Эволюция моделей внутреннего обеспечения качества университетских онлайн-программ

Эволюция моделей внутреннего обеспечения качества университетских онлайн-программ

Автор: Корчак А. Э., Хавенсон Т. Е.

Журнал: Университетское управление: практика и анализ @umj-ru

Рубрика: Управление образовательным процессом

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.28, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Массовое распространение онлайн-формата в 2020 году определило тренд на развитие онлайн-обучения и обострило проблему оценки качества дистанционных программ высшего образования. Последовавшая за этим необходимость встраиваться в постпандемийный контекст побудила вузы разрабатывать как новые онлайн-программы, так и новые подходы к работе с их качеством. Несмотря на распространение онлайн-формата, публикаций, анализирующих эволюцию внутренних механизмов обеспечения качества в таких контекстах, недостаточно. В данном исследовании рассматривается динамика зарождения и изменения моделей внутренней оценки и обеспечения качества университетских онлайн-программ с 2009 по 2023 гг. В работе сравниваются 17 моделей, ориентированных на различные аспекты образовательного процесса, что позволяет проследить эволюцию внутренних механизмов обеспечения качества. Анализ проводится на основе параметров, выявленных в процессе изучения литературы, а также непосредственно в ходе проведения исследования. Результаты позволяют выделить три периода развития моделей: пробный, переходный и современный. Выявлены образовательные аспекты, которые присутствуют во всех моделях выборки (технологии, студентоцентрированный дизайн и преподавание в онлайн), и те, которые характерны только для части из них (разработка среды, повторное использование ресурсов, поддержка студентов, преподавателей и сотрудников, коммуникация). Приведено описание эволюции каждого из аспектов в рамках выявленных периодов, описана их связь с концептом качества в онлайн-среде. Данная работа может быть полезна исследователям в области обеспечения качества, руководителям высших учебных заведений и специалистам по образовательной политике.

Еще

Онлайн-образование, магистерские онлайн-программы, культура качества в высшем образовании, модели обеспечения качества

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/142244019

IDR: 142244019   |   DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2024.04.036

Список литературы Эволюция моделей внутреннего обеспечения качества университетских онлайн-программ

  • Misut M., Pribilová K. Measuring of Quality in the Context of e-Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 177, p p. 312 -319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.347 (In Eng.).
  • Blagg K. The Rise of Master’s Degrees: Master’s Programs Are Increasingly Diverse and Online. Urban Institute, 2018. 19 p. (In Eng.).
  • Zawacki-Richter O., Naidu S. Mapping Research Trends from 35 years of Publications in Distance Education. Distance Education, 2016, vol. 37, nr 3, pp. 245-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1185079 (In Eng.).
  • Ireland J., Mary Correia H., Griffin T. M. Developing Quality in e‐Learning: a Framework in Three Parts. Quality Assurance in Education, 2009, vol. 17, nr 3, pp. 250 -263. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880910970650 (In Eng.).
  • Britto M., Ford C., Wise J. M. Three Institutions, Three Approaches, One Goal: Addressing Quality Assurance in Online Learning. Online Learning Journal, 2013, vol. 17, nr 4. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v17i4.402 (In Eng.).
  • Программа «Современная комбинаторика» [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://omscmipt.ru (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
  • Форма № ВПО-1 Министерства высшего образования и науки РФ [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://minobrnauki.gov.ru/action/stat/highed (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
  • Хавенсон Т. Е., Корчак А. Э. Особенности функционирования цифровых кампусов и онлайн-программ магистратуры: анализ российского и зарубежного опыта. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2024. 162 с.
  • Stone C. Onli ne Lear ni ng i n Aust ralian Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges and Transformations. Student Success, 2019, vol. 10, nr 2, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i2.1299 (In Eng.).
  • Lucander H., Christersson C. Engagement for Quality Development in Higher Education: a Process for Quality Assurance of Assessment. Quality in Higher Education, 2020, vol. 26, nr 2, pp. 135-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1761008 (In Eng.).
  • Kidney G., Cummings L., Boehm A. Toward a Quality Assurance Approach to e-Learning Courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 2007, vol. 6, nr 1, pp. 17-30. (In Eng.).
  • Sun P. C., Tsai R. J., Finger G., Chen Y. Y., Yeh D. What Drives a Successful e-Learning? An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Inf luencing Lear ner Satisfaction. Computers & Education, 2008, vol. 50, nr 4, pp. 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 (In Eng.).
  • Mayer R. E. Multimedia Learning. London, Cambridge University Press, 2009, 304 p. (In Eng.).
  • Don nelli-Sallee E. Suppor t i ng O n li ne Teach i ng Effectiveness at Scale: Achieving Efficiency and Effectiveness Through Peer Review. Journal of Educators Online, 2018, vol. 15, nr 3. (In Eng.).
  • MacDonald C. J., Backhaus I., Vanezi E., Yeratziotis A., Clendinneng D., Seriola L., Papadopoulos G. A. European Union Digital Education Quality Standard Framework and Companion Evaluation Toolkit. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 2021, vol. 39, nr 1, pp. 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1936476 (In Eng.).
  • Koh J. H. L., Daniel B. K. Shifting Online During COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Teaching and Learning Strategies and Their Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2022, vol. 19, nr 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00361-7 (In Eng.).
  • COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response, Impact on Education, available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/covid-19-educational-disruption-and-response (accessed 14.10.2024). (In Eng.).
  • Rameez A., Fowsar M. A., Lu m na N. I mpact of Covid-19 on Higher Education Sectors in Sri Lanka: a Study Based on South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, available at: http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/5076 (accessed 13.10.2024). (In Eng.).
  • Alami N. H., Attieh L. K. Quality in Online Education in Lebanon During the Pandemic: Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons Learned. Quality Assurance in Higher Education in the Middle East: Practices and Perspectives, 2023, vol. 54, pp. 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120230000054006 (In Eng.).
  • Alshibani S. M., Bukhari A., Sharma R., Albishri N. A. Riding the Waves of COVID -19: A Holistic Approach to Accreditation in Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Higher Education in the Middle East: Practices and Perspectives, 2023, vol. 54, pp. 115 -142. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120230000054007 (In Eng.).
  • Fawns T., Aitken G., Jones D. Online Postgraduate Education in a Postdigital World: Beyond Technology. Springer International Publishing, 2021, 259 p. (In Eng.).
  • Ashida A., Ishizaka H. Effects of Changing from OnSite to Online Distance Classes on Graduate Students’ HelpSeeking: Lessons for Sustainable Teaching and Learning from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asia Pacif ic Education Review, 2022, vol. 23, n r 4, pp. 653- 667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09783-4 (In Eng.).
  • Alenezi M., Wa rd at S., A kou r M. T he Need of Integrating Digital Education in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, nr 6, p. 4782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782 (In Eng.).
  • Imran R., Fatima A., Salem I. E., Allil K. Teaching and Learning Delivery Modes in Higher Education: Looking Back to Move Forward post-COVID-19 Era. The International Journal of Management Education, 2023, vol. 21, n r 2, p. 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100805 (In Eng.).
  • Molina-Vásquez R. Quality of Programs with Virtual Methodology: a Masters’ Case in Colombia. Quality Assurance in Education, 2022, vol. 30, nr 4, pp. 446-463. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2021-0023 (In Eng.).
  • Salama R., Hinton T. Online Higher Education: Current Landscape and Future Trends. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2023, vol. 47, nr 7, pp. 913-924. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2200136 (In Eng.).
  • Alyoussef I. Y. Acceptance of e-Learning in Higher Education: The role of Task-Technology Fit with the Information Systems Success Model. Heliyon, 2023, vol. 9, nr 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13751 (In Eng.).
  • lić V., Kaljevic J., Jović S., Petković D., Milovančević M., Dimitrov L., Dachkinov P. Survey of Quality Models of e-Learning Systems. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2018, vol. 511, pp. 324-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.07.058 (In Eng.).
  • Hafeez M., Naureen S., Sultan S. Quality Indicators and Models for Online Learning Quality Assurance in Higher Education. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2022, vol. 20, nr 4, pp. 374-385. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.4.2553 (In Eng.).
  • Singh V., Thurman A. How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 2019, vol. 33, nr 4, pp. 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082 (In Eng.).
  • Liu I. F., Chen M. C., Sun Y. S., Wible D., Kuo C. H. Extending the TAM Model to Explore the Factors that Affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers & Education, 2010, vol. 54, nr 2, pp. 600-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009 (In Eng.).
  • Sánchez R. A., Hueros A. D. Motivational Factors that Inf luence the Acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, vol. 26, nr 6, pp. 1632-1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011 (In Eng.).
  • Cheung R., Vogel D. Predicting User Acceptance of Collabor at ive Tech nolog ies: A n Exten sion of t he Technology Acceptance Model for e-Learning. Computers & Education, 2013, vol. 63, pp. 160 -175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003 (In Eng.).
  • De Nito E., Rita Gentile T. A., Köhler T., Misuraca M., Reina R. E-learning Experiences in Tertiary Education: Patterns and Trends in Research over the Last 20 Years. Studies in Higher Education, 2023, vol. 48, nr 4, pp. 595-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2153246 (In Eng.).
  • Looyestyn J., Kernot J., Boshoff K., Ryan J., Edney S., Maher C. Does Gamification Increase Engagement with Online Programs? A Systematic Review. PloS One, 2017, vol. 12, nr 3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173403 (In Eng.).
  • Du mford A. D., Miller A. L. Online Lear ning in Higher Education: Exploring Advantages and Disadvantages for Engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 30, nr 3, pp. 452- 465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z (In Eng.).
  • MacDonald J. Blended Learning and Online Tutoring: Planning Learner Support and Activity Design. Routledge, 2017, 224 p. (In Eng.).
  • Simpson O. Supporting Students in Online, Open and Distance Learning. Routledge, 2018, 192 p. (In Eng.).
  • Borahan N. G., Ziarati R. Developing Quality Criteria for Application in the Higher Education Sector in Turkey. Total Quality Management, 2002, vol. 13, nr 7, pp. 913-926. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412022000017021 (In Eng.).
  • Vlăsceanu L., Grünberg L., Pârlea D. Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions. Bucharest, Unesco-Cepes, 2004, 120 p. (In Eng.).
  • Harvey L., Night P. T. Transforming Higher Education. Society for Research into Higher Education, 1996, 223 p. (In Eng.).
  • Harvey L., Stensaker B. Quality Culture: Understandings, Boundaries and Linkages. European Journal of Education, 2008, vol. 43, nr 4, pp. 427-442. (In Eng.).
  • Harvey L., Green D. Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1993, vol. 18, nr 1, pp. 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/026029393018010242. (In Eng.).
  • Schindler L., Puls-Elvidge S., Crawford L., Welzant H. Definitions of Quality in Higher Education: A Synthesis of the Literature. Higher Learning Research Communications, 2015, vol. 5, nr 3. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i3.244 (In Eng.).
  • Корчак А. Э., Хавенсон Т. Е. Понятие «качество» в высшем образовании: от офлайнк онлайн-формату // Высшее образование в России. 2024. Т. 33, № 1. С. 9-27. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-1-9-27
  • Bender macher G. W. G., Oude Egbrink M. G. A., Wolf hagen H. A. P., Leppink J., Dolmans D. H. J. M. Reinforcing Pillars for Quality Culture Development: a Path Analytic Model. Studies in Higher Education, 2019, vol. 44, nr 4, pp. 643-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1393060 (In Eng.).
  • Ehlers U. D. Understanding Quality Culture. Quality Assurance in Education, 2009, vol. 17, nr 4, pp. 343-363. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880910992322 (In Eng.).
  • Dzimińska M., Fijałkowska J., Sułkowski Ł. Tr ustBased Quality Culture Conceptual Model for Higher Education Instit utions. Sustainabilit y, 2018, vol. 10, nr 8, p. 2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082599 (In Eng.).
  • Simu nich B., McMahon E., Hopf L., Alt man B. Zimmerman W. Creating a Culture of Online Quality: The People, Policies, and Processes that Facilitate Institutional Change for Online Course Quality Assurance. American Journal of Distance Education, 2021, vol. 36, nr 4, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2021.2010021 (In Eng.).
  • Ossiannilsson E., Williams K., Camilleri A. F., Brown M. Quality Models in Online and Open Education around the Globe: State of the Art and Recommendations. International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE), 2015, 52 p. (In Eng.).
  • Tor raco R. J. Wr iting Integ rative Reviews of the Literature: Methods and Purposes. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 2016, vol. 7, nr 3, pp. 62-70. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAVET.2016070106 (In Eng.).
  • Brau n V., Clarke V. Using Thematic A nalysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, vol. 3, nr 2, pp. 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa (In Eng.).
  • Zhu J. Predictors of Mathematics and Science Teachers’ ICT Use in their Teaching: Results from 19 PISA Countries ERAS International Conference & WERA Focal Meeting, NTU, Singapore, 2023. (In Eng.).
  • Learning Tools Interoperability, available at: https://www.imsglobal.org/activity/learning-tools-interoperability (accessed 13.10.2024). (In Eng.).
  • SCORM, available at: https://scorm.com (accessed 13.10.2024). (In Eng.).
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp