Методы выделения и очистки ДНК из лизатов клеток (обзор)

Петров Д.Г. Макарова Е.Д. Гермаш Н.Н. Антифеев И.Е.

Журнал: Научное приборостроение @nauchnoe-priborostroenie

Рубрика: Приборостроение физико-химической биологии

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.29, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

В представленном обзоре рассмотрены методы выделения и очистки ДНК из лизатов клеток, классифицированные по основным принципам и конкретным средствам, использованным с этой целью. Изложены известные на сегодняшний день преимущества, особенности использования и возможные ограничения для ПЦР-анализа. Использованные материалы включают как обзорные публикации, так и ряд "старых" работ, которые до сих пор не потеряли своей актуальности и являются основой для разработки современных нестандартных методов выделения и очистки ДНК.

нуклеиновые кислоты \ выделение ДНК \ очистка ДНК \ двуокись кремния \ магнитные частицы \ спин-колонки \ жидкофазные методы \ nucleic acid \ DNA isolation \ DNA purification \ silicon dioxide \ spin column \ magnetic particles \ chelex \ liquid phase methods

Похожие статьи в разделе Аналитическая химия

Полимеразная цепная реакция: приборная и методическая реализация. Обзор аналитических характеристик
Полимеразная цепная реакция: приборная и методическая реализация. Обзор аналитических характеристик

Антонова Ольга Сергеевна, Рудницкая Г.Е., Тупик А.Н., Буляница А.Л., Евстрапов А.А., Курочкин В.Е.

Сравнительный анализ эффективности методов экстракции ДНК из тканей животных
Сравнительный анализ эффективности методов экстракции ДНК из тканей животных

Филиппова Ася Вячеславовна, Рябухина Мария Владимировна, Одиноков Георгий Николаевич, Карпова Наталья Григорьевна

Оптимизация техники выделения ДНК из крови и спермы
Оптимизация техники выделения ДНК из крови и спермы

Ахметов Т.М., Тюлькин С.В., Нургалиев Ф.М.

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/142221438

IDS: 142221438   |   УДК: 543.054, 543.062   |   DOI: 10.18358/np-29-4-i2850

Список литературы Методы выделения и очистки ДНК из лизатов клеток (обзор)

  • Hedman J., Knutsson R., Ansell R., et al. Pre-PCR processing in bioterrorism preparedness: improved diagnostic capabilities for laboratory response networks. Biosecur. Bioterror, 2013, vol. 11, suppl. 1, pp. S87–S101. DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0090.
  • Kralik P., Ricchi M.A. Basic guide to real time PCR in microbial diagnostics: definitions, parameters, and everything // Front. Microbiol. 2017. Vol. 8: 108. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00108
  • Бочкарев Е.Г., Денисова Т.С., Генерозов Э.В. и др. Генодиагностика во фтизиатрии. М.: 2000, 15 c.
  • Doebler R.W., Erwin B., Hickerson A., et al. Continuousflow, rapid lysis devices for biodefense nucleic acid diagnostic systems // JALA. 2009, June. P. 119–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jala.2009.02.010
  • Martzy R., Kolm C., Krska R. et al. Challenges and perspectives in the application of isothermal DNA amplification methods for food and water analysis // Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019. Vol. 411. P. 1695–1702. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1553-1
  • Rantakokko-Jalava K., Jalava J. Optimal DNA isolation method for detection of bacteria in clinical specimens by broad-range PCR // J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002. Vol. 40, no. 11. P. 4211–4217. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.42114217.2002
  • Thatcher S.A. DNA/RNA Preparation for molecular detection // Clin. Chem. 2015. Vol. 61, no. 1. P. 89–99. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.221374
  • Islam M.S., Aryasomayajula A., Selvaganapathy P.R. A review on macroscale and microscale cell lysis methods // Micromachines. 2017. Vol. 8, is. 3: 83. DOI: 10.3390/mi8030083
  • Rudi K., Jakobsen K.S. Overview of DNA purification for nucleic acid-based diagnostics from environmental and clinical samples // Methods in Molecular Biology. 2006. Vol. 345. P. 23–35. DOI: 10.1385/1-59745-143-6:23
  • Burden D. Guide to the Disruption of Biological Samples // Random Primers. 2012. Vol. 25, no. 12. P. 1–25. URL: https://opsdiagnostics.com/applications/homogenization_g uide_download.htm
  • Gibbons L.E., Brangs H.C.G., Burden D.W. Bead Beating: A Primer (OPS Diagnostics, LLC) // Random Primers. 2014, no. 12. URL:https://opsdiagnostics.com/notes/ranpri/OPSD_Bead _Beating_Primer_2014%20v1.pdf
  • Elphinstone J., Griffiths B., Goddard M., Stockdale E. Soil biology and soil health health partnership. Project 3: Molecular approaches for routine soil-borne disease and soil health assessment – establishing the scope. Research Review. no. 91140002-03. BBRO, 2018. 37 p. URL: https://cereals.ahdb.org.uk/media/1362039/91140002final-report-03pdf.pdf
  • Bakken L.R., Frostegård A. Nucleic acid extraction from soil // Nucleic acids and proteins in soil. Eds. P. Nannipieri, K. Smalla. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006. P. 49–73.
  • Лопухов Л.В., Эйдельштейн М.В. Полимеразная цепная реакция в клинической микробиологической диагностике // Клиническая микробиология и антимикробная терапия. 2000. Т. 2, № 3. С. 96–106. URL: https://cmac-journal.ru/publication/2000/3/cmac-2000t02-n3-p096/cmac-2000-t02-n3-p096.pdf
  • Vaneechoutte M., Van Eldere J. The possibilities and limitations of nucleic acid amplification technology in diagnostic microbiology // J. Med. Microbiol. 1997. Vol. 46. P. 188–194. DOI: 10.1099/00222615-46-3-188
  • Hedman J., Rådström P. Overcoming inhibition in realtime diagnostic PCR // Meth. Mol. Biol. 2013. Vol. 943. P. 17–48. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-353-4_2
  • Schrader C., Schielke A., Ellerbroek L., Johne R. PCR inhibitors — occurrence, properties and removal // J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012. Vol. 113. P. 1014–1026. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x
  • Wilson I.G. Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification // Appl. Environ. Microbiology. 1997. Vol.63, no. 10. P. 3741–3751. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC168683/
  • Rådström P., Knutsson R., Wolffs P., et al. Pre-PCR processing: Strategies to generate PCR-compatible samples // Mol. Biotechnol. 2004. Vol. 26. P. 133–146. DOI: 10.1385/MB:26:2:133
  • Bessetti J. An introduction to PCR inhibitors // Promega Corporation. Profiles in DNA. 2007. Vol. 10, is. 1. P. 9–10. URL: https://www.promega.es//media/files/resources/profiles-in-dna/1001/anintroduction-to-pcr-inhibitors.pdf?la=es-es
  • Matheson C.D., Gurney C., Esau N., Lehto R. Assessing PCR inhibition from humic substances // The open enzyme inhibition J. 2010. Vol. 3. P. 38–45. DOI: 10.2174/1874940201003010038
  • Demeke T., Jenkins G.R. Influence of DNA extraction methods, PCR inhibitors and quantification methods on realtime PCR assay of biotechnology-derived traits // Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010. Vol. 396. P. 1977–1990. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-3150-9
  • Hu Q, Liu Y, Yi S, Huang D. The effect of six common PCR inhibitors on DNA polymerase and DNA template // Int. J. Forensic Sci. Pathol. 2014. Vol. 2, no. 8. P. 1–4. DOI: 10.19070/2332-287X-1400017
  • Sidstedt M., Jansson L., Nilsson E., et al. Humic substances cause fluorescence inhibition in real-time polymerase chain reaction // Anal. Biochem. 2015. Vol. 487. P. 30–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.07.002
  • Sidstedt M., Hedman J., Romsos E.L., et al. Inhibition mechanisms of hemoglobin, immunoglobulin G, and whole blood in digital and real-time PCR // Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018. Vol. 410, is. 10. P. 2569–2583. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-0931-z
  • Moore D.D., Chory J., Ribaudo R.K. Isolation and purification of large DNA restriction fragments from agarose gels // Current Protocols in Immunology. 1993. Vol. 8, is. 1. P. 10.5.1–10.5.12. DOI: 10.1002/0471142735.im1005s08
  • Moore E., Arnscheidt A., Krüger A., et al. Simplified protocols for the preparation of genomic DNA from bacterial cultures // Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual, 2nd Ed. 1.01: 2004. P. 3–18.
  • Tan S.C., Yiap B.C. DNA, RNA, and protein extraction: The past and the present // J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2009. Vol. 2009. 574398. DOI: 10.1155/2009/574398
  • Антонова О.С., Корнева Н.А., Белов Ю.В., Курочкин В.Е. Эффективные методы выделения нуклеиновых кислот для проведения анализов в молекулярной биологии (Обзор) // Научное приборостроение. 2010. Т. 20, № 1. С. 3–9. URL: http://iairas.ru/mag/2010/full/Art1.pdf
  • Palomo F.S., Celle Rivero M.G., Quiles M.G., et al. Comparison of DNA extraction protocols and molecular targets to diagnose tuberculous meningitis // Tuberculosis Res. Treat. 2017. Vol. 2017. 5089046. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5089046
  • Purdy K.J. Nucleic acid recovery from complex environmental samples // Method Enzymol. 2005. Vol. 397. P. 271–292. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S00766879(05)97016-X
  • Ali N., de Cássia Pontello Rampazzo R., Costa A.D.T., Krieger M.A. Current Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods and Their Implications to Point-of-Care Diagnostics // BioMed Research Int. 2017. Vol. 2017. 9306564. DOI: 10.1155/2017/9306564
  • Chacon-Cortes D., Griffiths L. Methods for extracting genomic DNA from whole blood samples: current perspectives // J. Biorepository Science for Applied Medicine. 2014. Vol. 2. P. 1–9. DOI: 10.2147/BSAM.S46573
  • Barbosa C., Nogueira S., Gadanho M., Chaves S. DNA extraction: finding the most suitable method // Molecular Microbial Diagnostic Methods: Pathways to Implementation for the Food and Water Industries. Chapter 7. Elsevier Inc., 2016. P. 135–154.
  • Zaveri P., Patel R., Patel M. Patel M., Sarodia D., Munshi N.S. Modification of extraction method for community DNA isolation from salt affected compact wasterland soil samples // MethodsX. 2017. Vol. 4. P. 63–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2017.01.002
  • Lee S.B., Shewale J.G. DNA Extraction methods in forensic analysis // Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, 2017. P. 1–18. DOI: 10.1002/9780470027318.a1104m
  • Cheng H.-R., Jiang N. Extremely rapid extraction of DNA from bacteria and yeasts // Biotechnol. Lett. 2006. Vol. 28, no. 1. P. 55–59. DOI: 10.1007/s10529-005-4688-z
  • Zhang R., Gong H.-Q., Zeng X. et al. A Microfluidic liquid phase nucleic acid purification chip to selectively isolate DNA or RNA from low copy/single bacterial cells in minute sample volume followed by direct on-chip quantitative PCR assay // Anal. Chem. 2013. Vol. 85, no. 3. P. 1484–1491. DOI: 10.1021/ac3026509
  • Chomczynski P., Mackey K., Drews R., Wilfinger W. DNAzol: A reagent for the rapid isolation of Genomic DNA // BioTechniques. 1997. Vol. 22, no. 3. P. 550–553. DOI: 10.2144/97223pf01
  • Rodriguez-Garcia A., Mares R.E., Muñoz P.L.A., et al. DNA extraction with DNAzol and LAMP, performed in a
  • heating block as a simple procedure for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens // Methods and Protoc. 2018. Vol. 1, is. 4. 37. DOI: 10.3390/mps1040037
  • Ligozzi M., Fontana R. Isolation of total DNA from bacteria and yeast // Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2003. Vol. 2, no. 8. P. 251–253. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2003.000-1052
  • Kissoudi M., Samanidou V. Recent Advances in applications of ionic liquids in miniaturized microextraction techniques // Molecules. 2018. Vol. 23, is. 6. 1437. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23061437
  • Fuchs-Telka S., Fister S., Mester P-J., et al. Hydrophobic ionic liquids for quantitative bacterial cell lysis with subsequent DNA quantification // Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017. Vol. 409, no. 6. P. 1503–1511. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-016-0112-x
  • Ведерников В.Е. Сравнительная характеристика способов экстракции нуклеиновых кислот // Лаборатория. 2012. № 4. С. 14–15. URL: http://www.alkorbio.ru/download.php?d=84&is=doc
  • Аукенов Н.Е., Масабаева М.Р., Хасанова У.У. Выделение и очистка нуклеиновых кислот. Состояние проблемы на современном этапе // Наука и здравоохранение. 2014. № 1. С. 51–53.
  • Madhad V.J., Sentheil K.P. The rapid & non-enzymatic isolation of DNA from the human peripheral whole blood suitable for genotyping // Eur. J. Biotechnol. Biosci. 2014. Vol. 1, is. 3. P. 1–16. URL: http://www.biosciencejournals.com/vol1/issue3/26.html
  • Sakyi S.A., Kumi B., Ephraim R.D., et al. Modified DNA extraction technique for use in resource-limiting settingth: Comparison of salting out methods versus QIAamp blood mini kit // Ann. Med. Health Sci. Res. 2017. Vol. 7, is. 3. P. 131–136. URL: https://www.amhsr.org/articles/modified-dnaextraction-technique-for-use-in-resourcelimited-settingscomparison-of-salting-out-methods-versus-qiaamp-bl.pdf
  • Al-Shuhaib M.B.S. A minimum requirements method to isolate large quantities of highly purified DNA from one drop of poultry blood // J. Genetics. 2018. Vol. 97. P. 87–94. DOI: 10.1007/s12041-018-0983-z
  • Wells D.A., Herron L.L. Automation of sample preparation for genomics // LC·GC Europe. 2002. Vol. 15, no. 11. P. 712–720.
  • Boom R., Sol C.J., Salimans M.M., et al. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids // J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990. Vol. 28, no. 3. P. 495–503. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC269651/p df/jcm00051-0103.pdf
  • Zähringer H. Don’t lose the thread. Product survey: Manual DNA extraction kits // Lab Times. 2012. no. 6. P. 52–56.
  • Li J.-F., Li L., Sheen J. Protocol: a rapid and economical procedure for purification of plasmid or plant LNA with diverse applications in plant biology // Plant Methods. 2010. Vol. 6, is. 1. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4811-6-1
  • Huanca-Mamani W., Rivera-Cabello D., Maita-Maita J. A simple, fast and inexpensive CTAB-PVP-silica based method for genomic DNA isolation from single, small insect larvae and pupae // Genetics and Molecular Res. 2015. Vol. 14, no. 3. P. 8001–8007. DOI: 10.4238/2015.July.17.8
  • Rohland N., Hofreiter M. Comparison and optimization of ancient DNA extraction // BioTechniques. 2007. Vol. 42. P. 343–352. DOI: 10.2144/000112383
  • Devi S.G., Fathima A.A., Radha S. et al. A rapid and economical method for efficient DNA extraction from divers soils suitable for metagenomic applications // PLoS ONE. 2015. Vol. 10, no. 7. e0132441. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132441
  • Wang X., Xing L., Shu Y., et al. Novel polymeric ionic liquid microspheres with high exchange capacity for fast extraction of plasmid DNA // Anal. Chim. Acta. 2014. Vol. 837. P. 64–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.06.002
  • Shakhmaeva I.I., Bulatov E.R., Bondar O.V., et al. Binding and purification of plasmid DNA using multilayered carbon nanotubes // J. Biotechnol. 2011. Vol. 152, no. 3. P. 102–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.01.022
  • Topҫu A.A., Aȿir S., Türkmen D. DNA purification by solid phase extraction (SPE) methods // Hacettepe J. Biol. & Chem. 2016. Vol. 44, is. 3. P. 259–266. URL: http://www.hjbc.hacettepe.edu.tr/site/assets/files/4121/08259-266.pdf
  • Nacham O., Clark K.D., Anderson J.L. Extraction and purification of DNA from complex biological sample matrices using solid-phase microextraction coupled with real-time PCR // Anal. Chem. 2016. Vol. 88. P. 7813– 7820. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/093b/da2eddf068f83212b 7517dcabe796d8c25f9.pdf
  • Holmberg R.C., Gindlesperger A., Stokes T., et al. Akonni TruTip® and Qiagen® methods for extraction of fetal circulating DNA — evaluation by real-time and digital PCR // PLoS One. 2013. Vol. 8, no. 8. e73068. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073068
  • Frickmann H., Hinz R., Hagen R.M. Comparison of an automated nucleic acid extraction system with the columnbased procedure // Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015. Vol. 5, no. 1. P. 94-102. DOI: 10.1556/EUJMI-D-1400040
  • Mandal G., Das S., Padmanabhan S. Development of a membrane-based method for isolation of genomic DNA from human blood // J. Biomol. Techniques. 2018. Vol. 29, is. 3. P. 46–53. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865945/
  • Beall S.G., Cantera J., Diaz M.H., et al. Performance and workflow assessment of six nucleic acid extraction technologies for use in resource limited settings // PLoS ONE. 2019. Vol. 14, no. 4. e0215753. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215753
  • Thakore N., Garber S., Bueno A., et al. A bench-top automated workstation for nucleic acid isolation from clinical sample types // J. Microbiol. Methods. 2018. Vol. 148. P. 174–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.03.021
  • Holmberg R.C., Gindlesperger A., Stokes T., et al. Highthroughput, automated extraction of DNA and RNA from clinical samples using TruTip technology on common liquid handling robots // J. Vis. Exp. 2013. Vol. 76. e50356. DOI: 10.3791/50356
  • Bag S., Saha B., Mehta O., et al. An improved method for high quality metagenomics DNA extraction from human and environmental samples // Sci. Rep. 2016. Vol. 6. 26775. DOI: 10.1038/srep26775
  • Zhou Y., Zhang Y., He W., et al. Rapid regeneration and reuse of silica columns from PCR purification and gel extraction kits // Sci. Rep. 2018. Vol. 8. 12870. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30316-w
  • Shi R., Lewis R.S., Panthee D.R. Filter paper-based spin column method for cost-efficient DNA or RNA purification // PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13, no 12. e0203011. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203011
  • Shipley M.A., Koehler J.W., Kulesh D.A., Minogue T.D. Comparison of nucleic acid extraction platforms for detection of select biothreat agents for use in clinical resource limited settings // J Microbiol. Methods. 2012. Vol. 91, no. 1. P. 179–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.06.008
  • UNITAID. Tuberculosis. Diagnostics technology landscape. 5th edition. Geneva, 2017. 90 p. URL: http://unitaid.org/assets/2017-Unitaid-TB-DiagnosticsTechnology-Landscape.pdf
  • Thakore N., Norville R., Franke M., et al. Automated TruTip nucleic acid extraction and purification from raw sputum // PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13, no. 7. e0199869. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199869
  • Akonni Biosistems. Inc.TruTip® Automated Workstation. URL: https://akonni.com/technology/sample-prep/
  • Poh J.-J., Gan K.-E. The determination of factors involved in column-based nucleic acid extraction and purification // J. Bioproces. Biotechniq. 2014. Vol. 4, no. 3. 1000157. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9821.1000157
  • Katevatis C., Fan A., Klapperich C.M. Low concentration DNA extraction and recovery using a silica solid phase // PLOS One. 2017. Vol. 12, no. 5. e0176848. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176848
  • Петров Д.Г., Макарова Е.Д., Корнева Н.А., Альдекеева А.С., Князьков Н.Н. Воздействие полей разной природы на выход ДНК при выделении из модельных растворов на двуокиси кремния. 1. Влияние температуры // Научное приборостроение 2015. Т. 25, № 2. С. 91–101. URL: http://iairas.ru/mag/2015/full2/Art9.pdf
  • Петров Д.Г., Макарова Е.Д., Антифеев Н.Е. и др. Воздействие полей разной природы на выход ДНК при выделении из модельных растворов на двуокиси кремния. Влияние ультразвука // Научное приборостроение 2017. Т. 27, № 4. С. 40–55. URL: http://iairas.ru/mag/2017/full4/Art6.pdf
  • Kathiravan M.N., Gim G.H., Ryu J., et al. Enhanced method for microbial community DNA extraction and purification from agricultural yellow loess soil // J. Microbiol. 2015. Vol. 53, no. 11. P. 767–775. DOI: 10.1007/s12275015-5454-0
  • Tan S.C., Ong C.E., Hay Y.K., Yiap B.C. Cellulose and its application in biomolecules purification // Intl. Res. J. Appl. Basic Sci. 2013. Vol. 7, no. 5. P. 267–276.
  • Zou Y., Mason M.G., Wang Y. et al. Nucleic acid purification from plants, animals and microbes in under 30 seconds // PLoS Biology. 2017. Vol. 15, no. 11. e2003916. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003916
  • Bangs Laboratories, Inc. Magnetic microspheres. TechNote 102. URL: https://www.bangslabs.com/sites/default/files/imce/docs/T echNote%20102%20Web.pdf
  • Rudi K., Kroken M., Dahlberg O.J., et al. Rapid, universal method to isolate PCR-ready DNA using magnetic beads // Bio Techniques. 1997. Vol. 22, no. 3. P. 506–511. DOI: 10.2144/97223rr01
  • Deggerdal A., Larsen F. Rapid isolation of PCR-ready DNA from blood, bone marrow and cultured cells, based on paramagnetic beads // BioTechniques. 1997. Vol. 22, no. 3. P. 554–557. DOI: 10.2144/97223pf02
  • Stemmer C., Beau-Faller M., Pencreach E., et al. Use of magnetic beads for plasma cell-free DNA extraction: Toward automation of plasma DNA analysis for molecular diagnostics // Clin. Chem. 2003. Vol. 49, no 11. P. 1953– 1955.
  • Romeika J.M., Yan F. Recent Advances in Forensic DNA Analysis // J. Forensic Res. 2013. S12. 001. 13 p. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7145.S12-001
  • Gong R., Li S. Extraction of human genomic DNA from whole blood using a magnetic microsphere method // Int. J. Nanomed. 2014. Vol. 9. P. 3781–3789. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S59545
  • Haddad Y., Xhaxhiu K., Kopel P., et al. The isolation of DNA by polycharged magnetic particles: an analysis of the interaction by Zeta potential and particle size // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016. Vol. 17, is. 4. P. 550–561. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17040550
  • Saiyed Z.M., Ramchand C.N., Telang S.D. Isolation of genomic DNA using magnetic nanoparticles as a solid-phase support // J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2008. Vol. 20, no. 20. 204153. DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/20/204153
  • Niemirowicz K., Wilczewska A.Z., Car G. Magnetic nanoparticles as separators of nucleic acids // Chemik. 2013. Vol. 67, no. 10. P. 836–841.
  • Yi L., Huang Y., Wu T., Wu J. A magnetic nanoparticlesbased method for DNA extraction from the saliva of stroke patients // Neural Regeneration Research. 2013. Vol. 8, no. 32. P. 3036–3046. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.16735374.2013.32.007
  • Sirdah M.M. Superparamagnetic–bead based method: An effective DNA extraction from dried blood spots (DBS) for diagnostic PCR // J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014. Vol. 8, no. 4. P. FC01–FC04. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8171.4226
  • Sawant D.V., Bohara R.A., Patil R.S., Pawar S.H. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from pulmonary sputum sample using SPION mediated DNA extraction method // Res. J. Life Sci., Bioinformatics, Pharm. Chem. Sci. (RJLBPCS). 2018. Vol. 4, no. 1. P. 91–105. DOI: 10.26479/2018.0401.08
  • Chiang C.L., Sung C.S., Wu T.F., et al. Application of superparamagnetic nanoparticles in purification of plasmid DNA from bacterial cells // J. Chromatogr. B. Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2005. Vol. 822, no. 1-2. P. 54–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.05.017
  • Danthanarayana A.N., Manatunga D.C., de Silva R.M., et al. Magnetofection and isolation of DNA using polyethylenimine functionalized magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles // R. Soc. Open. Sci. 2018. Vol. 5, is. 12. 181369. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181369
  • Volkova N.N., Derjabin O.N., Yanishpolskii V.V., Dudchenko N.O. Isolation of ultrapure plasmid DNA from bacterial cells with silica-magnetite nanoparticles // Annales. Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Lublin – Polonia. Sectio AA. 2007. Vol. LXII, no. 22. P. 250–260. URL: http://dlibra.umcs.lublin.pl/Content/24167/czas4051_62_2 007_22.pdf
  • Quy D.V., Hieu N.M., Tra P.T., et al. Synthesis of silicacoated magnetic nanoparticles and application in the detection of pathogenic viruses // J. Nanomaterials. 2013. Vol. 2013. 603940. (6 p.) DOI: 10.1155/2013/603940
  • Liu Q., Li J., Liu H., et al. Rapid, cost-effective DNA quantification via a visually-detectable aggregation of superparamagnetic silica-magnetite nanoparticles // Nano Research. 2014. Vol. 7, no. 5. P. 755–784. DOI: 10.1007/s12274-014-0436-9
  • Oberacker P., Stepper P., Bond D.M., et al. Bio-onmagnetic-beads (BOMB): Open platform for highthroughput nucleic acid extraction and manipulation // PLoS Biol. 2019. Vol. 17, no. 1. e3000107. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000107
  • Sur K., McFall S.M., Yeh E.T., al. Immiscible phase nucleic acid purification eliminates PCR inhibitors with a single pass of paramagnetic particles through a hydrophobic liquid // J. Mol. Diagnostics. 2010. Vol. 12, no. 5. P. 620–628. DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090190
  • Berry S.M., Alarid E.T., Beebe D.J. One-step purification of nucleic acid for gene expression analysis via immiscible filtration assisted by surface tension (IFAST) // Lab. Chip. 2011. Vol. 11, no. 10. P. 1747–1753. DOI: 10.1039/c1lc00004g
  • Bordelon H., Russ P.K., Wright D.W., Haselton F.R. A magnetic bead-based method for concentrating DNA from human urine for downstream detection // PLOS ONE. 2013. Vol. 8, no. 7. e68369. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068369
  • Scherr T.F., Ryskoski H.B., Doyle A.B., Haselton F.R. A two-magnet strategy for improved mixing and capture from biofluids // Biomicrofluidics. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 024118-1–024118-15. DOI: 10.1063/1.4946014
  • Dzhenloda R.Kh, Petrov D.G., Shkinev V.M., Spivakov B.Yu. DNA recovery from environmental samples on suspension columns under a combined action of ultrasound and magnetic fields followed by polymerase chain reaction detection // Mendeleev Commun. 2017. Vol. 27, is. 3. P. 302–303. DOI: 10.1016/j.mencom.2017.05.029
  • Кулмамабетова Г. Пробоподготовка. Методы выделения ДНК/РНК. Астана: ЕНУ, 2012. URL: https://studylib.ru/doc/2335021/probopodgotovka.metody-vydeleniya-dnk-rnk.
  • Chircov C., Grumezescu A.M., Holban A.M. Magnetic particles for advanced molecular diagnosis // Materials. 2019. Vol. 12. 2158. 17 p. DOI: 10.3390/ma12132158
  • Walsh P.S., Metzger D.A., Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material // BioTechniques. 1991. Vol. 10, no. 4. P. 506–513.
  • Sepp R., Szabó I., Uda H., Sakamoto H. Rapid techniques for DNA extraction from routinely processed archival tissue for use in PCR // J. Clin. Pathol. 1994. Vol. 47, is. 4. P. 318-323. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.47.4.318
  • Polski J.M., Kimzey S., Percival R.W., Grosso L.E. Rapid and effective processing of blood specimens for diagnostic PCR using filter paper and Chelex-100 // Mol. Pathol. 1998. Vol. 51, is. 4. P. 215–217. DOI: 10.1136/mp.51.4.215
  • Phillips K., McCallum N., Welch L. A comparison of methods for forensic DNA extraction: Chelex® 100 and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit (manual and automated) // Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012. Vol. 6, no 2. P. 282–285. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.018 109. Idris B., Goodwin W. Comparison of Chelex®–100 with two solid phase DNA extraction techniques // Forens. Sci. Int. Gen. Suppl. Ser. 2015. Vol. 5. P. e274–e275. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.109
  • Ip S.C., Lin S.W., Lai K.M. An evaluation of the performance of five extraction methods: Chelex® 100, QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit, QIAamp® DNA Investigator Kit, QIAsymphony® DNA Investigator® Kit and DNA IQ™ // Sci. Justice. 2015. Vol. 55, no. 3. P. 200– 208. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.01.005
  • Aygan A. Nucleic Acid extraction from clinical specimens for PCR applications // Turk. J. Biol. 2006. Vol. 30, is. 2. P. 107–120.
  • Fukui Y., Sawabe T. Rapid detection of Vibrio harveyiin seawater by real-time PCR // Microbes Environ. 2008. Vol. 23, no. 2. P. 172–176. DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.23.173
  • Musapa M., Kumwenda T., Mkulama M., et al. A simple Chelex protocol for DNA extraction from Anopheles spp // J. Vis. Exp. 2013. Vol. 71. e3281. DOI: 10.3791/3281
  • Al-Griw H.H., Zraba Z.A., Al-Muntaser S.K., et al. Effects of storage temperature on the quantity and integrity of genomic DNA extracted from mice tissues: A comparison of recovery methods // Open Veterinary J. 2017. Vol. 7, no. 3. P. 239–243. DOI: 10.4314/ovj.v7i3.7
  • Ruiz- Fuentes J.L., Diaz A., Entenza A.E., et al. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae from Ziehl-Neelsen-stained microscopic slides // Int. J. Mycobacteriology. 2015. Vol. 4, is. 4. P. 284–289. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2015.06.005
  • Kolia-Diafouka P., Godreuil S., Bourdin A., et al. Optimized lysis-extraction method combined with IS6110amplification for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in paucibacillary sputum specimens // Front. Microbiol. 2018. Vol. 9. 2224. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02224
  • Leung E.T., Zheng L., Wong R.Y., et al. Rapid and simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and Beijing/W genotype in sputum by an optimized DNA extraction protocol and a novel multiplex real-time PCR // J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011. Vol. 49, no. 7. P. 2509–2515. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00108-11
  • Reyes-Escogido L., Balam-Chi M., Rodriguez-Buenfil I., et al. Purification of bacterial genomic DNA in less than 20 min using chelex-100 microwave: examples from strains of lactic acid bacteria isolated from soil samples // Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2010. Vol. 98, no. 4. P. 465– 474. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-010-9462-0
  • Martin-Platero A.M., Peralta-Sánchez J.M., Soler J.J., Martinez-Bueno M. Chelex-based DNA isolation procedure for the identification of microbial communities of eggshell surfaces // Anal. Biochem. 2010. Vol. 397, is. 2. P. 253–255. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.10.041
  • Singh U.A., Kumari M., Iyengar S. Method for improving the quality of genomic DNA obtained from minute quantities of tissue and blood samples using Chelex 100 resin // Biological Procedures Online. 2018. Vol. 20. 12. DOI: 10.1186/s12575-018-0077-6
  • Lienhard A., Schäffer S. Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods // Peer J. 2019. Vol. 7. e6753. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6753
  • Kapustin D.V., Prostyakova A.I., Alexeev Ya.I., et al. High-throughput method of one-step DNA isolation for PCR diagnostics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis // Acta Naturae. 2014. Vol. 6, no. 2 (21). P. 48–52. URL: http://actanaturae.ru/catalog/225.aspx
Еще