(2):135-63.
  • Borrelli B, Hayes RB, Dunsiger S, Fava JL. Risk perception and smoking behavior in medically ill smokers: a prospective study. Addiction. 2010;105(6):1100-8.
  • Brandon TH, Baker TB. The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1991;3(3):484.
  • Brück T, Schubert M. 2014. The Perception of Lethal Risks-Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment. Retrieved from
  • Budd GM, Preston DB. College students’ attitudes and beliefs about the consequences of smoking: Development and normative scores of a new scale. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2001;13(9):421-7.
  • Copeland AL, Brandon TH, Quinn EP. The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire-Adult: Measurement of smoking outcome expectancies of experienced smokers. Psychological Assessment. 1995;7(4):484.
  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I. 1977. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
  • Greening L. Adolescents’ Cognitive Appraisals of Cigarette Smoking: An Application of the Protection Motivation Theory 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1997;27(22):1972-85.
  • Halpern-Felsher, B., Ramos, M., & Cornell, J. (2007). Adolescents’ and young adults’ perceptions of tobacco use: a review and critique of the current literature. Ending the tobacco problem: A blueprint for the nation, 478-494.
  • Harris JK, et al. Perceptions of personal risk about smoking and health among Bosnian refugees living in the United States. Journal of immigrant and minority health. 2012;14(3):413-9.
  • Inouye J. 2014. Risk perception: Theories, strategies, and next steps. Itasca, IL: Campbell Institute National Safety Council.
  • Jacoby J, Kaplan LB. 1972. The components of perceived risk. ACR Special Volumes.
  • Kristiansen CM, Harding CM, Eiser, JR. Beliefs about the relationship between smoking and causes of death. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1983;4(3):253-61.
  • Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The common-sense representation of illness danger. Contributions to medical psychology. 1980;2:7-30.
  • McKelvey K, Baiocchi M, Halpern-Felsher B. Adolescents’ and young adults’ use and perceptions of pod-based electronic cigarettes. JAMA network open. 2018;1(6):e183535-e183535.
  • McKenna FP, Warburton DM, Winwood M. Exploring the limits of optimism: The case of smokers’ decision making. British Journal of Psychology. 1993;84(3):389-94.
  • Mettlin C. Smoking as behavior: Applying a social psychological theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1973;144-52.
  • Moffat BM, Johnson JL. Through the haze of cigarettes: Teenage girls’ stories about cigarette addiction. Qualitative Health Research. 2001;11(5):668-81.
  • Paek H-J, Hove T. 2017. Risk perceptions and risk characteristics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.
  • Power B, Neilson S, Perry IJ. Perception of the risks of smoking in the general population and among general practitioners in Ireland. Irish Journal of medical science. 2004;173(3):141.
  • Rayner S, Cantor R. How Fair Is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice 1. Risk analysis. 1987;7(1):3-9.
  • Resnicow K, et al.. Correlates of occasional cigarette and marijuana use:: are teens harm reducing? Addictive behaviors. 1999:24(2):251-66.
  • Rosa, E. A. (2003). The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF): Meta theoretical foundations and policy implications. The social amplification of risk, 47, 47-49.
  • Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health education monographs, 2(4), 328-35.
  • Salameh P, et al. Assessment of health risk behaviours among university students: a cross-sectional study in Lebanon. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 2014;19(2):203-16.
  • Schoenbaum M. Do smokers understand the mortality effects of smoking? Evidence from the Health and Retirement Survey. American Journal of Public Health. 1997;87(5):755-9.
  • Short JF. The social fabric at risk: toward the social transformation of risk analysis. American sociological review. 1984;49(6):711-25.
  • Sjöberg L, Moen B-E, Rundmo T. Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research. Rotunde publikasjoner Rotunde. 2004;84:55-76.
  • Slovic P. 2001. Smoking: Risk, perception, and policy: Sage publications.
  • Strong DR, et al Youth perception of harm and addictiveness of tobacco products: findings from the population assessment of tobacco and health study (wave 1). Addictive behaviors. 2019;92:128-35.
  • Viscusi WK. Age variations in risk perceptions and smoking decisions. The Review of Economics and Statistics.p. 577-588. 1991.
  • Viscusi WK, Hakes JK. Risk beliefs and smoking behavior. Economic Inquiry. 2008;46(1):45-59.
  • Weinstein ND. Accuracy of smokers’ risk perceptions. Annals of behavioral medicine. 1998;20(2):135-40.
  • Weinstein ND, Marcus SE, Moser RP. Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk. Tobacco Control. 2005;14(1):55-9.
  • Mahidhar BVS, et al. Medical transcription using speech recognizer. International Journal of MC Square Scientific Research. 2017;9(1):274-9.
  • White LJ, et al. Differences in head and neck cancer risk perception between smoking and nonsmoking NASCAR attendees. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2012;147(1):63-8 .
Еще
Статья научная