Экономические характеристики сегмента малых научных сервисных компаний

Автор: Алексеев Андрей Алексеевич, Фомина Наталья Евгеньевна

Журнал: Известия Санкт-Петербургского государственного экономического университета @izvestia-spgeu

Статья в выпуске: 2 (128), 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

В настоящей публикации представлены результаты исследования сегмента малых научных сервисных компаний (SSSC). Исследование выполнено в рамках гранта Евросоюза (#R076 CAROTS of Interreg Baltic Sea Region, 2019-2021 гг.), направленного на изучение и развитие микро- и малых частных научных лабораторий. В рамках анализа глобальной институциональной трансформации сектора НИОКР представлена классификация сегментов и соответствующие фокусы экономических исследований. Структурный анализ панъевропейской выборки показал состоятельность тезиса о корректности выделения двух сегментов сектора НИОКР по размерности: микро- и малые (MSE); средние и крупные (A4LE). Представленные экономические характеристики национального сегмента SSSC обосновывают его ситуационное организационное оформление в национальной инновационной системе и инвестиционную привлекательность бизнес-модели частных малых научных сервисных компаний.

Еще

Инновации, экономика промышленности, ниокр, микро- и малые предприятия, научные сервисные компании

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148320256

IDR: 148320256

Список литературы Экономические характеристики сегмента малых научных сервисных компаний

Asalla L.K., Budiastuti D., Sugandi L.E., Prabowo H. The value of a corporate university case study: Binus corporate learning and development // Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems. 2020. № 12 (7 Special Issue). Р. 761-766. DOI: 10.5373/JARDCS/V12SP7/20202167
Blankesteijn M., Bossink B., van der Sijde P. Science-based entrepreneurship education as a means for university-industry technology transfer // International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11365-019-00623-3
Buenstorf G., Costa C. Drivers of spin-off performance in industry clusters: Embodied knowledge or embedded firms? // Research Policy. 2018. № 47 (3). Р. 663-673. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.015
Burhan M., Jain S.K. Management of intellectual property and technology transfer by public funded research organizations in India: A case of CSIR // Journal of Intellectual Property Rights. 2015. № 20 (6). Р. 398-410.
Cappiello G., Pedrini G. The performance evaluation of corporate universities // Tertiary Education and Management. 2017. № 23 (3). Р. 304-317. DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2017.1329452
Chen Y., Xu Y., Zhai Q. The knowledge management functions of corporate university and their evolution: case studies of two Chinese corporate universities // Journal of Knowledge Management. 2019. № 23 (10). Р. 2086-2112. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-04-2018-0228
DaraA., SangamwarA.T. Anticancer patent landscape and technology assessment of Indian public-funded research institutes and organizations // Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents. 2014. № 24 (8). Р. 893-912.
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development // EASST Review. 1995. Vol. 14. № 1. Р. 14-19.
Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Meoli, A. (2020) The effectiveness of university regulations to foster science-based entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 49 (10), статья № 104048, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104048
Gabrielsson J., Politis D., Billstrom A. University spin-offs and triple helix dynamics in regional innovation ecosystems: A comparison of technology intensive start-ups in Sweden // Global Business and Economics Review. 2019. № 21 (3-4). Р. 362-381.
Giarratana M., Torrisi S. Science-based industries and spin-offs // International Handbook on Industrial Policy, 2006. Р. 265-278.
Hecklau F., Kidschun F., Kohl H., Tominaj S. Analyzing the role of research and technology organizations (RTOs) in national innovation systems (NIS) // Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance, ECMLG 2020. 2020. Р. 95-105.
Ho J.-Y., O'Sullivan E. Key principles for integrating multiple roadmaps for innovation system foresight: Case studies of RTOs with innovation missions beyond just technology // RD PICMET 2019 - Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Technology Management in the World of Intelligent Systems, Proceedings, 2019. DOI: 10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893831
Loikkanen T., Hyytinen K., Konttinen J. Public research and technology organisations in transition - the case of Finland // Science, Technology and Society. 2011. № 16 (1). Р. 75-98.
ParryM. Science and technology parks and universities - facing the next industrial revolution // Higher Education in the Arab World: Building a Culture of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2020. Р. 109-140. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-37834-9_5
Qing Y., Qi W. Innovation ability of industry-university-research cooperation and innovation considering split-combined quadratic big data dynamic model construction // International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0020720920929659
Report CARO Business Model 2.0. The report has been compiled in accordance with the Partnership agreement between the lead partner and UNECON (St. Peterburg, Russia) for the implementation of the project # R076 CAROTS of Interreg Baltic Sea Region / Alekseev A.A. St-Petersburg State University of Economics. Preprint, 2021. https://www.carots.eu/sites/sites_custom/site_carots/content/e114136/e114480/DRAFT_CARObusiness-model.pdf.
Ricci R., Colombelli A., Paolucci E. Entrepreneurial activities and models of advanced European science and technology universities // Management Decision. 2019. № 57 (12). Р. 3447-3472. DOI: 10.1108/MD-11-2018-1237
Rodríguez-Gulías M.J., Fernández-López S., Rodeiro-Pazos D., Corsi C., Prencipe A. The role of knowledge spillovers on the university spin-offs innovation // Science and Public Policy. 2018. № 45 (6). Р. 875-883.
Rouse W.B., Lombardi J.V., Craig D.D. Modeling research universities: Predicting probable futures of public vs. Private and large vs. Small research universities // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018. № 115 (50). Р. 12582-12589.
Sattin J.-F., Hung T.-Y., Pratlong F. Negassi S., Lhuillery S. Does the relationship between innovation and competition vary across industries? Comparison of public and private research enterprises // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2019. № 28 (5). Р. 465-482.
Theeranattapong T., Pickernell D., Simms C. Systematic literature review paper: the regional innovation system-university-science park nexus // Journal of Technology Transfer. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y
Tootell A., Kyriazis E., Billsberry J., Ambrosini V., Garrett-Jones S., Wallace G. Knowledge creation in complex inter-organizational arrangements: understanding the barriers and enablers of university-industry knowledge creation in science-based cooperation // Journal of Knowledge Management. 2020. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0461
Tschanz R., Cristo S., Delgado L., Hiroz V., Jordan M., Kalt R., Mitchell I., Müller N., Roeoesli C., Tamburello V., Tauber S. "No Innovation without cooperation" - How Switzerland innovation promotes cooperation between industry, research and startups // Chimia. 2020. № 74 (10). Р. 755-757. DOI: 10.2533/CHIMIA.2020.755CHIMIA
Zylberberg E. Beyond research and technology organization (RTO) benchmarking: Towards a typology of innovation intermediaries // Innovation in Brazil: Advancing Development in the 21st Century, 2019. Р. 189-210. DOI: 10.4324/9780429053092

Еще

Статья научная