Language testing and certification in an international context

Автор: Zelenicka Elena, Pavlova Renata, Csalova Olga, Burcl Pavol

Журнал: Интеграция образования @edumag-mrsu

Рубрика: Академическая интеграция

Статья в выпуске: 1 (110), 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. The aim of this research is to define what role continuous assessment plays in foreign language teaching. We analysed some of the most frequent communication and language mistakes by our research sample students in their written communications at the B2 level. We believe these correlations have yet to be closely studied in the context of the foreign language teaching process since there is a significant increase in the number of international students entering Slovak universities for programs implemented in the Slovak language. We also researched the current interest of our non-Slovak university students in verifying Slovak language competencies through ECL testing compared to the period before 2019 in correlation with their writing skills preparation. Materials and Methods. Our research sample included 200 randomly selected written communications by first-year international students of our University in the period of 2019-2022 in various fields of study at the age scale from 17 to 42. The students were from Russia, Serbia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Belarus, Ukraine, and the Czech Republic. We applied content analysis of the written communications concerning the most frequent mistakes from the morphological, syntactic and writing-accuracy points of view. We also used statistical methods to research the current interest in verifying foreign language competencies through ECL testing on the side of our international students. Results. The results delivered that the most frequent errors are typographical, mainly related to spelling, punctuation and paraphrasing; therefore, we can claim that in the Slovak language learning, it is significantly beneficial to focus on formal correctness, i.e. consistent acquisition of the Slovak language grammar system. We also identified the sociolinguistic adequacy of written communication problematic, i.e. style, clear statements formulations, and adherence to the text composition. The results also demonstrated the increase in our international university studentsʼ interest in verifying foreign language competencies through ECL testing compared to the period before 2019. Discussion and Conclusion. From the results it follows that teaching writing skills intensively with a focus on particularly identified problematic issues in written communications increases the learnersʼ language acquisition level. This study presents results that may be useful in the targeted language preparation of the international students recruited to Slovak universities as their home universities and their further preparation for undertaking Slovak language proficiency official verification. In addition, the results of our study may contribute to the further development of general professional education in foreign languages.

Еще

Testing, assessment, language exam, writing communications, certificate

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147240175

IDR: 147240175   |   DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.110.027.202301.155-170

Список литературы Language testing and certification in an international context

  • Bachman L.F. What Does Language Testing Have to Offer? TESOL Quarterly. 1991;25(4):671-704. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587082
  • Hamp-Lyons L. The Impact of Testing Practices on Teaching. In: Cummins J., Davison C. (eds.) International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol. 15. Springer, Boston, MA; 2007. p. 487-504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_35
  • Davies A. Fifty Years of Language Assessment. In: Kunnan A.J. (ed.). The Companion to Language Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013. p. 1-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla127
  • Fulcher G. The Communicative' Legacy in Language Testing. System. 2000;28(4):483-497. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00033-6
  • Chapelle C.A. Validity Argument for Language Assessment: The Framework Is Simple. Language Testing. 2012;29(1):19-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211417211
  • Oller J.W. Grounding the Argument-Based Framework for Validating Score Inter-Pretations and Uses. Language Testing. 2012;29(1):29-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211417212
  • Kane M. Validating Score Interpretations and Uses. Language Testing. 2012;29(1):3—17. doi: https://doi. org/10.1177/0265532211417210
  • Goundar P.R. An Overview of Language Testing. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistic Studies. 2020;4(3):161-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v4i3.230
  • Phan S. Communicative Language Testing. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series. 2008;6(1):3-10. Available at: https://hpu.edu/research-publications/tesol-working-papers/spring-2008/6_1_02Phan. pdf (accessed 17.02.2023).
  • Morrow C.K. Communicative Language Testing: Assessment and Evaluation. Types of Testing and Assessment. In: The TESOL Encyclopedia ofEnglish Language Teaching. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0383
  • Brown J.D. Standardized and Proficiency Testing: Assessment and Evaluation. Types of Testing and Assessment. In: The TESOL Encyclopedia ofEnglish Language Teaching. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0832
  • Harding L. Communicative Language Testing: Current Issues and Future Research. Language Assessment Quarterly. 2014;11(2):186-197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.895829
  • Srikaew D., Tangdhanakanond K., Kanjanawasee S. Development of an English Speaking Skill Assessment Model for Grade 6 Students by Using Portfolio. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;191:764-768. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.sbspro.2015.04.715
  • Canagarajah S. Changing Communicative Needs, Revised Assessment Objectives: Testing English as an International Language. Language Assessment Quarterly. 2006;3(3):229-242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15434311laq0303_1
  • Alderson J.C., Banerjee J. Language Testing and Assessment (Part 2). Language Teaching. 2002;35(2):79-113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444802001751
  • Shuang L. Authenticity in Language Teaching. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014;543-547:4294-4297. doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.543-547.4294
  • Halleck G., Moder C. Testing Language and Teaching Skills of International Teaching Assistants: The Limits of Compensatory Strategies. TESOL Quarterly. 1995;29(4):733-758. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588172
  • Lewkowicz J.A. Authenticity in Language Testing: Some Outstanding Questions. Language Testing. 2000;17(1):43-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700102
  • Hasrol S.B., Zakaria A., Aryadoust V A Systematic Review of Authenticity in Second Language Assessment. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. 2022;1(3):100023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100023
  • Burton D. "How Scripted is this Going to Be?" Raters' Views of Authenticity in Speaking-Performance Tests. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal. 2020;17(3):244—261. doi: https://doi.org/10.10 80/15434303.2020.1754829
  • Hoekje B., Linnell K. "Authenticity" in Language Testing: Evaluating Spoken Language Tests for International Teaching Assistants. TESOL Quarterly. 1994;28(1):103-126. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587201
Еще
Статья научная