Investigating the consumer properties of potato cultivars
Автор: Vasyukova A.T., Belenkov A.I., Mazirov M.I., Savoskina О.А., Zavertin I.A., Moshkin A.V.
Журнал: Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий @vestnik-vsuet
Рубрика: Пищевая биотехнология
Статья в выпуске: 4 (98) т.85, 2023 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Currently, public catering establishments use technologies that do not provide for the varietal division of vegetables, in particular potatoes. This leads to excessive waste during cleaning and significant losses of nutritional value when preparing culinary products. Quick-cooking potato varieties, together with varieties of long-term processing in one culinary product, lead to the fact that half of the products are cooked, while the other half remains raw during the same time, or with longer processing. The paper considers the potato cultivars of various starch concentration grown in the central part of the country. The aim of the study is to determine the outcome of the product and the consumer properties of different potato cultivars. The objects of the investigation were the following potato cultivars: POT6 (I reproduction), POT4 (elite), POT5 (II reproduction), POT8 (II reproduction), POT3 (elite), POT12 (I reproduction), POT7 (elite), POT9 (middle early-season) and POT1 (early-season). It has been determined that POT5, POT4 and POT3 are the biggest in size (75-85 mm), but POT6 is the smallest (35 mm). But such cultivars as POT8, POT5 and POT12 are the largest in weigh (106-126 g), while POT1 and POT7 are the lightest (72 and 76 g, respectively). The potato cultivars such as POT4 (8.33%), POT12 (8.49%) and POT6 (9.1%) gave the minimum of wastes when peeling. As the investigation was carried out in April, the total amount of wastes was 5 times less if compared to the Standards of wastes and losses of food processing. It specifies the long shelflife period
Potato, nutritional value, consumer properties, shelf life, cultivar description
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/140304447
IDR: 140304447 | DOI: 10.20914/2310-1202-2023-4-49-56
Текст научной статьи Investigating the consumer properties of potato cultivars
The provision of the population with high-quality food products should be carried out on the basis of new technologies, rational use of raw materials, mechanization of labor-intensive technological operations, high consumer properties and sanitary and epidemiological safety of the final product. In the technically developed countries, potato products are sold to the population, as a rule, in the form of semifinished products of varying degrees of readiness, requiring simple technological methods with minimal labor costs. The efficiency of the applied technologies is due to the high quality of the products and the ultimate utilization of raw materials. At present, plant breeders have grown about 4,000 varieties of potatoes, and this work continues [1, 8-15].
Potato is one of the most important plant foods. In the world production of plant food, potatoes occupy the fourth place and are cultivated in more than 130 countries of the world, the annual potato harvest is about 300 million tons. The Russian Federation accounts for more than 10% of the world gross potato production [3, 16-22].
A decrease in the share of the production of commercial potatoes leads to a decrease in the commercial quality and competitiveness of domestic potatoes. In addition, due to the constant increase in electricity prices, the actual volumes of potato processing turned out to be significantly lower than it had been expected. In this regard, the amount of potato losses at all stages of its movement to the consumer in the next period of time will not change significantly. Therefore, the problem of reducing losses and preserving consumer properties is of great importance.
To successfully solve this problem, we need to formulate the consumer properties of potatoes at the growing stage and create all the necessary conditions for their preservation in the process of transportation, storage and sale of products. Only when grown from healthy, virus-free seed material of recoverable varieties, adapted to specific soil and climatic conditions, in compliance with the requirements of agricultural technology, can you get high-microbiological diseases, aging, germination and also to maximize its nutritional value.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In this regard, the improvement of the quality of potatoes is considered as an accumulation of positive properties (food components) during the production period and the achievement of the higher level of the content of these components over a long-term cultivation period.
In recent years, the starch content of potatoes has decreased, 50% of the produced potatoes do not meet the requirements of standards, 25–60% of tubers contain toxic substances (pesticides, heavy metal salts, nitrates, etc.) above the permissible levels [2]. The country's crop production is under the constant negative influence of abiotic environmental factors. As a result of stress effects caused by sharp fluctuations in weather conditions, global warming and the action of a complex of anthropogenic factors, there is a decrease in yield, keeping quality and nutritional value of crop products [4–6].
The aim of the research is to determine the yield of semi-finished products and consumer properties of various potato cultivars [7].
Based on the foregoing, it is necessary to consider the consumer properties of potatoes and the storage potential as a result of the complex interaction of many factors in the agroecosystem.
Material and Methods
Spot samples were taken from lots of unpackaged potatoes from different places of the embankment in accordance with GOST 33996–2016 Seed potatoes. Technical conditions and methods for determining quality. The size of tubers of the combined sample was measured by the largest transverse and longitudinal diameter using calibration templates and other measuring instruments in accordance with GOST 33996–2016. The assessment of keeping capacity was carried out according to the VNIIKH method, which is based on the laying of tubers by weight for storage and accounting for waste after it. Determination of starch-la content in potato tubers was carried out in accordance with GOST 7194–81. Fresh potatoes. Acceptance rules and quality determination methods. The amount of water was investigated according to ISO 760–78 "Determination of water by the Karl Fischer method (general method)", the mass fraction of protein – by the Kjeldahl method.
Results and Discussion
To identify the optimal consumer characteristics of potato cultivars, we ranked them according to the degree of maturity.
Sample 1 (POT1) – early ripening (45–50 days), common usage.
Cultivar description : ultra-early ripening, common usage. The bush is sprawling, of medium height. Stems are few in number, strongly branched. The leaves are large, strongly dissected, dark green, slightly pubescent, with sharp venation.
Abundant flowering, short-term. The inflorescence is compact, multi-flowered. Corolla reddish purple with white tips. Berry formation is absent. Tubers are short-oval with a blunt apex and a flat stolon track, pink to red. The eyes are few and small. The pulp is white, it does not darken when cut.
Characteristics of the cultivar : in the Central region, the yield is 145–324 c/ha. The maximum yield (380 c/ha) was formed in the Lipetsk region. Potential yield – 600 c/ha. The mass of the marketable tuber is 122–167 g. The starch content is 10.8–14.7%. The taste is good. Indicators during storage are 92–96%. The resistance of tubers to mechanical damage is 90%. Resistant to cancer and potato nematode.
Cultivar value : resistance to nematode, high early yield with good taste, resistance of tubers to mechanical damage and excellent storage performance.
Sample 2 (POT2) – very early maturing (55–65 days), for common consumption.
Cultivar description : Bush of medium height, intermediate type. The leaves are green, medium-intensive, medium-sized, moderately dissected. The flowers are white. Tubers are yellow, oval-round. The pulp is yellow, does not darken. The taste is good, crumbly when cooked. The mass of tubers is 130–150 g. The yield is high, 46 g/ha. Starch content is 10–12%. The shelf life is excellent.
Characteristics of the cultivar : The variety is resistant to cancer, potato nematodes, late blight. It is weakly affected by common scab and rhizoctonia.
Cultivar value : very early ripening, tubers are aligned in size, high palatability, disease resistance.
Sample 3 (POT3) – early maturing (55–65 days), common purpose.
Cultivar description : plant is low, intermediate type, semi-upright-standing. The leaf is green. The leaf is medium in size. The waviness of the edge is weak. Corolla is medium in size, reddish purple. The tuber is long and oval, with small eyes. The peel is red. The pulp is yellow. The mass of the commercial tuber is 56–102 g. The starch content is 10.1–15.6%. The taste is good.
Characteristics of the cultivar : marketable yield 164–192 c/ha, 22–106 c/ha higher than the standards of POT5 and POT1 (early). It actively forms tubers together. Productivity on the 45th day after full germination (first digging) – 84 c/ha, 24 c/ha higher than the standard of POT1 (early), on the 55th day (second digging) – 108 c/ha, 45 c/ha above the standard. The maximum yield is 270 kg / ha. Marketability 82–96%, at the level of the standards. Keeping quality is 98%. Resistant to the causative agent of potato cancer, golden potato cyst nematode. It is susceptible to late blight pathogen in tops and moderately susceptible to tubers.
Cultivar value : nematode resistance, active outcome of early production, high marketability and keeping quality of tubers.
Sample 4 (POT4) – early ripe (65–80 days), common usage.
Cultivar description : plant of medium height, intermediate type, upright or semi-upright. The leaf is large, of medium green color, the waviness of the edge is absent or very weak. Flowering is short-term. The flowers are medium in size, reddish purple with a white tip.
Characteristics of the cultivar : marketable yield 180–271 c/ha. It forms tubers together. The maximum yield is 354 c/ha. The tuber is round or short and oval, the eyes are small. The peel is smooth to medium, red. The pulp is white. The average number of tubers per bush is 11–15 pieces. Marketability is 85–90%. The mass of the marketable tuber is 60–90 g. The starch content is 15.7–16.0% up to 20%. The taste is excellent, boiled semi-crumbly. Keeping quality is 95%. It is resistant to potato cancer.
Cultivar value : high yield, early maturity, formation of early production, high taste of tubers.
Sample 5 (POT5) – early ripening (65–80 days), common purpose.
Cultivar description : early sowing, suitable for summer consumption and winter storage, common purpose. The potato bush is sprawling, low, with a lot of foliage and white inflorescences. The tubers are oval, large, with a thin smooth skin and small eyes. The mass of ripe potatoes is about 100 g. The pulp is white, the starch content is 12% of the mass of potatoes.
Characteristics of the cultivar : yield is 1500 kg per 1 ha. The high content of starch and vitamin C makes this potato variety suitable for use in many economic purposes, in food and industrial activities.
Cultivar value : it is drought-resistant, high-yielding and early ripe (the harvest can be dug in June if potatoes are planted with seedlings), does not darken when mechanically damaged. Easily tolerates cold snaps (potato safety – 98%). Potatoes are resistant to many viral diseases, late blight, cancer, rhizoctonia, rot, wrinkled mosaic, and even the Colorado potato beetle.
Sample 6 (POT6) is a mid-early common cultivar.
Cultivar description : refers to medium-early common cultivars of high yields. The cultivar is versatile and adapts well to various climatic conditions. Ripening of tubers occurs within 65–80 days after planting. You can dig potatoes for testing in 50–55 days.
Characteristics of the cultivar : the color of the shell is white; the color of the pulp is the same. The starch content is in the range of 80–140 g.
Under good growing conditions, you can easily get up to 10 tubers from 1 pile weighing 80–140 g. The yield of POT1 is up to 400 centners from 1 hectare.
Cultivar value : tubers have good commercial qualities. They have excellent taste, appearance, shelf life (up to 93%). Also, potatoes do not change their color during heat treatment or after peeling. The variety has a fairly good resistance to late blight of tops and tubers.
Sample 7 (POT7) – mid-early (80–90 days), common.
Cultivar description : mid-early common high-yielding cultivar with high marketability and excellent taste. The bush is low, compact, upright, with numerous strongly branching stems, white flowers. Tubers are round and oval in shape, with red eyes and an oval top. The peel is white, the flesh is white, does not darken during cutting, the starch content is 10.7–14.8%. The mass of the marketable tuber is 90–130 g. It is easy to wash and clean. They do not crumble during cooking. It is not recommended for frying and mashed potatoes, better in soup and salads. The tubers are well preserved.
Characteristics of the cultivar : marketability – 90–95%, yield – 38–50 t/ha. Potential productivity is up to 1.5 kg per bush. The variety is resistant to rhizoctonia, moderately resistant to late blight, common scab. Resistant to drought and waterlogging. The percentage of preservation during winter storage is good. Cultivar of intensive type, actively responds to the application of increased doses of fertilizers. It dislikes cold soils and reacts negatively to cutting tubers and breaking off sprouts. It gives good results when germinating and warming up.
Cultivar value : resistant to cancer, rhi-zoctonia, early blight and blackened stem, high yield, excellent ecological plasticity, high storage quality, good taste.
Sample 8 (POT8) – mid-early (80–90 days), common purpose.
Cultivar description : medium to tall plant, intermediate type, semi-upright. Medium to large leaf, of dark green color. The waviness of the edge is medium. The tuber is oval with small eyes. The peel is smooth and red. The pulp is creamy, does not darken when cut. Marketable yield is 220–234 c/ha (at the level of the standard of POT7 ). The maximum yield is 396 c/ha, 143 c/ha higher than the standard.
Characteristics of the cultivar: marketable yield is 220–234 kg / ha (at the level of the standard of POT7). The maximum yield is 396 c/ha, 143 c/ha higher than the standard (Moscow region). The mass of the marketable tuber is 91–133 g. The starch content is 11.9–18%. The taste is good. Marketability is 86–96%. Keeping capacity is 90%. Resistant to the causative agent of potato cancer and golden potato cyst nematode. According to the All-Russian Research Institute of Phytopathology, it is moderately susceptible in terms of tops and moderately resistant in terms of tubers to the causative agent of late blight.
Cultivar value : high yield and marketability, good taste, resistance to golden potato nematode, excellent storage.
Sample 9 (POT9) – middle-ripening (80–100 days), common usage.
Cultivar description : a bush is upright, compact and of medium height. A leaf is medium, dissected and pubescent. Flowering is average, shortterm. The inflorescence is compact and multi-flowered. Berry formation is rare. The tuber is oval, with a blunt apex and a flat stolon trace, light pink. The peel is smooth. The eyes are few and small. The pulp is white, does not darken when cut.
Characteristics of the cultivar : the cultivar is high-yielding – 51.4 t / ha in the State test. The marketability of tubers is high with good keeping quality. The mass of the marketable tuber is 83–165 g. The starch content is 12–19%, the taste is good and excellent. It is resistant to cancer, relatively resistant to late blight, common scab, moderately resistant to viruses and damping out.
Cultivar value : high yield, excellent taste, high storage quality, high marketability.
Sample 10 (POT10) – mid-season (80–100 days), for common use.
Cultivar description : bush is of medium height, semi-spreading and has dark green leaves. The flowers are blue-violet with white tips. Tubers are white, rounded, with a blunt top. The peel is mesh. Eyes are small to medium. The pulp is white, does not darken during cooking. The taste is excellent, friable when cooking. Tuber mass is 100–150 g. High-yielding, up to 50 tons and more per hectare. Starch content is 18–21%, dry matter – up to 26%, high yield marketability – up to 97%
Cultivar characteristics : the cultivar is resistant to cancer, ring and wet rot, scab, rhi-zoctonia, early blight, Y virus, relatively resistant to other potato mosaic viruses. Medium resistant to phytofluorosis. It is resistant to drought and heat. The yield is good when there is little rainfall.
In some years, hollowness is possible, it requires a thickened planting. It shows resistance to low temperatures.
Cultivar value : excellent taste, resistant to many diseases, good keeping quality of tubers.
Sample 11 (POT11) – mid-season (90–100 days), common usage.
Cultivar description : light beige tubers. The eyes are small. The pulp is white. The corolla is white. Productivity is 40–45 t / ha. Marketability is 85–94%. The mass of the marketable tuber is 100–130 g. Starch content is 13–16%. The taste is good and excellent. The tubers are well preserved.
Cultivar characteristic : resistant to viruses X and Y, early blight, heat, drought. It is medium resistant to late blight in tops and tubers, to common scab. Rhizoctonia is poorly affected.
Cultivar value : excellent taste, high yield and marketability, resistant to viral diseases, heat, drought, excellent storage.
Sample 12 (POT12) – mid-late (110–120 days), common usage.
Cultivar description : plant is tall, of leaf type, upright. Medium-sized leaf, light green. Corolla is medium in size, reddish purple. Marketable yield is 191–304 c/ha, at the level and 77 c/ha higher than the standard of POT1 .
Cultivar characteristic : oval-rounded tuber with small eyes. The peel is smooth, yellow. The pulp is white. The mass of the commercial tuber is 78–158 g. The starch content is 10.3–13.2%. The taste is good. Marketability – 84–98%. Keeping quality is 91%. Resistant to the causative agent of potato cancer, susceptible to the golden potato cyst nematode, moderately susceptible to the causative agent of late blight in the tops and tubers [10].
Cultivar value : stable yield, uniformity, drought resistance and heat resistance.
A deeper study of the ways of forming the consumer properties of potatoes at all stages of commodity circulation is facilitated by complex and multilateral studies conducted with samples of potato cultivars POT7, POT9, POT5, POT12, POT6, POT4, POT8, POT3 and POT1 . The research results are shown in Fig. 1 and 2 and in Table 1 and 2.

Figure 1. Potato cultivar “ POT9 ” – surface appearance

Figure 2. Lengthwise section of the cultivar “POT9”
Васюкова А.Т. и др. Вестник ВГУИТ, 2023, Т. 85, №. 4, С. 49-56 post@vestnik-vsuet.ru
Table 1.
Weight and size characteristics of potato tubers and amount of wastes
Cultivar |
Size |
Weight, g |
Mass of semifinished product, g |
Wastes, g, (%) |
||
length, mm |
height, mm |
width, mm |
||||
POT6 |
35 |
35 |
45 |
88 |
80 |
8 (9.1) |
POT4 |
75 |
33 |
52 |
96 |
88 |
8 (8.33) |
POT5 |
85 |
30 |
52 |
114 |
103 |
11 (9.64) |
POT8 |
67 |
40 |
62 |
126 |
113 |
13 (10.31) |
POT3 |
75 |
33 |
48 |
86 |
77 |
9 (10.46) |
POT12 |
60 |
40 |
60 |
106 |
97 |
9 (8.49) |
POT7 |
40 |
30 |
30 |
76 |
68 |
8 (10.52) |
POT9 |
53 |
35 |
40 |
82 |
72 |
10 (12.2) |
POT1 |
60 |
35 |
50 |
72 |
62 |
10 (13.9) |
Table 2.
Nutritional value of potato cultivars, grown in the Moscow region
Cultivar |
Water, % |
Proteins, % |
Starch, % |
Sugar, % |
Calories, kkal |
POT6 |
78.6 |
2,0 |
13.0–18.0 |
0.1 |
77 |
POT4 |
75.6 |
2.0 |
16.0–20.0 |
1.0 |
77 |
POT5 |
79.7 |
2.0 |
11.0–14.5 |
1.3 |
77 |
POT8 |
77.2 |
2.0 |
11.9–18.0 |
0.31 |
84 |
POT3 |
77.7 |
2.0 |
12.5–16.8 |
1.0 |
83 |
POT12 |
81.3 |
2.0 |
10.3–13.2 |
1.0 |
70 |
POT7 |
79.0 |
2.0 |
10.1–15.6 |
1.0 |
77 |
POT9 |
81.8 |
1.89 |
12.0–12.5 |
1.3 |
70 |
POT1 |
84.0 |
1.9 |
9.5–10.1 |
1.0 |
70 |
As a result of the research, it was found that the largest tubers in size are POT5, POT4 and POT 3 (75–85 mm), while the smallest one is POT6 (35 mm). But in terms of weight POT8 (126 g), POT5 (114 g) and POT12 (106 g) are classified as large, while POT1 (72 g) and POT7 (76 g) are the smallest.
While preparing semi-finished products, it was found that the minimum amount of wastes was obtained when peeling potato cultivars POT4 (8.33%), POT12 (8.49%) and POT6 (9.1%). And since the research was carried out in April, compared to the Norms of waste and losses during processing of food products, the wastes obtained during potato peeling is 5 times less than these norms. This indicates the high-quality storage of potatoes for such a long period of time.
Starch is the main potato component. Thanks to it, the vegetable gets energy value. In order not to spoil the dish, it is important to know which potato cultivars can be recommended for various dishes. With different concentration of starch in a tuber, its properties are differentiated: it is enough to cut a potato and rub the halves. Agglutination will indicate high starchiness, while the presence of liquid will speak about low content of starch. Competent selection of the appropriate potato cultivar, as well as the use of the optimal amount per serving will make the nutrition balanced and the culinary process is not complicated.
We have also analyzed the situation in the development of the food potato market and studied the factors that form the consumer properties of the product; the consumer and technological properties of economic and botanical potato cultivars have been investigated and an assessment of their competitiveness is given [8, 9].
Conclusion
Thus, a comprehensive assessment of the nutritional value, organoleptic and technological properties of promising economic and botanical potato cultivars grown in various soil and climatic conditions of the Moscow region showed that:
-
1. Cultivars POT4 and POT3 differ in higher level of accumulation of the main nutritional components and high organoleptic and technological properties;
-
2. Cultivar POT5 demonstrates high crop capacity, but differs in worse technological properties and keeping capacity;
-
3. Cultivars POT4, POT6 and POT12 are characterized with stable physiological processes at long storage that is resulted in their better keeping capacity;
-
4. Cultivars POT4, POT3 and POT7 demonstrate high marketability and keeping capacity, they are resistant to different diseases.
-
5. In terms of usage cultivars with high starch content can be divided into the following groups:
-
6. universal potato is similarly suitable both to consumption and to production of starch and other substances;
-
7. commodity potato is grown in huge amounts as it is used for sale, the starch content of this potato corresponds to the botanical potato cultivar;
-
8. commercial potato is used for production of alcohol and starch, feeding of animals;
-
9. feed potato differs in higher concentration of both starch and protein that makes it better than commercial potato.
Список литературы Investigating the consumer properties of potato cultivars
- Chashchin V.P., Gudkov А.B., Popova О.N., Odland J.Ö. et al. Description of Main Health Deterioration Risk Factors for Population Living on Territories of Active Natural Management in the Arctic. Human Ecology. 2014. no. 1. рр. 3–12. (in Russian).
- Kontorovich A.E., Korzhubaev A.G., Eder L.V. Forecast of global energy supply: Techniques, quantitative assessments, and practical conclusions. Mineral resurses. 2006. no. 5. Available at: http://www.vipstd.ru/gim/content/view/90/278/ (in Russian).
- Raskina T.A., Pirogova O.A., Zobnina O.V., Pintova G.A. Indicators of the osteoclastogenesis system in men with different clinical types of ankylosing spondylitis. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2015. vol. 9. no. 2. pp.23–27. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2015-2-23-27 (in Russian).
- Tereshchenko Yu.V. Interpretation of main indices of heart rate variability. Proceedings of Interregional Conference “The New Medical Technology at Initial Stage of Public Care”, Omsk, 10–11 April 2010. Omsk, 2010. pp. 3–11. (in Russian).
- Abdurakhmanov G.M., Lopatin I.K. Basics of Zoology and Zoogeography. Moscow, Akademiya, 2001. 496 p.
- Kondrat'ev V.B. The global pharmaceutical industry. Available at: http://perspektivy.info/rus/ekob/ globalnaja_farmacevticheskaja_promyshlennost_2011-07-18.html
- State Standard 8.586.5–2005. Method of measurement. Measurement of flow rate and volume of liquids and gases by means of orifice devices. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2007. 10 p. (in Russian).
- Pavlova M.N. Assessment of consumer properties and systematization of zoned and promising potato varieties according to areas of use for the agricultural sector. Orel, 2007. 139 p. (in Russian).
- Savina O.V., Pavlova M.N. Evaluation of tubers of zoned and promising potato varieties for suitability for industrial processing. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference of Young Scientists and Specialists “The Contribution of Young Scientists to the Development of Agrarian Science of the 21st Century”. Ryazan, 2004. pp. 408-410. (in Russian).
- Sharma C., Chambers IV.E., Sastry J., Sathuvalli V. et al. Development of a lexicon to describe the sensory characteristics of a wide variety of potato cultivars. Journal of Sensory Studies. 2020. vol. 35. no. 4. pp. e12577.
- Bough R., Holm D., Sastry J. Profiling and Putative Aroma Biomarker Identification for Flavor in Potatoes using a Trained Sensory Panel and HS-SPME GC-MS. Colorado State University, 2017.
- Oliver P., Cicerale S., Pang E., Keast R. Check all that applies as an alternative for descriptive analysis to establish flavors driving liking in strawberries. Journal of Sensory Studies. 2018. vol. 33. no. 2. pp. e12316. doi: 10.1111/joss.12316
- Cabezas-Serrano A.B., Amodio M.L., Cornacchia R., Rinaldi R. et al. Suitability of five different potato cultivars (Solanum tuberosum L.) to be processed as fresh-cut products. Postharvest Biology and technology. 2009. vol. 53. no. 3. pp. 138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.03.009
- Bali S., Patel G., Novy R., Vining K. et al. Evaluation of genetic diversity among russet potato clones and cultivars from breeding programs across the united states. PloS One. 2018. vol. 13. no. 8. pp. e0201415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201415
- Morris W.L., Taylor M.A. Improving flavor to increase consumption. American Journal of Potato Research. 2019. vol. 96. pp. 195-200. doi: 10.1007/s12230-018-09702-7
- Bowen A.J., Blake A., Tureček J., Amyotte B. External preference mapping: A guide for a consumer driven approach to apple breeding. Journal of Sensory Studies. 2019. vol. 34. no. 1. pp. e12472. doi: 10.1111/joss.12472
- Ares G., de Andrade J.C., Antúnez L., Alcaire F. et al. Hedonic product optimisation: CATA questions as alternatives to JAR scales. Food Quality and Preference. 2017. vol. 55. pp. 67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.011
- Savina O.V., Markov A.I., Pavlova M.N. Productivity and directions of use of various varieties of potatoes cultivated in the conditions of the Ryazan region. Ryazan Gazette. 2005. no. 17. pp. 3-5. (in Russian).
- Amodio M.L. et al. Implementation of rating scales for visual quality evaluation of various vegetable crops. Produce quality rating scales and color charts. Postharvest technology Center, University of California, 2007.
- Billaud C., Roux E., Brun-Merimee S., Maraschin C. et al. Inhibitory effect of unheated and heated D-glucose, D-fructose and L-cysteine solutions and Maillard reaction product model systems on polyphenoloxidase from apple. I. Enzymatic browning and enzyme activity inhibition using spectrophotometric and polarographic methods. Food Chemistry. 2003. vol. 81. no. 1. pp. 35-50. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00376-X
- Furrer A.N., Chegeni M., Ferruzzi M.G. Impact of potato processing on nutrients, phytochemicals, and human health. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. 2018. vol. 58. no. 1. pp. 146-168.
- Jaeger S.R., Antúnez L., Ares G., Swaney-Stueve M. et al. Quality perceptions regarding external appearance of apples: Insights from experts and consumers in four countries. Postharvest biology and technology. 2018. vol. 146. pp. 99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.08.014