Mediation settlement agreement under the Singapore convention as a cross-border restructuring instrument
Автор: Đuro Đurić, Vladimir Jovanović, Sanja Škorić
Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa @pravni-fakultet
Рубрика: Original scientific work
Статья в выпуске: 3 vol.41, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Since its adoption, the UN Convention on Mediation has been signed by 58 states. It provides an important legal framework for resolving commercial disputes and allows for the cross-border enforcement of such agreements. The less formal, less expensive, and more confidential nature of the process makes its use even more attractive to potential parties compared to other instruments. Once a settlement agreement is reached, the Convention also enables the parties to enforce it without the need for complex recognition proceedings. Due to these characteristics, mediation can be used as an instrument for restructuring and preventing insolvency. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the advantages of using mediation in cross-border restructuring under the rules set by the UN Convention on Mediation. The authors analyze the application of mediation agreements in practice throughout each stage of the process, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of mediation and their effects on cross-border restructuring proceedings. This paper employs dogmatic, normative, comparative, and case study methods.
Singapore Convention, settlement agreement, mediation, cross-border proceedings, restructuring
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170205787
IDR: 170205787 | DOI: 10.5937/ptp2403001D
Список литературы Mediation settlement agreement under the Singapore convention as a cross-border restructuring instrument
- Anderson, D. Q. (2015). Litigating over mediation—how should the courts enforce mediated settlement agreements? Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 105–134. Downloaded 2024, July 07 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24872274
- Bartol G. (1920). Capacity to Contract in Private International Law, University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 68(4), pp. 380–383. doi.org/10.2307/3694204
- Bonell, M. J. (2018). The law governing international commercial contracts and the actual role of the Unidroit Principles. Uniform Law Review, 23(1) pp. 15–41, https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/uny001
- Carballo, P., L., & Fach G., K. (2017). Comparative and International Perspectives on Mediation in Insolvency Matters: An Overview. TDM, 4 (Special Issue), pp. 1–8. Downloaded 2024, July 15 from www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2488#_ftn3
- Čolović, V. (2023). Finansijsko restrukturiranje privrednih subjekata [Financial restructuring of economic entities] Pravo i privreda, 61(2), pp. 297–314. doi: 10.55836/PiP_23204A
- Mokal, R. et al. (2018). Micro, small, and medium enterprise insolvency – A modular approach. Oxford University Press
- Đurić, Đ., & Jovanović, V. (2019). “Too big to fail”? The Agrokor case and its impact on West Balkan economies. International Insolvency Review, 28(1), pp. 22–43
- Đurić, Đ., & Jovanović, V. (2020). Pravni instrumenti rešavanja korporativne krize. [Legal instruments for solving the corporate crisis]. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe, Univerzitet Privredna akademija
- Đurić Đ., & Jovanović V. (2023). Primena medijacije kod restrukturiranja. [Application of mediation in restructuring]. Pravo i privreda, 61(2), pp. 438–456. doi: 10.55836/PiP_23210A
- Đurić Đ., & Jovanović V. (2023). Novi instituti u nemačkom stečajnom pravu [New institutes in German insolvency law]. Strani pravni život, 67(1), pp. 55–74. doi: 10.56461/SPZ_23104KJ
- Eidenmüller, H., & Griffiths, D. (2009). Mediation in Cross Border Insolvency Procedures. Downloaded 2024, July 07 from www.gforensics.com/resources/CrossBorderMediation.pdf
- Esher J. (2015). Recent Use of Mediation for Resolution and Effective Managementof Large Case Insolvencies. International Corporate Rescue 12(6), pp. 1–4
- Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E. A., Rogers, N.H., Cole, S. R. (2003). Dispute Resolution, Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes. New York: Aspen Law & Business
- Kınıkoğlu, E., Parmaksız, Y., & Solak, H. (2020). Mediation Q&A: Turkey, Practical Law Country Q&A. Downloaded 2024, July 07 from https://moral.av.tr/Uploads/Pdf/Mediation_qa_Turkey.pdf
- Knežević, G., & Pavić, V. (2017). Međunarodno privatno parvo [International private law]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
- Koo, A. K. C. (2016). Enforcing International Mediated Settlement Agreements. In: Harmonising Trade Law to Enable Private Sector Regional Development, (pp. 81–96). New Zealand: UNCITRAL Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific and New Zealand Association for Comparative Law, Downloaded 2024, July 07 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3102147
- Leandro, A. (2017). Insolvency, jurisdiction and vis attractiva. In: J. Basedow et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of International Private Law, (pp. 947–954), Elgaronline, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782547235
- Lepetić, J. (2020). Osporena potraživanja i medijacija u srpskom stečajnom pravu – de lege lata i de lege ferenda [Disputed claims and mediation in Serbian insolvency law: De lege lata and de lege ferenda]. Pravo i privreda, 58(3), pp. 156–176
- Madaus, S. (2018). Leaving the Shadows of US Bankruptcy Law: A Proposal to Divide the Realms of Insolvency and Restructuring Law. European Business Organization Law Review, 19(3), pp. 615–647
- Madaus, S. (2021). The Cross-border Effects of Restructuring – Principles for Improved Cross-border Restructuring Laws, Downloaded 2024, July 07 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4045334
- Mulder, C. (2017). Commercial Mediation: The United States and Europe. The view through practitioners’ eyes. Dispute Resolution Magazine, 24, pp. 8–13
- Meidanis, H. (2020). Enforcement of mediation settlement agreements in the EU and the need for reform. Journal of Private International Law, 16(2), p. 275–299
- Peters, N. (2019). The enforcement of mediation agreements and settlement agreements resulting from mediation. Corporate Mediation Journal (1-2), pp. 13–19
- Schnabel, T. (2019). The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Framework for the Cross-Border Recognition and Enforcement of Mediated Settlements. Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 19(1), pp. 1–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3239527
- World Bank Group (2022). A Toolkit for Corporate Workouts. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
- The World Bank Revised Principles for Effective Insolvency and Creditor/ Debtor Regimes and UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law, 20 January 2011, Principle B4.3
- United Kingdom Commercial Court Guide and Circuit Commercial Court Guide from February 2022, Downloaded 2024, July 07 from https://www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/new-editions-of-the-commercialcourt-guide-and-circuit-commercial-court-guide-published/
- Walters, A. (2015). Giving Effect to Foreign Restructuring Plans in AngloU.S. Private International Law. 3. Nottingham Insolvency and Business Law e-Journal, pp. 375–392
- Wessels, B., Madaus S., & Boon, G.-J. (2017). Rescue of Business in Insolvency Law. Instrument of the European Law Institute. Vienna: Mediation in civil and commercial law matters
- Wessels, B., & Madaus, S. (2018). Business Rescue in Insolvency Law in Europe: Introducing the ELI Business Rescue Report. International Insolvency Review, 22(2), pp. 255–280
- Zukauskaite, M. (2019). Enforcement of Mediated Settlement Agreements. TeiseVilnus University Journal, 111, pp. 205–217. doi:10.15388/Teise.2019.111.12
- United Nation Convention on International Settlement resulting from Mediation (adopted on 20 December 2018, entered into force on 12 September 2020), Downloaded 2024, July 07 from www.singaporeconvention.org/jurisdictions