Корпусный метод автоматического морфологического анализа флективных языков

Бесплатный доступ

Предложен метод автоматического морфологического анализа для языков флективного строя. Особенностью метода является работоспособность при отсутствии лексикона основ/псевдооснов, что достигается использованием корпуса текста на анализируемом языке.

Автоматический морфологический анализ, автоматическая обработка текста, флективный язык, корпусные методы

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147153817

IDR: 147153817

Список литературы Корпусный метод автоматического морфологического анализа флективных языков

  • Белоногов Г.Г., Кузнецов Б.А. Языковые средства автоматизированных информационных систем. М.: Наука, 1983. 288 с.
  • Шереметьева С.О. Методология минимизации усилий в инженерной лингвистике: дис.... д-ра филол. наук. СПб., 1997. 288 с.
  • Krovetz R. (2000). Viewing morphology as an inference process. In Artificial Intelligence, 118, 277-294
  • Dasgupta Sajib, Mumit Khan. (2004). Feature Unification for Morphological Parsing in Bangla. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (Dhaka, Bangladesh)
  • Attia Mohammed A. (2006). An Ambiguity-Controlled Morphological Analyzer for Modern Standard Arabic Modelling Finite State Networks. In The Challenge of Arabic for NLP/MT Conference (London, UK), 48-67
  • Paikens P. (2007). Lexicon-Based Morphological Analysis of Latvian Language. In Proceedings of the 3rd Baltic Conference on Human Language Technologies (Kaunas, Lithuania, 4-5 October, 2007), 235-240.
  • Sheremetyeva S., Nirenburg S., Nirenburg I. (1996). Generating Patent Claims From Interactive Input. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (Herstmonceux, Sussex, June 1996), 61-70
  • Mihalcea R. (2003). The Role of Non-Ambiguous Words in Natural Language Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP 2003 (September 2003, Borovetz, Bulgaria). (http://www.cse.unt.edu/~rada/papers/mihalcea.ranlp03.pdf) и др.
  • Koskenniemi K. (1990). Finite-State Parsing and Disambiguation. In Proceedings of COLING-90, Vol. 2, 229-232
  • Lauri Karttunen. (1993). Finite state constraints. In John A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Last Phonological Rule, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 173-194
  • Abney S. (1996). Part-of-speech tagging and partial parsing. In G.K. Church, S. Young (ed.), Corpus-based methods in language and speech. Kluwer academic publishers, Dordrecht
  • Dasgupta Sajib, Mumit Khan. (2004). Feature Unification for Morphological Parsing in Bangla. In Proc. 7th ICCIT
  • Beesley K.R., Karttunen L. (2003). Finite State Morphology. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2003. 505 p.
  • Attia Mohammed A. (2006). An Ambiguity-Controlled Morphological Analyzer for Modern Standard Arabic Modelling Finite State Networks. In In The Challenge of Arabic for NLP/MT Conference (London, UK), 48-67
  • Köprü Selçuk, Jude Miller. (2009). A Unification Based Approach to Morphological Analysis and Generation of Arabic. In CAASL3: Third Workshop on Computational Approaches to Arabic-Script-based Languages (Ottawa, Canada, August 426, 2009).
  • Beesley K.R. 2001. Finite-State Morphological Analysis and Generation of Arabic at Xerox Research: Status and Plans in 2001. In ACL Workshop on Arabic Language Processing: Status and Perspective (Toulouse, France), 1-8
  • Habash Nizar, Owen Rambow, and George Kiraz. (2005). Morphological Analysis and Generation for Arabic Dialects. (http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~rambow/papers/magead-ws05.pdf)
  • Mohammed Attia (2006). An Ambiguity-Controlled Morphological Analyzer for Modern Standard Arabic Modelling Finite State Networks. In The Challenge of Arabic for 6NLP/MT Conference (London, UK), 48-67.
  • Шереметьева С.О., Ниренбург С. Эмпирическое моделирование в вычислительной морфологии//НТИ. 1996. № 7
  • Белоногов Г.Г. Итоги науки и техники. Серия «Информатика». 1984. № 8.
  • Krovetz R. (2000). Viewing morphology as an inference process. In Artificial Intelligence, 118, 277-294.
  • Sheremetyeva S., Nirenburg S., Nirenburg I. (1996). Generating Patent Claims From Interactive Input. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (Herstmonceux, Sussex, June 1996), 61-70.
  • Kirby J. (2006). Minimal Redundancy in Word-Based Morphology. (http://home.uchicago.edu/~jkirby/docs/morph_rewrite.pdf)
  • Kazakov D. (1997). Unsupervised Learning of Naïve Morphology with Genetic Algorithms. In Workshop Notes of the ECML/MLnet workshop on empirical learning of Natural Language Processing Task (Prague, Czech Republic, April 1997), 105-112
  • Goldsmith J. (2001). Unsupervised Learning of the Morphology of a Natural Language. In Computational Linguistics, 27(2), 153-198.
  • Zhao, Jian, and Xiao-Long Wang. (2002). Chinese POS Tagging Based on Maximum Entropy Model. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Beijing, 4-5 November 2002, 601-605
  • Masuyama Takeshi and Hiroshi Nakagawa. (2004). Two Step POS Selection from SVM Based Text Categorization. In IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst. Special Issue on Information Processing Technology for Web Utilization, Vol. E87-D, No. 2, February 2004. (http://www.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~nakagawa/academic-res/masuyama-ieice-04.pdf)
  • Klami Mikaela, and Krista Lagus. (2006). Unsupervised Word Categorization Using Self-Organizing Maps and Automatically Extracted Morphs. In E. Corchado et al. (eds.) IDEAL 2006, LNCS 4224. -Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2006, 912-919.
  • Goldsmith, J. (2001). Unsupervised Learning of the Morphology of a Natural Language. In Computational Linguistics, 27(2), 153-198.
  • Ford A., & Singh R. (1991). Propedeutique Morphologique. Folia Linguistica, 25 (3-4), 549-575
  • Neuvel Sylvain (2002). Whole Word Morphologizer: Expanding the Word-Based Lexicon: A Nonstochastic Computational Approach. In Brain and Language 81, 454-463.
  • Бабина О.И., Дюмин Н. Ю. Нестрого аддитивный подход к автоматическому морфологическому анализу флективных языков//Материалы 5-й Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. «Наука и современность-2010». Секция «Филологические науки». -Новосибирск: Центр развития научного сотрудничества, 2010, 12-17.
Еще
Статья научная